The filed record
35-39 Holmes Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Further Direction Regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Hearing
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2021-03-10 · Toronto City Council · adopted
As filed
City Council on March 10, 2021, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 1, 2021) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 1, 2021) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 1, 2021) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Show the rest of As filed, 3,903 more characters as filed
The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 1, 2021) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public, as follows: 1. City Council refuse the with prejudice Settlement Offer dated February 8, 2021. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other appropriate staff, to continue to oppose the Applicant's appeal respecting the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications for 35-39 Holmes Avenue, and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal hearing in opposition to the Revised Plans, and retain such experts as may be required. 3. In the event that the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal allows the appeal, in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to withhold its final Order on the Zoning By-law Amendment until: a. the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendments are in a form satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; b. the City Solicitor confirms that the owner has satisfied all outstanding engineering matters, including providing a Functional Servicing Report, Stormwater Management Report, a Site Servicing Plan and a Hydrogeological Report, acceptable to the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; c. the City Solicitor confirms that the owner has designed and provided financial securities for any upgrades or required improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Functional Servicing Report, Stormwater Management Report, Site Servicing Plan and Hydrogeological Report to support the development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements or upgrades are required; d. the City Solicitor confirms that the implementation of the Functional Servicing Report, Stormwater Management Report, Site Servicing Plan and Hydrogeological Report accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services either does not require changes to the proposed amending by-laws or any such required changes have been made to the proposed amending by-laws to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the City Solicitor and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and e. the City Solicitor confirms that the Applicant and the City have agreed to an appropriate Section 37 contribution satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, and that such contribution has been secured through the execution and registration of a Section 37 Agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue to engage in discussions with the Applicant to explore further revisions to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications in order to resolve City Planning staff's outstanding concerns with the proposal and achieve greater conformity with the policies of the North York Centre Secondary Plan, including the relevant density policies of that plan. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 1, 2021) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 1, 2021) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
Holmes Avenue Ltd. (the "Applicant") is the owner of the property municipally known as 35-39 Holmes Avenue (the "Subject Property"). The Applicant applied for an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment in order to facilitate a proposed residential redevelopment of the Subject Property (the "Original Application"). The Original Application proposed an 18-storey residential building. On June 26, 2018, City Council considered Item NY31.5 and refused the Original Application.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,519 more characters as filed
City Council also authorized the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT") to oppose the Original Application in the event the Council's decision to refuse the proposal was appealed. On July 26, 2018, the Applicant filed appeals against City Council's decision to refuse the Original Application. The first Prehearing Conference for this matter was held on November 5, 2020. A ten day hearing before the LPAT is schedule to commence on July 5, 2021. On February 8, 2021, the Applicant, through their legal counsel Overland LLP, provided a with prejudice settlement offer regarding the LPAT appeal (the "Settlement Offer"). The Settlement Offer proposes a 17-storey residential building, incorporating changes to the design of the development, as shown on the revised architectural plans dated November 20, 2020 (the "Revised Plans"). The Settlement Offer is included as Public Attachment 1 to this report. The Revised Plans, which include a statistics sheet, are included as Public Attachment 2 to this report. The Settlement Offer also includes a Draft Official Plan Amendment and Draft Zoning By-law Amendment which are included as Public Attachment 3 and 4 to this report respectively. Further details regarding the Settlement Offer and the Revised Plans are provided in the "Comments" section below. The purpose of this report is to request instructions for the upcoming LPAT Prehearing Hearing. City Planning has been involved in the preparation of this report.
Staff recommended
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report, if adopted by City Council. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice subject to solicitor-client privilege.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming BillsFiled record
- External Compliance Audit Reports for the Integrity Commissioner, Lobbyist Registrar and Ombudsman Offices for the Year Ended December 31, 2019Filed record
- Swiss Challenge Negotiated Request for Proposals for a Digital Government PlatformFiled record
- 1390 Weston Road - Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Liquor Licence Application - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Ana BailãoFiled record
- Call to OrderFiled record
- Reviewing City of Toronto Policies Governing the Use of Libraries and City Facilities by Individuals and Groups Promoting Intolerance or DiscriminationFiled record