The filed record
2872, 2880 and 2882 Kingston Road- Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Direction
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2022-03-09 · Toronto City Council · amended
As filed
City Council on March 9, 2022, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 2, 2022) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of: a. the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 2, 2022) from the City Solicitor, and City Council direct that that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 2, 2022) from the City Solicitor remain confidential as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege; and b.
Show the rest of As filed, 3,837 more characters as filed
Confidential Attachments 2 and 3 to the report (March 2, 2022) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council instruct the City Solicitor and City staff to consult with the local Councillor on any upgrades or solutions proposed by the Applicant to address City staff's concerns relating to sanitary sewer capacity. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 2, 2022) from the City Solicitor, were adopted by City Council and are now public as follows: 1. City Council accept the Settlement Offer dated March 1, 2022, in Confidential Attachment 2 to the report (March 2, 2022) from the City Solicitor and as generally shown on the Revised Plans in Confidential Attachment 3 to the report (March 2, 2022) from the City Solicitor, subject to Parts 2-5 below. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of the revised proposal as set out in the Settlement Offer dated March 1, 2022 in Confidential Attachment 2 to the report (March 2, 2022) from the City Solicitor and as generally shown on the Revised Plans in Confidential Attachment 3 to the report (March 2, 2022) from the City Solicitor, subject to Parts 3 and 4 below. 3. City Council instruct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing to request that a holding provision (H) be included in the final form of the Zoning By-law, to be lifted at such time that the following conditions have been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Toronto Water: a. upgrades of Wirral Sanitary Pumping Station and forcemain by the City have been constructed to solve the existing pumping station capacity constraints based on the findings of an Environmental Assessment; b. all local municipal infrastructure improvements or upgrades required to service the proposed development identified by the accepted Functional Servicing Report are secured or constructed; and c. the owner has entered into appropriate financially secured agreements to implement the required local infrastructure. 4. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Order until such time as: a. the Ontario Land Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendments are in a form satisfactory to the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District and the City Solicitor; and b. the City Solicitor confirms that the owner has provided a Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Stage 1 Report, a Hydrogeological Report and Summary Forms for each Report, acceptable to the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services. 5. In the event the Applicant agrees to the imposition of a holding (H) provision in accordance with Part 3 above, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to settle the appeal and attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of the development as shown on the Revised Plans in Confidential Attachment 3 to the report (March 2, 2022) from the City Solicitor in its entirety. 6. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any other City staff to take such actions as necessary to give effect to City Council's decision. Confidential Attachments 2 and 3 to the report (March 2, 2022) from the City Solicitor are now public and can be accessed under Background Information (City Council). The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 2, 2022) from the City Solicitor remains confidential in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
Artlife Developments (the "Applicant") is the owner of the property municipally known as 2872, 2880 and 2882 Kingston Road (the "Subject Site"). The Applicant applied for amendments to Cliffcrest Community By-law 9396 and City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 (the "Application") in order to facilitate a 10-storey mixed-use building containing 145 dwelling units and 295 square metres of ground floor commercial space with a total gross floor area of 9,437 square metres (the "Original Application").
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 355 more characters as filed
On March 10, 2021, City Council adopted the recommendations of Community Planning staff to refuse the Applications. The Applicant appealed City Council's decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal (the "OLT"). The appeal was assigned Case PL210208. In its decision dated October 6, 2021, the OLT set an 8-day hearing of the appeal to commence on June 28, 2022.
Staff recommended
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report. 2. If the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 are adopted by City Council, City Council authorize the public release of: a. the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 but that the remainder of Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege; and b. Confidential Attachments 2 and 3.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming BillsFiled record
- Response to COVID-19 - March 2022 Update to City CouncilFiled record
- Joint Appointment of Waterfront Toronto Chair - by Mayor John Tory, seconded by Councillor Joe CressyFiled record
- Call to OrderFiled record
- Appointment of Public Members to the Sign Variance CommitteeFiled record
- Renaming Underhill Park - by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, seconded by Mayor John ToryFiled record