The filed record
3655 Kingston Road - Request for Representation at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2020-10-27 · Toronto City Council · adopted
As filed
City Council on October 27, 28 and 30, 2020, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and any other appropriate City staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing in respect of 3655 Kingston Road (File 20 205956 S45 24 TLAB) to support the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the applicant's proposed development (Application A0189/20SC) and oppose the appeal. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.
Show the rest of As filed, 294 more characters as filed
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate, if necessary, a resolution of the appeal and, if a resolution is reached to settle the appeal at the City Solicitor's discretion, and in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
On September 23, 2020, the Scarborough District Panel of the Committee of Adjustment refused an Application related to the property municipally known as 3655 Kingston Road (the "Subject Property") for minor variances to permit additional variances for the 9 storey apartment building. The Application was filed as Application A0189/20SC. The Applicant has appealed the refusal decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body (20 205956 S45 24 TLAB).
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,212 more characters as filed
Minor variances were refused to allow the proposed number of dwelling units of 106, whereas the maximum permitted number of dwelling units is 99 and the proposed vertical clearance of 1.98 metres for parking spaces T78 and T79, whereas parking spaces must have minimum vertical clearance of 2 metres. A previous Committee of Adjustment application (A0035/19SC) permitted variances for lot coverage and floor area. The development was the subject of a combined Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application (File 15 245019 ESC 36 OZ). On October 4, 2017, City Council approved the application and adopted amendments to the Scarborough Village Community Zoning By-law 10010 and the Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 to permit the development. The proposed building setbacks, height and the entire building envelope have not changed since City Council passed the Zoning By-law amendments. The decision of the Committee of Adjustment, Scarborough District recommended refusal of the application as the applications did not maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan or Zoning By-law and the requested variance was not minor nor considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land.
Staff recommended
Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and any other appropriate City staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing in respect of 3655 Kingston Road (File 20 205956 S45 24 TLAB) to support the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the applicant's proposed development (Application A0189/20SC) and oppose the appeal. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.
Show the rest of Staff recommended, 294 more characters as filed
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate, if necessary, a resolution of the appeal and, if a resolution is reached to settle the appeal at the City Solicitor's discretion, and in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming BillsFiled record
- Deciding the Method to Fill the Vacancy in Office of Councillor, Ward 22 - Scarborough AgincourtFiled record
- Supporting Taxi Operators from COVID-related Financial Hardship - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Paul AinslieFiled record
- Call to OrderFiled record
- Update on Clarification of Councillor Notification during the Acquisition and Lease Process in Real Estate Transactions for Use as Shelter SitesFiled record
- Reopening Council Decision on Item 2020.EY16.12 in order to permit a further time-extension of Temporary Traffic Regulation, Finch Avenue West at Elana Drive - by Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Councillor James PasternakFiled record