The filed record
Request for Directions - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - 5294-5304 and 5306 Yonge Street
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2019-07-16 · Toronto City Council · amended
As filed
City Council on July 16, 17 and 18, 2019 adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with appropriate staff, to continue to oppose the application, as amended, at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal hearing. 2. Should the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal approve the Official Plan and/or Zoning By-law Amendment applications, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to withhold its Order(s) approving the application until such time as: a.
Show the rest of As filed, 3,525 more characters as filed
the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments are in a form satisfactory to the City; b. the City Solicitor confirms the satisfactory execution and registration of a Section 37 Agreement satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to secure the Section 37 matters; c. the City Solicitor confirms that the owner has provided a Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report and a Geohydrology Report, acceptable to the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; d. the City Solicitor confirms that the owner has designed and provided financial securities for any upgrades or required improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, and Geohydrology Report to support the development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements or upgrades are required to support the development, according to the Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, and Geohydrology Report, accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and e. the City Solicitor confirms that the implementation of the Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report and Geohydrology Report accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services either does not require changes to the proposed amending By-laws or any such required changes have been made to the proposed amending By-laws to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the City Solicitor and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services. 3. Should the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal approve the application, City Council direct the City Solicitor to advise the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal that the Zoning By-laws should not be approved without the provision of such services, facilities or matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, as may be considered appropriate by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the applicant and the Ward Councillor. 4. Should the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal approve the application, City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time. 5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue discussions with the applicant, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to address the issues outlined in the report (June 24, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District and to report back to City Council on the outcome, including proposed Section 37 contributions relating to any revised proposal, as appropriate.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and zoning by-law to permit a thirty-three storey residential building with retail on the ground floor at 5294-5304 and 5306 Yonge Street. The applicant has appealed the application to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT") due to Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the time prescribed by the Planning Act and a hearing has been scheduled to commence on October 28, 2019.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,222 more characters as filed
On May 31, 2019, the applicant submitted a revised proposal in the form of a "With Prejudice", or public, settlement offer which is the subject of this report. The revised thirty-three storey proposal would have a height of 101.26 metres (excluding the mechanical penthouse) and a gross floor area of 22,188 square metres. The gross floor area would result in a Floor Space Index (a "FSI") of 8.75 times the area of the lot. A total of 109 vehicular parking spaces are proposed underground. An on-site parkland dedication is now proposed in this revised proposal. The changes made by the applicant are discussed in this report, however, despite the modifications, the proposal is still not supportable for the reasons outlined in this report. This report recommends that the City Solicitor, together with City Planning and other appropriate staff, attend the LPAT hearing in opposition to the amended Official Plan and zoning by-law amendment applications. In the opinion of Planning staff, the proposal does not conform with the Growth Plan, is not consistent with the PPS, does not conform to the Official Plan or the North York Centre Secondary Plan, does not constitute good planning and is not in the public interest.
Staff recommended
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with appropriate staff, to continue to oppose the application, as amended, at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal hearing. 2. Should the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal approve the Official Plan and/or zoning by-law amendment applications, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal withhold its Order(s) approving the application until such time as: a.
Show the rest of Staff recommended, 3,440 more characters as filed
the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments are in a form satisfactory to the City; b. the City Solicitor confirms the satisfactory execution and registration of a Section 37 Agreement satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to secure the Section 37 matters; c. the City Solicitor confirms that the owner has provided a Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report and a Geohydrology Report, acceptable to the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; d. the City Solicitor confirms that the owner has designed and provided financial securities for any upgrades or required improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, and Geohydrology Report to support the development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements or upgrades are required to support the development, according to the Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, and Geohydrology Report, accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and e. the City Solicitor confirms that the implementation of the Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report and Geohydrology Report accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services either does not require changes to the proposed amending by-laws or any such required changes have been made to the proposed amending by-laws to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the City Solicitor and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services. 3. Should the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal approve the application, City Council direct the City Solicitor to advise the Tribunal that the Zoning By-laws should not be approved without the provision of such services, facilities or matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, as may be considered appropriate by the Chief Planner in consultation with the applicant and the Ward Councillor. 4. Should the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal approve the application, Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry & Recreation (PF&R). The development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, PF&R, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time. 5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue discussions with the applicant, in consultation with the Local Councillor, to address the issues outlined in the report (June 24, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and to report back to City Council on the outcome, including proposed Section 37 contributions relating to any revised proposal, as appropriate.
Considered
2019-06-25 · North York Community Council · forwarded without recommendation
Decision as filed
North York Community Council submits this item to City Council without recommendation.
2019-07-16 · Toronto City Council · amended
On the record
More from this meeting
- Final Report - Zoning Amendment Application - 665, 667, 669 and 671 Sheppard Avenue WestFiled record
- Final Report - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - 160 Sheppard Avenue WestFiled record
- Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 11-19, 25 and 29 Industrial StreetFiled record
- Final Report - Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium and Part Lot Control Exemption Applications - 2962A, 2962B, 2962C, 2966A, and 2966B Bayview AvenueFiled record
- Final Report - Rental Housing Demolition Application - 2779-2781 Yonge Street and 15-17 and 19-21 Strathgowan AvenueFiled record
- Request for Direction Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 368-386 Eglinton Avenue EastFiled record