The filed record
Request for Directions Report - 860 Pharmacy Avenue, 9 to 23 and 32 to 40 Craigton Drive, and 1 Rannock Street - Official Plan Amendment Application
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2021-05-05 · Toronto City Council · adopted
As filed
City Council on May 5 and 6, 2021, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with appropriate staff and/or external consultants as may be appropriate, to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal hearing to oppose the applicant's appeal respecting the Official Plan Amendment application (Application 19 251045 ESC 21 OZ) for the lands at 860 Pharmacy Avenue, 9 to 23 and 32 to 40 Craigton Drive, and 1 Rannock Street, for the reasons contained in the report (March 25, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.
Show the rest of As filed, 1,505 more characters as filed
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve the outstanding issues detailed in the report (March 25, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, and to support a revised proposal that is generally consistent with Official Plan Amendment 499 for the lands at 860 Pharmacy Avenue, 9 to 23 and 32 to 40 Craigton Drive, and 1 Rannock Street, and report back to City Council on the outcome of discussions, if necessary. 3. City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the owner of the subject lands to address the preliminary issues related to infrastructure required to support the anticipated growth in the overall context of the Golden Mile Secondary Plan area, including streets, density, servicing, parks, and community service facilities which are to be assessed comprehensively, including coordination with other Golden Mile Secondary Plan landowners. 4. In the event the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal allows the subject appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to withhold the issuance of any Order on the Official Plan Amendment appeal for the subject lands until such time as the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed Official Plan Amendment is in a form and with content satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
This application proposes to maintain the existing Apartment Neighbourhoods designation and amend the Official Plan to add a Site and Area-Specific Policy ("SASP") for the property at 860 Pharmacy Avenue, 9 to 23 and 32 to 40 Craigton, Drive and 1 Rannock Street (see Attachment 1: Location Map) to permit a mixed-use development including a new public street and open space. The subject lands are located within the Golden Mile Secondary Plan ("GMSP") area approved through Official Plan Amendment No.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,240 more characters as filed
499 ("OPA 499"), and are also subject to new Golden Mile Urban Design Guidelines, as adopted by City Council on October 30, 2020. The application was submitted on November 19, 2019 and has been appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT") citing City Council's failure to make a decision within the prescribed time frames set out in the Planning Act. The appeal was filed on November 3, 2020, during the COVID-19 state of emergency. The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's direction for the City Solicitor, together with appropriate City staff and/or external consultants, to attend the LPAT hearing to oppose the subject application. City staff have concerns with the proposed Official Plan Amendment and are of the opinion the proposed amendment, in its current form is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) ("PPS"), does not conform with the A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020) ("Growth Plan (2020)"), and is not consistent with the general intent of and fails to conform with the Official Plan. Further the proposed amendment is not supportable, in its current form, in the context of OPA 499 and not consistent with the general intent or conform to OPA 499.
Staff recommended
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with appropriate staff and/or external consultants as may be appropriate, to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT") hearing to oppose the applicant's appeal respecting the Official Plan Amendment application (Application No. 19 251045 ESC 21 OZ) for the lands at 860 Pharmacy Avenue, 9 to 23 and 32 to 40 Craigton Drive, and 1 Rannock Street, for the reasons contained in the report dated March 25, 2021, from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.
Show the rest of Staff recommended, 1,484 more characters as filed
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve the outstanding issues detailed in the report dated March 25, 2021, from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, and to support a revised proposal that is generally consistent with Official Plan Amendment 499 ("OPA 499") for the lands at 860 Pharmacy Avenue, 9 to 23 and 32 to 40 Craigton Drive, and 1 Rannock Street, and report back to City Council on the outcome of discussions, if necessary. 3. City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the owner of the subject lands to address the preliminary issues related to infrastructure required to support the anticipated growth in the overall context of the Golden Mile Secondary Plan area, including streets, density, servicing, parks, and community service facilities which are to be assessed comprehensively, including coordination with other Golden Mile Secondary Plan landowners. 4. In the event the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT") allows the subject appeal in whole or in part, that City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the LPAT to withhold the issuance of any Order on the Official Plan Amendment appeal for the subject lands until such time as the LPAT has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed Official Plan Amendment is in a form and with content satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor.
Considered
2021-04-23 · Scarborough Community Council · adopted
Decision as filed
Scarborough Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with appropriate staff and/or external consultants as may be appropriate, to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT") hearing to oppose the applicant's appeal respecting the Official Plan Amendment application (Application No. 19 251045 ESC 21 OZ) for the lands at 860 Pharmacy Avenue, 9 to 23 and 32 to 40 Craigton Drive, and 1 Rannock Street, for the reasons contained in the report dated March 25, 2021, from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.
Show the rest of Decision as filed, 1,484 more characters as filed
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve the outstanding issues detailed in the report dated March 25, 2021, from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, and to support a revised proposal that is generally consistent with Official Plan Amendment 499 ("OPA 499") for the lands at 860 Pharmacy Avenue, 9 to 23 and 32 to 40 Craigton Drive, and 1 Rannock Street, and report back to City Council on the outcome of discussions, if necessary. 3. City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the owner of the subject lands to address the preliminary issues related to infrastructure required to support the anticipated growth in the overall context of the Golden Mile Secondary Plan area, including streets, density, servicing, parks, and community service facilities which are to be assessed comprehensively, including coordination with other Golden Mile Secondary Plan landowners. 4. In the event the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT") allows the subject appeal in whole or in part, that City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the LPAT to withhold the issuance of any Order on the Official Plan Amendment appeal for the subject lands until such time as the LPAT has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed Official Plan Amendment is in a form and with content satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor.
2021-05-05 · Toronto City Council · adopted
On the record
More from this meeting
- Final Report - 2180 Lawrence Avenue East - Zoning AmendmentFiled record
- Final Report - 1744 to 1750 Ellesmere Road - Class 4 Noise Area Classification (NPC-300)Filed record
- Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 3315 Midland AvenueFiled record
- Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Alterations to a Heritage Property, and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 2685 Kingston RoadFiled record
- Preliminary Report - 672 to 676 Birchmount Road - Zoning Amendment ApplicationFiled record
- Preliminary Report - 1891 Eglinton Avenue East - Zoning Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision ApplicationsFiled record