The Public GalleryToronto

Toronto City Council · 2021-06-08 · 2021.MM34.33

The filed record

Representation at a Toronto Local Appeal Tribunal hearing for 75 Canterbury Place - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

The decision

2021-06-08 · Toronto City Council · adopted

As filed

City Council on June 8 and 9, 2021, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appeal the May 27, 2021 decision of the North York Panel of the Committee of Adjustment regarding Application A0215/21NY respecting 75 Canterbury Place to the Toronto Local Appeal Body and direct the City Solicitor, and any other appropriate City staff, to attend any subsequent hearing of the appeal. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.

Show the rest of As filed, 291 more characters as filed

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeal and, if a resolution is reached, to settle the appeal at the City Solicitor's discretion, and in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

The vote

Adopt Item · Carried, 25-0

For (25)Ana Bailão, Anthony Perruzza, Brad Bradford, Cynthia Lai, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Frances Nunziata, Gary Crawford, Gord Perks, James Pasternak, Jaye Robinson, Jennifer McKelvie, Joe Cressy, John Filion, Josh Matlow, Kristyn Wong-Tam, Mark Grimes, Michael Ford, Michael Thompson, Mike Colle, Mike Layton, Nick Mantas, Paul Ainslie, Paula Fletcher, Shelley Carroll, Stephen Holyday
Absent (1)John Tory
The whole record, all 26 members

Every name opens that member’s record.

On the agenda

As the city filed it

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment (Application A0215/21NY) (the "Application") for minor variances to permit the conversion of unused space within underground garage levels to storage space, and for revised dimensions for required bicycle parking spaces, all within a building currently under construction that was the subject of a previous zoning and site plan approval at the Ontario Municipal Board.

Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,642 more characters as filed

The applicant has requested variances for an exception to the calculation of gross floor area and for the minimum dimensions for a bicycle parking space under former North York Zoning By-law 7625. Community Planning staff do not support the application. On May 18, 2021, Community Planning staff for the North York District wrote a report to the Committee of Adjustment recommending that the minor variances be refused. Staff recommended refusal of the minor variances because the proposed additional gross floor area fails to meet the intent of the secondary plan policies, including the provision of benefits where additional density beyond the secondary plan limits is requested. Staff also cited the Application's failure to meet the four tests under section 45(1) of the Planning Act. In addition, Community Planning staff recommended that, should the Application be approved, the Committee of Adjustment's decision be conditional on the provision of a cash contribution to the City by the applicant in accordance with secondary plan density policies. At its hearing on May 27, 2021, the Committee of Adjustment approved the Application and did not impose a condition requiring a cash contribution in exchange for the increase in density. A copy of the Notice of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment is attached. This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor to appeal the Decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Board in order to oppose the proposed minor variances requested in the Application. This Motion will also give the City Solicitor authority to negotiate a settlement of the appeal and retain outside consultants as necessary.

Staff recommended

Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appeal the May 27, 2021 decision of the North York Panel of the Committee of Adjustment regarding Application A0215/21NY respecting 75 Canterbury Place to the Toronto Local Appeal Body and direct the City Solicitor, and any other appropriate City staff, to attend any subsequent hearing of the appeal.

Show the rest of Staff recommended, 380 more characters as filed

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeal and, if a resolution is reached, to settle the appeal at the City Solicitor's discretion, and in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

    On the record

    The item as the City filed it

    More from this meeting

    The whole meeting