Toronto updates contaminated-land policy to align with Ontario rules, keeps stricter environmental standards
Toronto is amending its policy for accepting potentially contaminated lands conveyed by developers under the Planning Act to comply with recent Ontario regulatory changes that stripped municipalities of the right to request site-condition records for low-risk greenfield sites. The city is maintaining stricter environmental standards than the province allows in specific cases to protect residents and avoid operational risk, after rejecting some industry requests to relax mitigation requirements.
Who did what
- Councillor Dianne Saxe (Ward 11) movedMoved to adopt staff's revised wording clarifying exempted areas for investigation to improve policy language and ensure the city says what it means without unnecessary scope.
From the floor
“I have been working intensively with staff over the last little while to tighten up the language in this policy to make sure that we actually say what we mean and no more than what we mean.”Councillor Dianne Saxe (Ward 11)
“The primary change with regards to provincial regulations is that back in October the province made amendments to Ontario regulation 15304, and in that change what they did is they took away a municipality's right to request records of site condition for development lands that do not pose any risk to the municipality for conveyances.”City staff
“Some of those the city does not accept even though the ministry accepts them and the industry was pushing for the city to align ourselves more with what the ministry accepts, but that would put undue risk and cost on the city if we adopted those measures.”City staff
Also in this item
• Ontario stripped municipalities of the right to request site-condition records for greenfield sites, effective October 2025, narrowing Toronto's environmental oversight on low-risk land transfers under development agreements.
The journey
You can still act
On the Toronto City Council agenda for 2026-07-29
Decision
Amended policy approved by committee; staff's revised language clarifying exempted areas (e.g., near subway tunnels versus bus shelters) was adopted following Councillor Saxs's motion.
Watch it happen
Jump to this item in the meeting video
Why is this story here?
Stories are ordered by how much weight a decision carries and how directly it reaches daily life. They rise as a decision date approaches and fall as they age.