The filed record
Selection of Candidates for the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2025-01-23 · Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal · amended
As filed
The Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal: 1. Selected the following candidates for interview at its next meeting for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal: Candidate DDR1-174 Candidate DDR1-216 Candidate DDR1-217 Candidate DDR1-218 Candidate DDR1-227 Candidate DDR1-230 2. Directed that Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (January 14, 2025) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their
Show the rest of As filed, 145 more characters as filed
entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
The Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal must select candidates to interview at its next meeting for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal. Following the interviews, the Nominating Panel will recommend one candidate to City Council for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal.
Staff recommended
The City Clerk recommends that: 1. The Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal select 5 candidates listed in Confidential Attachment 1 for interview at its next meeting for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal. 2. The Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 remain confidential in its entirety as it relates
Show the rest of Staff recommended, 121 more characters as filed
to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal.