The Public GalleryToronto

Toronto City Council · 2022-06-15 · 2022.MM45.15

The filed record

86, 88 and 90 Danforth Road - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

The decision

2022-06-15 · Toronto City Council · adopted

As filed

City Council on June 15 and 16, 2022, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body, with appropriate City staff in order to oppose the Appeal regarding the proposed development (Applications A0396/21SC, A0393/21SC and A0397/21SC) for 86, 88 and 90 Danforth Road. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the Appeal and,

Show the rest of As filed, 186 more characters as filed

if a resolution is reached, to settle the Appeal at the City Solicitor's discretion, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

On the agenda

As the city filed it

In 2020, the Committee of Adjustment, Scarborough Panel granted consent to sever the property located at 94 Danforth Road into three new lots and minor variances permitting the construction of a dwelling on each lot (B0020/19SC, the Decision on "Consent" is attached to this Motion). In 2021, the applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment seeking additional variances permitting the construction of a three-storey dwelling on each lot, now known by the municipal addresses 86, 88 and 90 Danforth Road, under the Zoning By-law 569-2013 (A0396/21SC, A0393/21SC and A0397/21SC) (collectively, the "Applications").

Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,235 more characters as filed

The Applications for 86 and 88 Danforth sought seven (7) variances from maximum height, maximum number of storeys, maximum exterior wall height, minimum lot frontage, minimum lot area, minimum building setback, minimum lot frontage and minimum eaves projection. The Application for 90 Danforth sought nine (9) variances in total: the same 7 variances as the adjacent properties, as well as variances for minimum rear yard setback and minimum soft landscaping. City Planning staff submitted reports recommending refusal of the Applications in part (the reports are attached to this Motion). Staff concluded that the Applications do not reinforce the physical character of the neighbourhood, among other concerns. Staff expressed particular concern with the height of the proposed dwellings. In its decision of March 28, 2022, the Committee of Adjustment refused three (3) height-related variances for each property and granted the remaining variances (the "Decisions" included). The Decisions have been appealed to the Toronto Local Appeal Body by the applicant (the "Appeal"). This Motion will authorize and direct the City Solicitor to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body, along with appropriate staff, in order to oppose the Appeal.

Staff recommended

Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body, with appropriate City staff in order to oppose the Appeal regarding the proposed development (Applications A0396/21SC, A0393/21SC and A0397/21SC) for 86, 88 and 90 Danforth Road. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution

Show the rest of Staff recommended, 205 more characters as filed

of the Appeal and, if a resolution is reached, to settle the Appeal at the City Solicitor's discretion, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

    On the record

    The item as the City filed it

    More from this meeting

    The whole meeting