The Public GalleryToronto

Toronto City Council · 2019-05-14 · 2019.MM7.21

The filed record

393 Harbord Street - Representation at a Toronto Local Appeal Body Hearing - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

The decision

2019-05-14 · Toronto City Council · adopted

As filed

City Council on May 14 and 15, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor, and any other appropriate City staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing for 393 Harbord Street to request a condition be imposed with respect to the building depth of the third storey as shown in Application B0090/18TEY, A0962/18TEY, A0963/18TEY. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.

Show the rest of As filed, 291 more characters as filed

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeal and, if a resolution is reached, to settle the appeal at the City Solicitor's discretion, and in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

The vote

Adopt Item · Carried, 25-1

For (25)Ana Bailão, Anthony Perruzza, Brad Bradford, Cynthia Lai, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Frances Nunziata, Gary Crawford, Gord Perks, James Pasternak, Jaye Robinson, Jennifer McKelvie, Jim Karygiannis, Joe Cressy, John Filion, John Tory, Josh Matlow, Kristyn Wong-Tam, Michael Ford, Michael Thompson, Mike Colle, Mike Layton, Paul Ainslie, Paula Fletcher, Shelley Carroll, Stephen Holyday
Against (1)Mark Grimes
The whole record, all 26 members

Every name opens that member’s record.

On the agenda

As the city filed it

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment (Application B0090/18TEY, A0962/18TEY, A0963/18TEY) (the "Application") to sever the lot into two residential lots and to create a mutually accessible right-of-way, with associated variances. The application proposes a new four-storey semi-detached dwelling with a rear integral garage, rear second and third storey decks, and a front fourth storey balcony on each of the severed lots.

Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,179 more characters as filed

The requested variances are with respect to floor space index, soft landscaping, driveway width, building type, setback from a lane, lot frontage, building height, first storey height, rear setback, penetration into the angular plane, and front setback. City Planning staff expressed concern with respect to the depth of the third storey in a report (February 25, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District (attached). At its hearing on March 6, 2019, the Committee of Adjustment refused the Application (the "Decision"), which is attached to this Motion. The applicant has appealed the Decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body. This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor, and appropriate City Staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in order to request the Toronto Local Appeal Body limit the building depth of the third storey. This Motion will give the City Solicitor authority to negotiate a settlement of the appeal and retain outside consultants, as necessary. This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the Decision has been appealed and the City Solicitor requires instructions to attend the hearing in support of its position.

Staff recommended

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor, and any other appropriate City staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing for 393 Harbord Street to request a condition be imposed with respect to the building depth of the third storey as shown in Application B0090/18TEY, A0962/18TEY, A0963/18TEY. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.

Show the rest of Staff recommended, 291 more characters as filed

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeal and, if a resolution is reached, to settle the appeal at the City Solicitor's discretion, and in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

    On the record

    The item as the City filed it

    More from this meeting

    The whole meeting