The Public GalleryToronto

Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal · 2021-06-14 · 2021.NM3.1

The filed record

Administrative Penalty Tribunal - Selection of Candidates for Interview

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

The decision

2021-06-14 · Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal · amended

As filed

The Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal: 1. Selected the following candidates for interview at its next meeting for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal: APT2-88 APT2-96 APT2-103 APT2-105 APT2-111 APT2-114 APT2-116 APT2-131 APT2-140 APT2-141 APT2-148 APT2-149 APT2-152 APT2-154 APT2-155 APT2-156 APT2-157 APT2-158 APT2-164 APT2-165 APT2-168 APT2-180 APT2-184 APT2-186 APT2-190 APT2-197 APT2-207 APT2-211 APT2-212 APT2-214 APT2-217 APT2-218 APT2-219 APT2-220 APT2-221 APT2-223 APT2-224 APT2-232 APT2-234 2.

Show the rest of As filed, 272 more characters as filed

Directed that Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (May 31, 2021) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal.

On the agenda

As the city filed it

The Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal will select candidates for interview for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal. Following interviews, the Nominating Panel will recommend 19 candidates to City Council for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal, including one as Chair.

Staff recommended

The City Clerk recommends that: 1. The Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal select 38 candidates listed in Table 1 of Confidential Attachment 1 for interview at its next meeting for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal. 2. The Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and 2 remain confidential in their

Show the rest of Staff recommended, 147 more characters as filed

entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal.

    On the record

    The item as the City filed it