The filed record
Legal Advice Regarding Rogers’ Application to Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2024-10-09 · Toronto City Council · adopted
As filed
City Council on October 9 and 10, 2024, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 2, 2024) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 2, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential in its entirety as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Show the rest of As filed, 651 more characters as filed
3. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 2, 2024) from the City Solicitor, at the discretion of the City Solicitor. Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 2, 2024) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 2, 2024) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
Rogers Communications Canada Inc. and the City of Ottawa have been negotiating the terms of a municipal access agreement, an agreement containing the terms upon which Rogers is permitted to install, maintain, and replace its infrastructure in the municipal right-of-way. Rogers filed an application with the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission on the basis that it was not able to reach agreement with Ottawa as to some important terms of the municipal access agreement; it asks the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission to approve Rogers' preferred terms in the municipal access agreement and require Ottawa to incorporate those terms in their municipal access agreement.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 563 more characters as filed
The City is also in the process of negotiating a new municipal access agreement with Rogers regarding the installation, maintenance, and replacement of its infrastructure in the public highway in Toronto. Some of the proposed terms in the municipal access agreement between Rogers and Ottawa are the same as or similar to terms proposed by Rogers in respect of its municipal access agreement with the City. Confidential Attachment 1 provides further information and advice regarding Rogers' Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission application.
Staff recommended
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in the Confidential Attachment. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff contained in Confidential Attachment 1, at the discretion of the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential in its entirety as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Introduction of General Bills and Confirming BillsFiled record
- Appointment of a Toronto Integrity CommissionerFiled record
- Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds from 193-195 McCaul Street and 316 Bloor Street West Developments to the Housing Secretariat for the Affordable Housing Project at 35 Bellevue Avenue - by Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Amber MorleyFiled record
- Call to OrderFiled record
- Ombudsman Toronto's Investigation into the Toronto Police Service's Communications About its Vulnerable Persons RegistryFiled record
- Credible Maximum Fines for Offences Contrary to Toronto Municipal Code - by Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Jon BurnsideFiled record