The filed record
Review of Automated Speed Enforcement (ASE) Ticket Appeals Process - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Anthony Perruzza
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2025-07-23 · Toronto City Council · referred
As filed
City Council on July 23 and 24, 2025, referred Motion MM32.17 to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee for consideration.
The vote
Waive Referral · Lost, 15-8
The whole record, all 25 members
- Alejandra BravoAgainst
- Amber MorleyFor
- Anthony PerruzzaAbsent
- Ausma MalikFor
- Brad BradfordFor
- Chris MoiseFor
- Dianne SaxeAgainst
- Frances NunziataFor
- Gord PerksAgainst
- Jamaal MyersFor
- James PasternakFor
- Jon BurnsideAgainst
- Josh MatlowFor
- Lily ChengFor
- Michael ThompsonFor
- Mike ColleAgainst
- Nick MantasFor
- Olivia ChowFor
- Parthi KandavelFor
- Paul AinslieAgainst
- Paula FletcherAbsent
- Rachel Chernos LinAgainst
- Shelley CarrollAgainst
- Stephen HolydayFor
- Vincent CrisantiFor
Every name opens that member’s record.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
Road safety is of vital importance to the City of Toronto. Our Vision Zero strategy includes a number of measures to achieve the goal of reducing traffic-related fatalities and injuries. One such tool is Automated Speed Enforcement technology. When Automated Speed Enforcement works well, it encourages drivers to be conscious of their speed. At the same time a driver must have the right to due process when appealing a ticket.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 758 more characters as filed
The appeal process must be efficient and easy to navigate. However, many barriers can be faced during the process of appealing an Automated Speed Enforcement ticket. Residents have reported numerous issues: the website does not recognize their ticket number; tickets were sent out with outdated email addresses, the unstable phone line repeatedly dropped calls after 2 hours on hold. This is an overall lack of communication on the status of the ticket once the appeal form was submitted. This collection of experienced failures of the appeals process for Automated Speed Enforcement tickets undermines the legitimacy of the entire program. Therefore, I am requesting a full and thorough review of the appeals process for Automated Speed Enforcement tickets.
Staff recommended
Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Anthony Perruzza, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Director, Court Services, in consultation with relevant City agencies, to conduct a thorough review of the appeals process for disputing Automated Speed Enforcement tickets, to ensure the process is straightforward, fair, and simple to navigate. 2. City Council direct the Director, Court Services to report
Show the rest of Staff recommended, 154 more characters as filed
back to the October 29, 2025, meeting of the Infrastructure and Environment Committee with the findings of the review and recommendations for improvement.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Introduction of General Bills and Confirming BillsFiled record
- External Compliance Audit Reports for the Integrity Commissioner, Lobbyist Registrar and Ombudsman Offices for the Year Ended December 31, 2024Filed record
- 579 Glencairn Avenue - Appeal of Toronto Local Appeal Body DecisionFiled record
- Parks and Recreation Funding AllocationFiled record
- Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds from the Development at 1 Bloor Street West to St. Clare’s MultiFaith Housing to enhance accessibility and add recording space to the new performance centre at 877 Yonge Street - by Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Josh MatlowFiled record
- Call to OrderFiled record