Compliance Audit Application by Kevin Wiener for the Election Campaign Finances of Keiosha Ross

3. The Applicant provided information to the Committee to support the Applicant's belief that the Respondent contravened provisions of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 relating to election campaign finances. 4. The Applicant raised concerns relating to the Respondent's compliance with the Act. In particular these related to: a. That the Respondent received $0 in campaign contributions and incurred $400 in expenses and that the Respondent did not use a campaign account; and b. That the Respondent did not record "self-funded" contributions. 5. The Committee then provided the Respondent with the opportunity to respond. The Respondent was not present at the hearing and did not provide submissions to the Committee. 6. The Committee has discretion to determine whether to grant or reject an application. After consideration of the evidence provided, the Committee concluded that there were breaches of the Act. Due to the level of materiality of the breaches and the limited nature of the breaches, a compliance audit is not warranted as an audit would not provide any further clarity about the breaches. 7. The failure of the Respondent to provide information to the Committee and the nature of the alleged breaches raises concerns. The participation of the Respondent in this proceeding would have been very helpful to the process and would have assisted in ensuring transparency and openness in understanding the Respondent's campaign finances. 8. This application process has provided information and public scrutiny to the Candidate's finances and the Committee does not believe that an audit would further the public interest. 9. For the reasons stated above and in accordance with s. 88.33(7) of the Act the Committee rejected the Compliance Audit Application of Kevin Wiener for a compliance audit of the Election Campaign Finances of the Respondent, Keiosha Ross.