Request for Direction Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 16 Kirtling Place

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

The decision

2020-12-16 · Toronto City Council · adopted

As filed

City Council on December 16, 17 and 18, 2020, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to oppose the Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 16 Kirtling Place in its current form. 2. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve issues outlined in the report (November 16, 2020) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District.

Show the rest of As filed, 837 more characters as filed

3. In the event that the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to withhold its Order until such time as the Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that: a. the final form and content of the draft Zoning By-law Amendments are satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and b. the owner has addressed the comments in the Engineering and Construction Services memo dated December 24, 2019, as applicable, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to take such necessary steps, as required, to implement City Council's decision.

On the agenda

As the city filed it

On November 1, 2019, an application to amend the Zoning By-law was submitted to the City of Toronto for 16 Kirtling Place (the "Site"), which proposes to amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 and North York Zoning By-law 7625 to permit one block of townhouses having seven units, fronting York Mills Road (the "Zoning By-law Amendment Application"). On March 3, 2020, the applicant appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment Application to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT").

Show the rest of As the city filed it, 645 more characters as filed

The appeal was made without revisions to the original proposal and citing City Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the timeframe prescribed by the Planning Act. A pre-hearing conference has not yet been scheduled. This report recommends that the City Solicitor together with City Planning staff and other appropriate staff be directed to oppose the application, in its current form, at the LPAT. This report also recommends that despite the applicant's appeal of the Zoning By-law Amendment Application to the LPAT, City Planning staff continue to work with the applicant to resolve the issues detailed in this report.

Staff recommended

The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to oppose the Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 16 Kirtling Place in its current form. 2. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve issues outlined in this report. 3. In the event that the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal withhold its Order until such time as the Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that: a.

Show the rest of Staff recommended, 540 more characters as filed

The final form and content of the draft zoning by-law amendments are satisfactory to the City Solicitor and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and b. The owner has addressed the comments in the Engineering and Construction Services memo dated December 24, 2019, as applicable, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to take such necessary steps, as required, to implement the foregoing.

Considered

2020-12-03 · North York Community Council · adopted
Decision as filed
North York Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to oppose the Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 16 Kirtling Place in its current form. 2. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve issues outlined in this report (November 16, 2020) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District.
Show the rest of Decision as filed, 825 more characters as filed
3. In the event that the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal withhold its Order until such time as the Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that: a. The final form and content of the draft zoning by-law amendments are satisfactory to the City Solicitor and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and b. The owner has addressed the comments in the Engineering and Construction Services memo dated December 24, 2019, as applicable, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to take such necessary steps, as required, to implement the foregoing.
2020-12-16 · Toronto City Council · adopted

On the record

The item as the City filed it

More from this meeting

The whole meeting