The Public GalleryToronto

Toronto City Council · 2022-07-19 · 2022.MM47.109

The filed record

48 Teddington Park Avenue - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

The decision

2022-07-19 · Toronto City Council · adopted

As filed

City Council on July 19, 20, 21 and 22, 2022, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in opposition to the minor variances applications respecting 48 Teddington Park Avenue (Application A0094/22NY). 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution regarding the Application and Appeal, and City Council

Show the rest of As filed, 215 more characters as filed

authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the matter on behalf of the City, in the City Solicitor's discretion, after consulting with the Ward Councillor and with the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

On the agenda

As the city filed it

This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor, along with appropriate City Staff, to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in order to oppose the minor variance application made to the Committee of Adjustment respecting the property at 48 Teddington Park Avenue (Application A0094/22NY) (the "Application"). The Application seeks to construct a new three-storey detached dwelling, below grade garage extending into the rear yard and a connected two-storey structure with vehicular access from Glen Echo Road.

Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,565 more characters as filed

In total, the Application seeks eleven variances, which relate to floor space index, platforms on the rear wall, area of platforms, rear yard setback, building length, building depth, side yard setback, projection of eaves project, building height, and height of exterior main wall facing a side lot. In a report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, dated May 26, 2022, Planning staff opposed all variances. Planning staff opined that the approval of the minor variances would result in development that is not in keeping with the physical character of the neighbourhood. Planning staff also stated that the proposed structure connected to the main dwelling below-grade would result in a built form that is excessive and would not meet the intent of the Zoning By-law regulating the location and scale of structures on a lot. Planning staff stated that the proposed minor variances as a whole would result in a development that does not maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan or Zoning By-law. The Committee of Adjustment refused the variances in its decision dated June 2, 2022 (the "Committee of Adjustment Decision"). A copy of the Committee of Adjustment Decision is attached to this Motion. The Committee of Adjustment Decision was appealed to the Toronto Local Appeal Body by the Owner. This Motion will give the City Solicitor authority to oppose the Application at the Toronto Local Appeal Body. In addition, this Motion will give the City Solicitor authority to attempt to negotiate a settlement of the Appeals.

Staff recommended

Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Colle, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in opposition to the minor variances applications respecting 48 Teddington Park Avenue (Application A0094/22NY). 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution regarding the Application and Appeal, and City Council

Show the rest of Staff recommended, 217 more characters as filed

authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the matter on behalf of the City, in the City Solicitor's discretion, after consulting with the Ward Councillor and with the Director of Community Planning, North York District.

    On the record

    The item as the City filed it

    More from this meeting

    The whole meeting