The filed record
Mid-Rise Housing Implementation Initiative - Proposals Report
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2026-05-07 · Planning and Housing Committee · amended
As filed
The Planning and Housing Committee: 1. Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to undertake public and stakeholder consultation on the proposed directions outlined in the report (April 22, 2026) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as amended below, and report back with any recommended Official Plan Amendments, Zoning By-law Amendments, or other implementing actions no later than the second quarter of 2027: a.
Show the rest of As filed, 164 more characters as filed
prioritize public and stakeholder consultation on options for managing and collecting waste, recyclable materials and organics that do not require curbside staging.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
This report provides an update on the work advancing under the Mid-Rise Housing Implementation Initiative (the "Initiative") in response to PH23.6 Missing Middle and Midrise Housing Implementation Initiative , adopted by City Council on July 23, 2025. Enabling new mid-rise housing is a key component of the City's overall housing strategy and the goal of creating a more diverse housing supply. Over the past 2 to 3 years, the City has advanced a number of policy and zoning initiatives, that now permit mid-rise housing in many more locations across the city.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 3,046 more characters as filed
The focus of the Mid-Rise Housing Implementation Initiative is to support that policy work by addressing barriers and challenges that impact the viability of delivering new mid-rise housing. For the purposes of this Initiative, mid-rise residential buildings are defined as all buildings 5- to 14-storeys in height. Mid-rise buildings help fill the gap in housing options between single-family homes/ low-rise buildings and high-rise buildings, with their size and form varying across contexts within in the city. They can range from smaller buildings up to 6-storeys within Neighbourhoods, to larger and taller 10- to 14-storey projects along Avenues. As highlighted in PH23.6, there are several challenges which can make it difficult to implement the City's updated land use policies and regulations which are intended to expand opportunities for mid‑rise housing. These challenges include unpredictable construction costs, high land and borrowing costs, and broader economic uncertainty intensified by global tariffs and trade disruptions. While many of these factors lie beyond the authority of the City, the work and proposed actions described in this report reflect a coordinated, inter-divisional effort by City staff to assess opportunities to improve the feasibility and delivery of missing‑middle and mid‑rise projects, unlocking more housing supply and creating greater choice for residents. Specifically, City Council directed staff to analyze requirements for indoor and outdoor amenity space, loading and garbage collection (particularly Type G loading space), and bicycle parking. This work was supported by: - a financial feasibility analysis, completed by Parcel Economics Inc.; - professional advice and industry engagement, led by Batory Planning + Management; - engagement with residents living in mid-rises through a targeted survey, led by City Planning; - Bicycle parking utilization count for mid-rise buildings, undertaken by BA Group; - Design test fit scenarios, led by City Planning; - Policy research, led by City Planning; and, - Research on mid-rise buildings in Berlin, Oslo, Vancouver, Paris, Stockholm, and New York City, led by post-secondary students. Pending Committee's direction, City staff will advance and consult on the proposed actions outlined in this report. Additional actions may be incorporated as further analysis is completed. Final recommendations will be presented to City Council for consideration and approval no later than the second quarter of 2027. While the actions identified in this report are intended to help enable a wider range of housing options, as prioritized by the Official Plan, mid‑rise construction may continue to face challenges due to a range of factors. Many housing developments, including missing middle and mid-rise projects, are often at the margin of feasibility, though incremental improvements can support the successful delivery of more projects, which is crucial at a time where there has been a significant decrease in project launches.
Staff recommended
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning recommends that: 1. The Planning and Housing Committee request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to undertake public and stakeholder consultation on the proposed directions outlined in this report as part of the Mid-Rise Housing Implementation Initiative and report back with any recommended Official Plan Amendments, Zoning By-law Amendments, or other implementing actions no later than the second quarter of 2027.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Ookwemin Minising - City-Initiated Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment, and Precinct Plan Update - Decision Report - ApprovalFiled record
- Toronto Builds: 970 Kipling Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - ApprovalFiled record
- 3838 Bloor Street West - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - ApprovalFiled record
- 65-87 Heward Avenue - Official Plan Amendment Application - Appeal ReportFiled record
- 65 Heward Avenue - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage ActFiled record
- Building Toronto's Housing Future - Housing Development Office 2026 Annual Toronto Builds Update and Three-Year Work PlanFiled record