The filed record
Request for Fence Exemption - Rear yard - 79 Boardwalk Drive
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2021-02-24 · Toronto and East York Community Council · deferred
As filed
The Toronto and East York Community Council deferred consideration of the item until its April 21, 2021 meeting.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
This staff report is in regards to a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The purpose of this report is to consider an application submitted by the owner(s) of 79 Boardwalk Dr. for a site-specific Fence Exemption, pursuant to the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447- Fences. The property owner(s) is seeking Council's permission to be exempt from Chapter 447-1.2.B(1) - Fence height.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 554 more characters as filed
The subject property 79 Boardwalk Dr. is located in Ward 19, on a residentially zoned property. GENERAL LOCATION SPECIFIC LOCATION PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION & DEFICIENCY BY-LAW SECTION & REQUIREMENT Rear yard East, North and South side of property, rear yard. East - Existing wooden board on board fence between #79 & 81 Boardwalk Dr. to be increased in height to 2.44 metres. (8 Feet). North - existing gate is 2.44 metres high. (8 feet). South - Existing wooden board on board fence is 2.3 metres high (average height). Chapter 447-1.2.B(1) - Fence height.
Staff recommended
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council give consideration to the exemption application and decide to: 1. Refuse to grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 79 Boardwalk Drive, rear yard fence height, for failing to comply with the provisions of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447, Fences. OR 2. Grant the application for the rear yard fence to be built in excess of 2.0 metres without conditions.
Show the rest of Staff recommended, 260 more characters as filed
Direct and require that the installation be maintained in good repair without alteration. Direct and require that at such time as replacement of the fence is required, that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, or its successor by-law.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Permanent Closure of a Portion of the Western Terminus of Randolph AvenueFiled record
- Permanent Closure of the City-owned Public Lane Known as Brigden PlaceFiled record
- Naming of an Existing Public Lane in the Block Bounded by Hallam Street, Ossington Avenue, Northumberland Street and Concord AvenueFiled record
- Naming of an Existing Public Lane located in the Block Bounded by Yarmouth Road, Clinton Street, Follis Avenue and Christie StreetFiled record
- Naming of an existing Public Lane south of Eglinton Avenue West, extending between Flanders Road and Westover Hill RoadFiled record
- Naming of a Private Lane located north of Dundas Street East extending between Sumach Street and River StreetFiled record