The filed record
98 Bogert Avenue - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2022-07-19 · Toronto City Council · adopted
As filed
City Council on July 19, 20, 21 and 22, 2022, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in support of the Committee of Adjustment's decisions refusing the Applications regarding 98 Bogert Avenue (Applications B0017/21NY, A0296/21NY, A0297/21NY), with appropriate City staff, in order to oppose the consent and minor variances requested in Applications B0017/21NY, A0296/21NY, A0297/21NY regarding 98 Bogert Avenue.
Show the rest of As filed, 412 more characters as filed
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement of the appeal of the Decisions in Applications B0017/21NY, A0296/21NY, A0297/21NY respecting 98 Bogert Avenue and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City at the City Solicitor's discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and with the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
This Motion will give the City Solicitor authority, along with appropriate City Staff, to attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body in support of the Committee of Adjustment's decisions refusing the consent and minor variance applications at 98 Bogert Avenue (Applications B0017/21NY, A0296/21NY, A0297/21NY) (the "Applications"), in order to oppose the Applications. The Applications seeks a consent to sever the property at 98 Bogert Avenue into two undersized residential lots and construct a new dwelling on each of two the newly-created lots.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,833 more characters as filed
The Applications require a total of 9 minor variances to City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 and former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 for each of the two proposed new dwellings. The variances relate to minimum lot area, minimum lot frontage, lot coverage, side yard setback, front yard setback, building height, and minimum side yard setback for non-encroaching platforms. In a report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District dated July 26, 2021, Community Planning Staff raised concerns with respect to the Applications and recommended that the Applications be refused. A copy of the Planning Report is attached. Planning Staff opined that the requested consent to sever fails to satisfy the consent criteria under Section 51(24) of the Planning Act and that the requested minor variance applications do not meet the four tests for minor variance under s. 45(1) of the Planning Act. In particular, Community Planning Staff opined that the Applications fail to respect and reinforce the character of the neighbourhood and that they do not satisfy the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. On June 23, 2022, the Committee of Adjustment issued decisions refusing the Applications, finding that the proposed severance did not satisfy the requirements of s. 51(24) of the Planning Act, and that the proposed variances failed each of the four tests for minor variance under s. 45(1) of the Planning Act (the "Decisions"). The Decisions are attached. This Motion will direct the City Solicitor to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in order to oppose the Applications. This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the deadline to request party status at the Toronto Local Appeal Body, although not yet set, is anticipated to fall between July City Council and August City Council.
Staff recommended
Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in support of the Committee of Adjustment's decisions refusing the Applications regarding 98 Bogert Avenue (Applications B0017/21NY, A0296/21NY, A0297/21NY), with appropriate City staff, in order to oppose the consent and minor variances requested in Applications B0017/21NY, A0296/21NY, A0297/21NY regarding 98 Bogert Avenue.
Show the rest of Staff recommended, 414 more characters as filed
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement of the appeal of the Decisions in Applications B0017/21NY, A0296/21NY, A0297/21NY respecting 98 Bogert Avenue and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City at the City Solicitor's discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and with the Director of Community Planning, North York District.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming BillsFiled record
- Appointment of Interim City ManagerFiled record
- Ontario Land Tribunal Appeal of Official Plan Amendment 231 - 87 Ethel Avenue - Request for DirectionsFiled record
- Voluntary Community Benefits Plans - by Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor Ana BailãoFiled record
- Call to OrderFiled record
- Ombudsman Toronto Interim Report: Investigation into the City's Processes for Clearing Encampments in 2021Filed record