The filed record
Investigation into Allegations of Reprisal: Insufficient Evidence to Support Reprisal
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2021-07-14 · Toronto City Council · adopted
As filed
City Council on July 14, 15 and 16, 2021, adopted the following: 1. City Council receive the report (June 30, 2021) from the Auditor General for information.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
This report provides the results of an investigation into an allegation of reprisal from a former City of Toronto employee whose position was terminated. The former employee claimed the termination of their employment was reprisal by management for disclosing billing concerns and potential conflicts of interest between a Director and vendors. In accordance with the Toronto Public Service Bylaw, Chapter 192, the Auditor General's Office (AGO) has the responsibility to investigate reprisal, in consultation with the City Manager or designate.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 995 more characters as filed
Reprisal investigations are complex. Termination is one of the most severe types of reprisal, and therefore the Auditor General initiated an investigation into the allegations. Under the City of Toronto Act, the Auditor General is also responsible for assisting city council in holding itself and city administrators accountable for the quality of stewardship over public funds and for achievement of value for money in city operations. Ensuring that employees can come forward in a safe environment to report potential wrongdoing is a key internal control that helps to safeguard City assets and ensure value for money. The Auditor General has concluded that there is insufficient evidence found to substantiate that the former employee was the subject of reprisal for reporting concerns of potential wrongdoing during the course of their employment or for raising questions about potential conflicts of interest. Therefore no further action is recommended with respect to the alleged reprisal.
Staff recommended
The Auditor General recommends that: 1. City Council receive this report for information.
Considered
2021-07-07 · Audit Committee · adopted
Decision as filed
The Audit Committee recommends that: 1. City Council receive the report (June 30, 2021) from the Auditor General for information.
2021-07-14 · Toronto City Council · adopted
On the record
More from this meeting
- 2020 Audited Financial Statements - Consolidated City, Sinking Funds, and Consolidated Trust FundsFiled record
- The City of Toronto Audit Findings Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2020Filed record
- Obligatory Reserve Funds (Deferred Revenues) and Reserves and Council-Directed Reserve Funds (Accumulated Surplus) as at December 31, 2020Filed record
- Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2020 - AgenciesFiled record
- Status of the Financial Statement Audits of the City's Agencies and Corporations for the Year Ended December 31, 2020Filed record
- Auditor General's Status Report on Outstanding RecommendationsFiled record