The filed record
64 Prince Arthur Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2020-05-28 · Toronto City Council · adopted
As filed
City Council on May 28, 2020, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 20, 2020) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 20, 2020) from the City Solicitor at the discretion of the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 20, 2020) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice and information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Show the rest of As filed, 3,144 more characters as filed
Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 20, 2020) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice and information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 20, 2020) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor. June 10, 2020 The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 20, 2020) from the City Solicitor, as adopted by City Council, are now public, as follows: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with the appropriate staff, to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to oppose the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 64 Prince Arthur Avenue for the reasons set out in Public Attachment 1 to the report (May 20, 2020) from the City Solicitor. 2. In the event that the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal allows the appeal, in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to withhold the issuance of any order until such time as the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that: a. the final form of the Zoning By-law Amendment is satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, including the provision of seven visitor parking spaces on parking level P1; b. the owner has submitted a revised Functional Servicing Report, including confirmation of water and fire flow, sanitary and storm water capacity, Storm Water Management Report and Hydro-geological Report (the "Engineering Reports") that are satisfactory to the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, in consultation with the General Manager, Toronto Water; c. the final Engineering Reports accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services do not require changes to the Zoning By-law Amendment or any required changes have been made to the Zoning By-law Amendment to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the City Solicitor and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; d. should it be determined that any improvements, upgrades, or new municipal infrastructure are necessary to support the development in the accepted Engineering Reports, the design and the provision of financial securities for those improvements, upgrades or new infrastructure have been secured to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and e. appropriate Section 37 benefits that may be required to support the development have been secured in a Section 37 agreement to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and such agreement has been executed and registered on title to the lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
The purpose of this report is to request further instructions for the potential Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT") hearing that is currently scheduled to commence on July 6, 2020 for three weeks. The applicant has appealed the proposed rezoning of 64 Prince Arthur Avenue to the LPAT due to Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time prescribed by the Planning Act (the "Appeal"). The appealed application was revised and it proposes to amend the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 and City-wide Zoning by-law 569-2013 to permit a 19-storey (66.7 metres plus a 7-metre mechanical penthouse) residential building with 178 dwelling units and 25 parking spaces in a 3-level below ground garage at 64 Prince Arthur Avenue.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 338 more characters as filed
The original proposal was for a 29-storey (120 metres plus a 10-metre mechanical penthouse) residential building with 60 dwelling units and 73 parking spaces with a 2-level below grade garage. On July 23, 2018, City Council directed the City Solicitor, along with appropriate staff, to oppose the 29 storey proposal and oppose the Appeal.
Staff recommended
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the Report (May 20, 2020) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Report (May 20, 2020) from the City Solicitor at the discretion of the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council. 3. City Council
Show the rest of Staff recommended, 279 more characters as filed
direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Report (May 20, 2020) from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice and information, which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming BillsFiled record
- City of Toronto Service Restart and Recovery UpdateFiled record
- Call to OrderFiled record
- Property Tax Payment Deferral Program due to COVID-19 ImpactsFiled record
- Introduction of Committee Reports and New Business from City OfficialsFiled record
- Creating New Affordable Housing Opportunities through Phase Two of the Housing Now InitiativeFiled record