The Public GalleryToronto

Infrastructure and Environment Committee · 2019-04-25 · 2019.IE4.6

The filed record

Strategy for Future Solid Waste Management Processing Material Recovery Facilities (MRF) Service Contracts

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

The decision

2019-04-25 · Infrastructure and Environment Committee · referred

As filed

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee: 1. Referred the item to the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services with the request to report to the May 23, 2019 Infrastructure and Environment Committee Meeting.

On the agenda

As the city filed it

The waste management landscape in Toronto and across Ontario is imminently set to significantly change. With a desire to move to an Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) model, municipalities will soon no longer be responsible for managing and processing their recyclable material streams, nor responsible for any of the associated costs. This new Provincial framework brings with it a climate of uncertainty, where stability in processing services needs to be taken seriously and is the prudent direction to take.

Show the rest of As the city filed it, 2,294 more characters as filed

Some changes to consider are: 1. Future contracts for processing will be removed from municipal authority and made the responsibility of product producers, or others with a commercial connection as designated by provincial regulation, likely facilitated through engagement with a Producer Responsibility Organization (PRO). 2. Full transition to EPR implementation date target of 2024 (moving away from the current 50/50 cost-sharing system between municipalities and industry). 3. Timeline of EPR transition anticipated to be released within a 6-month period by the Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks - Toronto's current processing contracts are set to expire in 2020 and 2021 respectively (extension options are available). 4. Significant staff changes within the Solid Waste Management Services Division at the City - time is needed to bring staff up to speed in their new roles. 5. The lack of a dedicated EPR Consultation is missing from the City's current Long Term Waste Strategy. 6. Market costs are rising all over North America due to China National Sword and increased contamination, meaning that issuing RFPs and entering into long term contracts now will not provide the desired cost savings to the City but could potentially double rates which has been seen in recent contract awards. This motion seeks to receive enhanced reporting on the upcoming wind-up of the Blue Box Program, schedule dedicated Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) consultations to be added to the City's Long Term Waste Management Strategy and that Infrastructure and Environment Committee consider delaying the issuance of any RFPs that will result in long term contracts to provide staff with sufficient time to conduct a thorough, transparent, equitable and inclusive consultation on EPR while providing stability and continuity of processing services without a cost increase and provide security for the 400 local residents currently employed at the MRF during the EPR transformation period. The issuance of a Request for Proposal (RFP) prior to the new Provincial regulations, that will not result in cost savings for the City as the current market continues to dictate rising costs. Status quo with a strong partner is often preferable when the regulatory landscape is about to evolve.

Staff recommended

Councillor James Pasternak requests that: 1. The Infrastructure and Environment Committee direct the General Manager of Solid Waste Management Services to keep Members updated on transition to EPR timelines and overall future contracting processes regarding the wind-up of the Blue Box programming through regular reports to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee. 2. The Infrastructure and Environment Committee direct the General Manager of Solid Waste Management Services to schedule dedicated Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) consultations with relevant and directly impacted stakeholders and to submit a report back to Members of the Infrastructure and Environment Committee in Q2 2020, as an addendum/supplement to the City's Long Term Waste Management Strategy.

Show the rest of Staff recommended, 571 more characters as filed

3. The Infrastructure and Environment Committee direct the General Manager of Solid Waste Management Services to delay the issuance of any Requests for Proposals that entail long term contracts regarding Single Stream Recyclable Materials (Blue Bin Recyclables) Processing Services until the EPR consultation report is brought back to Committee in Q2 2020 and the Provincial EPR timelines are clarified. This will maintain stability of current costs for the City of Toronto, processing services and secure local employment while the EPR transition landscape is finalized.

    On the record

    The item as the City filed it

    More from this meeting