The filed record
Selection of Candidates for the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2023-11-14 · Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal · amended
As filed
The Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal: 1. Selected the following candidates for interview at its next meeting for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal: Candidate DDR1-156 Candidate DDR1-129 Candidate DDR1-148 Candidate DDR1-157 Candidate DDR1-151 Candidate DDR1-117 Candidate DDR1-144 Candidate DDR1-143 2. Directed that Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (October 31, 2023) from the
Show the rest of As filed, 185 more characters as filed
City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
The Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal must select candidates to interview at its next meeting for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal. Following the interviews, the Nominating Panel will recommend two candidates to City Council for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal.
Staff recommended
The City Clerk recommends that: 1. The Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal select 6 candidates listed in Confidential Attachment 1 for interview at its next meeting for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal. 2. The Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 remain confidential in its entirety as it relates
Show the rest of Staff recommended, 121 more characters as filed
to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal.