The filed record
Selection of Candidates for the Administrative Penalty Tribunal
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2019-05-16 · Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal · amended
As filed
The Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal: 1. Selected the following candidates for interview for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal: Candidate #APT1-523 Candidate #APT2-11 Candidate #APT2-38 Candidate #APT2-52 Candidate #APT2-57 Candidate #APT2-62 Candidate #APT2-66 Candidate #APT2-67 Candidate #APT2-72 Candidate #APT2-73 Candidate #APT2-85 Candidate #APT2-86 Candidate #APT2-88 Candidate #APT2-96 Candidate #APT2-98 Candidate #APT2-101 2.
Show the rest of As filed, 271 more characters as filed
Directed that Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (May 9, 2019) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
The Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal will conduct interviews and recommend six candidates to City Council for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal.
Staff recommended
The City Clerk recommends that: 1. The Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal select fifteen candidates listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to interview at its next meeting for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal. 2. The Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachments 1 - 2 remain confidential in its entirety as
Show the rest of Staff recommended, 134 more characters as filed
it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal.