The filed record
Selection of Candidates for Interview for the Administrative Penalty Tribunal
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2026-03-13 · Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal · amended
As filed
The Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal: 1. Selected the following candidates for interview at its next meeting for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal: APT2-394 APT2-400 APT2-413 APT2-449 APT2-454 APT2-456 APT2-458 APT2-467 APT2-475 APT2-478 APT2-499 APT2-500 APT2-510 APT2-511 APT2-520 APT2-533 APT2-537 APT2-538 APT2-544 APT2-551 APT2-554 APT2-558 APT2-559 APT2-561 APT2-567 APT2-568 2. Directed
Show the rest of As filed, 270 more characters as filed
that Confidential Attachments 1a, 1b, and 2 to the report (March 4, 2026) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
The Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty must select candidates to interview for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal. Following the interviews, the Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal will recommend 13 candidates, including a Chair, to City Council, for appointment.
Staff recommended
The City Clerk recommends that: 1. The Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal select 26 candidates listed in Confidential Attachment 1a for interview at its next meeting for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal. 2. The Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal direct that Confidential Attachments 1a, 1b, and 2 remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal.