The filed record
Urgently Requesting Transparent Public Consultation and Consideration of Alternative Options for the Ontario Line Maintenance and Storage Facility - by Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2021-05-05 · Toronto City Council · adopted
As filed
City Council on May 5 and 6, 2021, adopted the following: 1. City Council express significant concerns about the impacts the proposed Maintenance and Storage Facility site would have on the Thorncliffe Park neighbourhood. 2. City Council direct the City Manager to convey to Metrolinx the following requests related to the proposed Ontario Line Maintenance and Storage Facility site: a. that Metrolinx engage the community in a transparent public consultation process that is inclusive of all Thorncliffe Park residents, providing translation services and tailored outreach as needed; and b.
Show the rest of As filed, 49 more characters as filed
that Metrolinx consider alternative site options.
The vote
Adopt Item · Carried, 23-0
The whole record, all 26 members
- Ana BailãoFor
- Anthony PerruzzaFor
- Brad BradfordFor
- Cynthia LaiFor
- Denzil Minnan-WongFor
- Frances NunziataFor
- Gary CrawfordFor
- Gord PerksFor
- James PasternakFor
- Jaye RobinsonFor
- Jennifer McKelvieFor
- Joe CressyFor
- John FilionFor
- John ToryFor
- Josh MatlowAbsent
- Kristyn Wong-TamFor
- Mark GrimesAbsent
- Michael FordFor
- Michael ThompsonFor
- Mike ColleFor
- Mike LaytonFor
- Nick MantasFor
- Paul AinslieFor
- Paula FletcherAbsent
- Shelley CarrollFor
- Stephen HolydayFor
Every name opens that member’s record.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
Without prior public consultation, Metrolinx announced the proposed location of the Ontario Line Maintenance and Storage Facility in Thorncliffe Park through a blog post on April 8, 2021. The subsequent community meeting did not provide an opportunity for open, transparent dialogue. Comments and questions were limited to a 160 character chat box. Translation services were not provided and promotional materials were printed only in English.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,126 more characters as filed
Despite these barriers, more than 500 community members were in attendance and 747 questions and comments were submitted through the chat box. The proposed Maintenance and Storage Facility would directly impact what many consider to be the cultural centre of the Thorncliffe Park neighbourhood, including the local halal grocer, place of worship, and several small businesses and community services. The proposed site will be 175,000 square metres, equal to approximately 24 soccer fields. Thorncliffe Park is a geographically small neighbourhood that is home to a large and diverse community. Their voices need to be heard as part of this process. The Thorncliffe Park neighbourhood deserves access to rapid transit, but not at the expense of important cultural institutions, community services, and local businesses. This Motion is urgent because it relates to Metrolinx's recently-announced Ontario Line Maintenance and Storage Facility location and the significant impacts it would have on the Thorncliffe Park neighbourhood. Public consultation must be undertaken as soon as possible to address urgent community concerns.
Staff recommended
Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that: 1. City Council express significant concerns about the impacts the proposed Maintenance and Storage Facility site would have on the Thorncliffe Park neighbourhood. 2. City Council direct the City Manager to convey to Metrolinx the following requests related to the proposed Ontario Line Maintenance and Storage Facility site: a. that Metrolinx engage the community in a transparent public consultation process that is inclusive of all Thorncliffe Park residents, providing translation services and tailored outreach as needed; and b.
Show the rest of Staff recommended, 49 more characters as filed
that Metrolinx consider alternative site options.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming BillsFiled record
- Ombudsman Toronto 2020 Annual ReportFiled record
- 206 Russell Hill Road - Request for Directions Regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal HearingFiled record
- Representation at a Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing for 140 Divadale Drive - by Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Mike ColleFiled record
- Call to OrderFiled record
- Appointment of Public Members to the Seniors Housing Corporation BoardFiled record