The filed record
The Future of Visitor Parking - by Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2024-05-22 · Toronto City Council · referred
As filed
City Council on May 22 and 23, 2024, referred Motion MM18.17 to the Planning and Housing Committee for consideration.
The vote
Waive Referral · Lost, 15-9
The whole record, all 25 members
- Alejandra BravoAgainst
- Amber MorleyFor
- Anthony PerruzzaFor
- Ausma MalikFor
- Brad BradfordFor
- Chris MoiseAgainst
- Dianne SaxeAgainst
- Frances NunziataAgainst
- Gord PerksAgainst
- Jamaal MyersFor
- James PasternakFor
- Jennifer McKelvieFor
- Jon BurnsideFor
- Josh MatlowFor
- Lily ChengFor
- Michael ThompsonAbsent
- Mike ColleFor
- Nick MantasAgainst
- Olivia ChowFor
- Parthi KandavelFor
- Paul AinslieAgainst
- Paula FletcherAgainst
- Shelley CarrollAgainst
- Stephen HolydayFor
- Vincent CrisantiFor
Every name opens that member’s record.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
Increasingly new developments are being approved with minimal visitor parking. This will present some foreseeable challenges, especially in the suburbs where there is neither permitted street parking, nor sufficient public parking lots available. While owners choose to purchase a unit with or without a parking spot, they cannot choose whether friends and family live near enough to transit to visit without the use of a car.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,220 more characters as filed
Having sufficient visitor parking is very important to ensure that people with visitors have somewhere for their visitors to park. Further, we want to ensure there is sufficient visitor parking to encourage social interactions rather than presenting visitor parking challenges that could exacerbate the already serious social isolation that is happening in our city. For example, recently a developer in Willowdale proposed a 44-storey tower with 513 units with only 7 visitor parking spots, which we negotiated up to 14 spots. I believe this will still be too low to meet the demand of the residents of the building in an inner-suburb context. The impact of limited visitor parking will spill over to the surrounding areas resulting in illegal parking or having no parking left for visitors of those who live in longstanding surrounding communities. Taxpayers will have to absorb the costs of dealing with these challenges created by the cost savings enjoyed by developers in offering limited visitor parking in new high-density developments. This motion requests staff to look into the greater need for visitor parking in suburban wards as part of their ongoing review of the parking requirements in the Zoning By-law.
Staff recommended
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, recommends that: 1. City Council request the Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the President, Toronto Parking Authority, to consider the greater need for visitor parking in suburban contexts compared to downtown as part of the ongoing review of the parking requirements in the Zoning By-law and consider the potential impact of Bill 185 in their analysis, and report back no later than the fourth quarter of 2024.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Introduction of General Bills and Confirming BillsFiled record
- 294-298 Sherbourne Street - Request for DirectionsFiled record
- Yonge-Dundas Square Renaming InitiativeFiled record
- Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds for Essential Structural Work to the Community Non-Profit Affordable Rental Housing Building at 1501 Queen Street West - by Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma MalikFiled record
- Call to OrderFiled record
- 10-18 Abitibi Avenue - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for DirectionsFiled record