The filed record
Request for Review of Signs: Site-Specific Amendment Process
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2023-10-26 · Planning and Housing Committee · adopted
As filed
The Planning and Housing Committee: 1. Directed the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to conduct a review of the provisions of Chapter 694, Signs, General, concerning site-specific amendments; the review to in particular consider, the circumstances set out in section 694-31A of Chapter 694 which enable an application for a site-specific amendment to be made; and, to report back to the February
Show the rest of As filed, 599 more characters as filed
28, 2024 Planning and Housing Committee with recommendations concerning potential amendments to Chapter 694, Signs, General, as may be required to ensure that the process regulating site-specific amendment applications is an effective use of City Council resources, and that the site-specific amendment applications submitted for consideration by City Council are reflective of the intended scope of the site-specific amendment process; rather than be matters which are in whole, or in part, matters which substantively were intended to be delegated to the Sign Variance Committee for consideration.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
A number of general concerns have been raised regarding the intended scope of the Sign by-law site-specific amendment process, which sees some applications being considered by Committee and City Council, rather than the Sign Variance Committee
Staff recommended
Councilor Gord Perks recommends to the Planning and Housing Committee that: 1. The Planning and Housing Committee direct the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to conduct a review of the provisions of Chapter 694, Signs, General, concerning site-specific amendments; the review to in particular consider, the circumstances set out in section 694-31A of Chapter 694 which enable an application
Show the rest of Staff recommended, 677 more characters as filed
for a site-specific amendment to be made; and, to report back to the February 28, 2024 Planning and Housing Committee with recommendations concerning potential amendments to Chapter 694, Signs, General, as may be required to ensure that the process regulating site-specific amendment applications is an effective use of City Council resources, and that the site-specific amendment applications submitted for consideration by City Council are reflective of the intended scope of the site-specific amendment process; rather than be matters which are in whole, or in part, matters which substantively were intended to be delegated to the Sign Variance Committee for consideration.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Housing Now - 140 Merton Street - Zoning By-law Amendment- Decision Report - ApprovalFiled record
- Review of Zoning Regulations for Outdoor Patios on Private PropertyFiled record
- City-Initiated Zoning By-law Amendments to Implement Ontario Line - Final ReportFiled record
- 2 and 80 Union Street (St. Clair-Old Weston SmartTrack/GO Station) - City-Initiated Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - ApprovalFiled record
- Housing Now - Parkdale Hub - 1303, 1313, 1325, 1337, 1345 Queen Street West and 212, 220, 224 Cowan Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments, and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Decision Report - ApprovalFiled record
- Concept 2 Keys Priority Development Review Stream Dashboard: October 2023 UpdateFiled record