The Public GalleryToronto

Toronto City Council · 2021-11-09 · 2021.CC37.3

The filed record

717-733 Mount Pleasant Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Further Directions

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

The decision

2021-11-09 · Toronto City Council · adopted

As filed

City Council on November 9, 10 and 12, 2021, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 2, 2021) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 2, 2021) from the City Solicitor and City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 2, 2021) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Show the rest of As filed, 5,992 more characters as filed

The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 2, 2021) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public as follows: 1. City Council accept the With Prejudice Settlement Offer dated October 28, 2021 for the lands municipally known as 717-733 Mount Pleasant Road in Public Attachment 1 to the report (November 2, 2021) from the City Solicitor and as generally shown on the Revised Plans dated June 8, 2021 inclusive in Public Attachment 2 to the report (November 2, 2021) from the City Solicitor, subject to the Parts below. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing on this matter in support of the With Prejudice Settlement Offer dated October 28, 2021 for the lands municipally known as 717-733 Mount Pleasant Road in Public Attachment 1 to the report (November 2, 2021) from the City Solicitor and as generally shown on the Revised Plans dated June 8, 2021 inclusive in Public Attachment 2 to the report (November 2, 2021) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to enter into an agreement, pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, in order to secure the following, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor: a. the community benefits to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows: i. an indexed cash contribution in the amount of one-million and six-hundred thousand dollars ($1,600,000.00), to be paid by the Applicant to the City prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for the Site, and to be allocated for community improvements in the vicinity of the Site in Ward 15, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor; ii. the amount of the cash contribution referred to in Part 3 a.i. above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment of the funds by the Applicant to the City; and iii. in the event that the cash contribution in Part 3 a.i. above has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of the Zoning By-law Amendment coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the Site; and b. the matters to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as legal conveniences in support of the development are as follows: i. the design, construction, conveyance, and maintenance of lands by the Applicant to the City of Toronto, being 7.5 metres in width, at the rear of the Subject Site, as shown on the Revised Plans dated June 8, 2021 inclusive in Public Attachment 2 to the report (November 2, 2021) from the City Solicitor, for the purpose of a future north-south public laneway, free and clear of all encumbrances, as required by the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan. Details of the design of the lane shall be secured through the site plan process, in accordance with the applicable City standards, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and ii. the design, construction, installation, and ongoing maintenance by the Owner of the 1.5 metre wide landscaped buffer along the east lot line, located within the lands to be conveyed by the Applicant to the City for the new north-south public laneway referred to in Part 4.b.ii and as shown on the Revised Plans dated June 8, 2021 inclusive in Public Attachment 2 to the report (November 2, 2021) from the City Solicitor, the design of which shall be secured through the site plan process, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 4. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Final Order on the Zoning By-law Amendment Application until such time as the Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that: a. the final form and content of the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments are satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; b. the City has received an executed Section 37 Agreement securing the benefits outlined in Part 3 above and the Section 37 Agreement has been registered on title to the Subject Site; c. the Applicant has submitted a revised Functional Servicing Report and Stormwater Management Report and Hydrogeological Report which address the items contained in the January 4, 2021 Memorandum from Engineering and Construction Services, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; d. the Applicant has submitted a revised Traffic Impact Study, Parking and Loading Study, and Waste Management Study, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and e. the Applicant has submitted a full set of architectural plans, reflecting the settlement offer, for the Subject Site, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to implement City Council's decision. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 2, 2021) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 2, 2021) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

The vote

Adopt Item · Carried, 25-0

For (25)Ana Bailão, Anthony Perruzza, Cynthia Lai, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Frances Nunziata, Gary Crawford, Gord Perks, James Pasternak, Jaye Robinson, Jennifer McKelvie, Joe Cressy, John Filion, John Tory, Josh Matlow, Kristyn Wong-Tam, Mark Grimes, Michael Ford, Michael Thompson, Mike Colle, Mike Layton, Nick Mantas, Paul Ainslie, Paula Fletcher, Shelley Carroll, Stephen Holyday
Absent (1)Brad Bradford
The whole record, all 26 members

Every name opens that member’s record.

