Review of the Global Equity Mandates - Revisiting the Implementation Rationale

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

As the city filed it

The purpose of this report is to provide the Toronto Investment Board (Board) with a review of the global equity mandates and explain the rationale underlying the selection of investment managers for this asset class. A presentation by the investment consultant (Aon) provides background and decision making of the Board in 2018 and in 2024. More recently, the Board has questioned the need for "Active" global equity managers versus a broad approach on having "Passive only" mandates given the performance of active managers against their benchmarks.

Show the rest of As the city filed it, 404 more characters as filed

The investment consultant (Aon) has provided an update to their presentation from 2024 that provides a rationale for having a "balanced" approach to this decision (Attachment 1). In addition, Aon has provided a research paper entitled "Passively Becoming Active" (Attachment 2) which provides a statistical information on recent performance of passive and active investment managers and their benchmarks.

Staff recommended

The Director, Capital Markets recommends that: 1. Toronto Investment Board receive this report for information.

Review of the Global Equity Mandates - Revisiting the Implementation Rationale

The decision

As filed

On the agenda

As the city filed it

Staff recommended

On the record

More from this meeting