The Public GalleryToronto

Toronto City Council · 2020-09-30 · 2020.CC24.8

The filed record

2901 Bayview Avenue and 630 Sheppard Avenue East - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment - Request for Directions

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

The decision

2020-09-30 · Toronto City Council · adopted

As filed

City Council on September 30, October 1 and 2, 2020, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (September 21, 2020) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (September 21, 2020) from the City Solicitor at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

Show the rest of As filed, 4,179 more characters as filed

3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (September 21, 2020) from the City Solicitor remain confidential as they contain advice and information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (September 21, 2020) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contain advice and information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (September 21, 2020) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor. Confidential Appendix A to the report (September 21, 2020) from the City Solicitor remain confidential it its entirety in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice and information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. November 12, 2020 The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (September 21, 2020) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public as follows, the City Solicitor having exercised the City Solicitor's discretion to make them public: 1. City Council accept the Owner's offer to settle the subject appeal on the terms described in Public Attachment 1 and Public Attachment 2 (collectively, the "Settlement Offer") to the report (September 21, 2020) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal in support of the development proposal as described in the Settlement Offer and request that the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal make the site subject to Holding (H) Symbols in accordance with the terms described in the Settlement Offer. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to take all steps necessary to implement the terms of the Settlement Offer, at no cost to the City for any and all works that may be required to effect the development either on-site or on the City's property, subject to the terms of the Settlement Offer, including the review, approval and preparation of all matters described in Part 4 below, and entering into and registering against title to the subject lands an agreement with the Owner pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act in accordance with the terms described in the Settlement Offer. 4. In the event that the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal allows the appeal in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to withhold the issuance of its Order(s) until such time as the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal has been advised in writing by the City Solicitor that: a. the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendments are in a form satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, and that they, amongst other matters, provide for the securing community benefits pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act and any other necessary matters; b. the Owner has executed an agreement with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to secure community benefits and all other matters of legal convenience as determined necessary by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and the City Solicitor and the Owner has registered the executed Section 37 Agreement against title to the site, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor; and c. the Owner has completed the site servicing review for the applications (comprised of Functional Servicing Report, Stormwater Management Report, and Hydrogeological Report) to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services. 5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to take such necessary steps, as required, to implement City Council's decision.

The vote

Adopt Item · Carried, 23-0

For (23)Ana Bailão, Anthony Perruzza, Brad Bradford, Cynthia Lai, Frances Nunziata, Gary Crawford, Gord Perks, James Pasternak, Jennifer McKelvie, Joe Cressy, John Filion, John Tory, Josh Matlow, Kristyn Wong-Tam, Mark Grimes, Michael Ford, Michael Thompson, Mike Colle, Mike Layton, Paul Ainslie, Paula Fletcher, Shelley Carroll, Stephen Holyday
Absent (2)Denzil Minnan-Wong, Jaye Robinson
The whole record, all 25 members

Every name opens that member’s record.

On the agenda

As the city filed it

The Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications for the subject site have been appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) on the basis that the City failed to make a decision within the prescribed time period set out in the Planning Act. On November 16, 2018, the applicant submitted a revised proposal. A Request for Directions report dated May 13, 2019 was adopted by North York Community Council and City Council on June 18, 2019 which directed the City Solicitor and staff to continue to oppose the applications at the LPAT.

Show the rest of As the city filed it, 139 more characters as filed

The purpose of this report is to request further instructions for the 15-day LPAT hearing that is scheduled to commence September 21, 2020.

Staff recommended

The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 from the City Solicitor at the discretion of the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential

Show the rest of Staff recommended, 232 more characters as filed

Attachment 1 and all the information in Confidential Appendix "A" to Confidential Attachment 1 from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential, as it contains advice and information, which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

    On the record

    The item as the City filed it

    More from this meeting

    The whole meeting