The Public GalleryToronto

Toronto City Council · 2025-06-25 · 2025.MM31.1

The filed record

36 Romeo Street - Request for the City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

The decision

2025-06-25 · Toronto City Council · adopted

As filed

City Council on June 25 and 26, 2025, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decisions regarding 36 Romeo Street (Applications B0048/24EYK, A0015/25EYK, and A0016/25EYK). 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt

Show the rest of As filed, 326 more characters as filed

to negotiate a resolution of the appeal regarding 36 Romeo Street (Applications B0048/24EYK, A0015/25EYK, and A0016/25EYK), and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City at their discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

The vote

On the agenda

As the city filed it

The Applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment to obtain a consent to sever the property municipally known as 36 Romeo Street into two residential lots (Application B0048/24EYK), and to request variances from City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 (Applications A0015/25EYK and A0016/25EYK) to construct a new dwelling on each of the newly created lots (the "Applications"). On April 17, 2025, the Etobicoke York District Panel of the Committee of Adjustment refused the Applications.

Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,078 more characters as filed

Copies of the Committee's decisions are attached as Attachment 1. The applicant has appealed the refusal to the Toronto Local Appeal Body (the "Appeal"). The Applications require variances to By-law 569-2013, including but not limited to: lot frontage, lot area, lot coverage, floor space index, side yard setback, dwelling length, number of storeys, main wall height, roof eave projection, number of platforms, platform size, and driveway width. For the City to continue to effectively assess its case, the City Solicitor requires the expertise of an external consultant to advise on the applicant's proposed plan, and to potentially make recommendations respecting a solution. This Motion will authorize and direct the City Solicitor to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body, along with retained outside consultants, in order to oppose the Appeal. This Motion will also authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the matter on behalf of the City in their discretion. This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the Applications have been appealed to the Toronto Local Appeal Body.

Staff recommended

Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decisions regarding 36 Romeo Street (Applications B0048/24EYK, A0015/25EYK, and A0016/25EYK). 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary. 3. City Council authorize the

Show the rest of Staff recommended, 352 more characters as filed

City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeal regarding 36 Romeo Street (Applications B0048/24EYK, A0015/25EYK, and A0016/25EYK), and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City at their discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

    On the record

    The item as the City filed it

    More from this meeting

    The whole meeting