The filed record
Selection of Candidates for the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2019-03-18 · Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal · amended
As filed
The Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal: 1. Selected the following thirteen candidates for interview for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal: Candidate #DDR1-11 Candidate #DDR1-18 Candidate #DDR1-19 Candidate #DDR1-27 Candidate #DDR1-29 Candidate #DDR1-30 Candidate #DDR1-36 Candidate #DDR1-49 Candidate #DDR1-56 Candidate #DDR1-58 Candidate #DDR1-60 Candidate #DDR1-64 Candidate #DDR1-73 2. Direct
Show the rest of As filed, 252 more characters as filed
that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 7, 2019) from the City Clerk remain confidential in its entirety as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
The Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal will conduct interviews and recommend five candidates, including a Chair, to City Council for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal.
Staff recommended
The City Clerk recommends that: 1. The Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal select 10 candidates listed in Confidential Attachment 1 for interview at its next meeting for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal. 2. The Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential in its entirety as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal.