The filed record
86 Foch Avenue - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Michael Ford
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2021-12-15 · Toronto City Council · adopted
As filed
City Council on December 15, 16 and 17, 2021, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, and any other appropriate City Staff, to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in respect of 86 Foch Avenue to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the Applicant's proposed development (Committee of Adjustment Application Number A0112/21EYK). 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment seeking permission to construct a new detached dwelling with an attached garage at 86 Foch Avenue (Application Number A0112/21EYK). In particular, the applicant seeks variances from City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 and Etobicoke Zoning By-law 1979-67, including variances for lot coverage, gross floor area, front yard setback, rear yard setback, window projection, basement grade, and dwelling height.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,229 more characters as filed
On August 26, 2021, the Etobicoke York District Panel of the Committee of Adjustment refused to grant the requested variances (copy attached). The applicant has appealed the refusal to the Toronto Local Appeal Body. A hearing has been scheduled for February 14, 2022. Community Planning staff do not support the application. On August 18, 2021, Community Planning for the Etobicoke York District wrote a report to the Committee of Adjustment recommending that the minor variances be refused (copy attached). Staff recommend refusal of the minor variances because the proposed massing and scale of the dwelling would not be in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-laws, and would not respect nor reinforce the prevailing character of the neighbourhood. Urban Forestry staff also wrote to the Committee of Adjustment on April 19, 2021 recommending refusal of the application because the proposed development would require the removal of by-law protected trees (copy attached). This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor to oppose the applicant's Toronto Local Appeal Body appeal and to secure the necessary authorization and resources to support the City's opposition to the appeal.
Staff recommended
Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Michael Ford, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, and any other appropriate City Staff, to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in respect of 86 Foch Avenue to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the Applicant's proposed development (Committee of Adjustment Application Number A0112/21EYK). 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming BillsFiled record
- COVID-19 Intergovernmental Funding UpdateFiled record
- Affordable and Accessible Childcare for All - Update on Federal-Provincial Negotiations - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Michael ThompsonFiled record
- Thomas Clark Way ExtensionFiled record
- Request the Government of Ontario Help to Stop Out-of-Control Housing Prices by Imposing a Home Speculation and Home Flipping Tax - by Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor John FilionFiled record
- Call to OrderFiled record