The filed record
0 Skeens Lane - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Michael Ford
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2021-03-10 · Toronto City Council · adopted
As filed
City Council on March 10, 2021, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, along with appropriate City staff, to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal hearing in order to oppose the variance requested in Application A0252/20EYK respecting 0 Skeens Lane, in particular as the variance is premature in the absence of a related Official Plan Amendment application.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
The Applicant has applied to the Committee of Adjustment (Application A0252/20EYK) (the "Application") for a variance to the applicable Zoning By-law to permit the addition of nine (9) supplementary visitor parking spaces for the adjacent 5-storey mixed-use condominium development at 3418 Lake Shore Boulevard West on a different lot at 0 Skeens Lane (the "Subject Property"). The Subject Property is designated Neighbourhoods in the Toronto Official Plan on Map 15, whereas 3418 Lake Shore Boulevard West and the 5-storey condominium building is designated Mixed-Use Areas on Map 15.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 3,256 more characters as filed
The Subject Property was included as part of a previous minor variance application and related site plan application for the 5-storey mixed use condominium building at 3418 Lake Shore Boulevard West (together the "Original Application"). The minor variance component of the Original Application was refused by the Committee of Adjustment on April 12, 2018, and both the minor variance and site plan applications were subsequently appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal. The Original Application initially proposed parking spaces in Skeens Lane on the same Subject Property. City Planning staff opposed the inclusion of parking spaces on the Subject Property because the Neighbourhoods policies in the Official Plan do not provide for uses accessory to the Mixed Use Areas, such as parking spaces, to be accommodated on abutting Neighbourhoods designated lands. As a result, the parking spaces as proposed were not supportable in the absence of a related Official Plan Amendment application, which had not been submitted. A settlement of the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal appeal of the Original Application was reached between the Applicant and the City. As part of that settlement, the Original Application was revised to remove the proposed parking spaces on the Subject Property in Skeens Lane, and a related variance permitting a reduction of the residential and commercial parking spaces required for the development was supported by both the Applicant and the City (the "2019 Settlement"). The 2019 Settlement of the variance appeal was approved by the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal in its written decision and order dated January 8, 2019 (the "2019 Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Decision"). As part of that settlement, the site plan application was adjourned sine die to allow the Applicant to continue working with the City to provide revised site plan drawings and appropriate conditions of approval reflecting the revised proposal. Despite the 2019 Settlement reached between the City and the Applicant regarding the appeal of the Original Application, which specifically removed parking spaces in Skeens Lane as a term of the settlement, the Applicant has now brought forward a new Minor Variance Application to again allow parking spaces related to the condominium building at 3418 Lake Shore Boulevard on the Subject Property. City Planning staff remain opposed to the new Minor Variance Application. City Planning submitted a report to the Committee of Adjustment dated September 29, 2020 recommending that the Application be deferred until such time as a related Official Plan Amendment application is submitted by the Applicant. In the absence of such an Official Plan Amendment application, staff recommended the minor variance be refused. At its hearing on November 24, 2020, the Committee of Adjustment refused the Application. A copy of the Notice of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment is attached. The Applicant has now appealed the Committee of Adjustment Decision to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (File PL210019). This Motion will give the City Solicitor, along with other appropriate City Staff, authority to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal in order to oppose the variance requested in the Application.
Staff recommended
Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Michael Ford recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, along with appropriate City staff, to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal hearing in order to oppose the variance requested in Application Number A0252/20EYK respecting 0 Skeens Lane, in particular as the variance is premature in the absence of a related Official Plan Amendment application.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming BillsFiled record
- External Compliance Audit Reports for the Integrity Commissioner, Lobbyist Registrar and Ombudsman Offices for the Year Ended December 31, 2019Filed record
- Swiss Challenge Negotiated Request for Proposals for a Digital Government PlatformFiled record
- 1390 Weston Road - Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Liquor Licence Application - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Ana BailãoFiled record
- Call to OrderFiled record
- Reviewing City of Toronto Policies Governing the Use of Libraries and City Facilities by Individuals and Groups Promoting Intolerance or DiscriminationFiled record