The Public GalleryToronto

←Toronto City Council · 2020-01-29 · 2020.CC14.10

The filed record

Section 37 and Section 45 Funds Not Received in 2008-2017 Approvals - Update on Additional Outstanding Funds Received

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

The decision

2020-01-29 · Toronto City Council · adopted

As filed

City Council on January 29, 2020, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (January 23, 2020) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor. 2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (January 23, 2020) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor remain confidential in its entirety as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Show the rest of As filed, 316 more characters as filed

Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (January 23, 2020) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor remains confidential in its entirety in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

The vote

Adopt Item · Carried, 24-0

For (24)Ana Bailão, Brad Bradford, Cynthia Lai, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Frances Nunziata, Gary Crawford, Gord Perks, James Pasternak, Jennifer McKelvie, Jim Karygiannis, Joe Cressy, John Filion, John Tory, Josh Matlow, Kristyn Wong-Tam, Mark Grimes, Michael Ford, Michael Thompson, Mike Colle, Mike Layton, Paul Ainslie, Paula Fletcher, Shelley Carroll, Stephen Holyday
Absent (2)Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson
The whole record, all 26 members

Every name opens that member’s record.

On the agenda

As the city filed it

The report from the Chief Planner dated August 12, 2019 (Item PH8.8) identified five developments where Section 37 cash payments to the City totalling $701,387 were due, and no records of receipt had been found. Staff have continued to seek outstanding payments from responsive developers. Discussions have resulted in the payment of an additional outstanding $3,387.44 by one developer and an offer to make a payment of $100,000 on behalf of a developer whose company has been dissolved.

Show the rest of As the city filed it, 298 more characters as filed

The purpose of this report is twofold. This report responds to the request to report to City Council with respect to any additional outstanding funds received. It also seeks City Council's instructions respecting the proposed $100,000 payment noted above and discussed in Confidential Attachment 1.

Staff recommended

The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor recommend that: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 from the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning remain confidential in its entirety as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

    On the record

    The item as the City filed it

    More from this meeting

    The whole meeting