On the agenda

As the city filed it

Rockport (MPE) Inc. (the "Applicant") has applied for a Zoning By-law Amendment (the "Application") for the property municipally known as 717-733 Mount Pleasant Road (the "Site" or "Subject Site"). On December 20, 2019, the Applicant initially submitted its Application to amend Zoning By-law Nos. 438-86 and 569-2013 for the Site in order to permit a 27-storey (92 metres including mechanical penthouse) residential building with retail at grade, including a 5-storey base building measuring 18 metres in height, and a proposed density (floor space index) of 6.68 times the area of the lot (the "Original Proposal").

Show the rest of As the city filed it, 3,600 more characters as filed

On July 30, 2020, the Applicant appealed the Application to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT"), now known as the OLT, for non-decision by City Council (the "Appeal"). An OLT hearing for this matter is scheduled for twelve days commending on January 31, 2022. In addition to the City and the Applicant, the South Eglinton Ratepayers' and Residents' Association ("SERRA"), the Toronto District School Board (the "TDSB"), and the Taunton Residents Association (Toronto) Inc. ("TRA") are parties to the Appeal. City Council instructed the City Solicitor in its decision on Item NY21.3 to oppose the Application in its current form at the OLT and to also attempt to negotiate a resolution of the Appeal based on revisions to the Original Proposal. Pursuant to Council's instructions, the City, along with the above-noted parties to the Appeal, participated in formal mediation in order to attempt to resolve the outstanding concerns regarding the Application. On October 28, 2021, the City Solicitor received a with prejudice settlement offer from the Applicant (the "With Prejudice Settlement Offer"). The With Prejudice Settlement Offer proposes to resolve the Appeal based on the following changes to the proposed development (the "Revised Proposal"), which are reflected in architectural plans dated June 8, 2021 inclusive (the "Revised Plans"): reduction in the overall building height from 27-storeys to 23-storeys (with a new overall metric height of 81 metres to the top of the mechanical penthouse); reduction in height and sculpting of the rooftop mechanical penthouse to reduce its visual and shadow impact; reduction in the number of surface vehicle parking spaces at the rear of the building from eleven (11) spaces to nine (9) spaces; reductions in the number of balconies on the east façade (from 5 per floor to 3 per floor) to reduce potential overlook impacts onto the residential properties in the adjacent Neighbourhoods designation; relocation of balconies from the corners of the building to reduce shadow impacts; relocation of internal and external amenity spaces to the west side of the building to eliminate impacts on residential properties to the east in the adjacent Neighbourhoods designation; inclusion of plantings along the perimeter of terraces and outdoor amenity areas and the reduction in the depth of the 2nd floor terraces on the east side of the building to reduce visual impact and prevent overlook; use of solid materials on east facing balconies to reduce overlook opportunities; inclusion of a dog run on the north end of the 2nd floor with screening to the east; reduced ground floor depth to accommodate a 1.2 metre landscaped area along the east property line, which is to be maintained by the Applicant; and the provision of a 7.5 metre wide paved public laneway which will form part of the eventual public laneway network connecting to Soudan Avenue, and will eventually provide access to sites designated Mixed Use Areas along Mount Pleasant Road. The With Prejudice Settlement Offer includes a community benefit cash contribution of $1.6 million, to be secured in a Section 37 Agreement, pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act. The City Solicitor requires further instructions regarding the With Prejudice Settlement Offer from City Council at its upcoming meeting on November 9 and 10, 2021, as the offer will expire at the end of the Council meeting. A copy of the With Prejudice Settlement Offer is contained as Public Attachment 1 to this Report. A copy of the Revised Plans are also included as Public Attachment 2 to this Report.

Staff recommended

The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the confidential recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 2, 2021) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 2, 2021) from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council. 3. City Council direct

Show the rest of Staff recommended, 259 more characters as filed

that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 2, 2021) from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

    On the record

    The item as the City filed it

    More from this meeting

    The whole meeting