Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal
The full agenda, as filed
All 2 items in the clerk’s order. Each carries the city’s own words: the staff recommendation, what the body decided, and its status. Nothing below is written by us.
DG4.1amended
Process Review of Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal Hearings
The members of the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal will discuss their experiences with the Panel hearings and provide feedback to the Chair and City Officials.
The Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal: 1. Requested the Chair to summarize comments/suggestions received from Tribunal members in his annual report, with a draft to be circulated to members prior to submission to the Economic and Community Development Committee.
DG4.2amended
Proposal to Change the Size of the Dangerous Dog Review Panel
The Rules of Procedure adopted by the Tribunal state that a Panel is 3 members and a quorum is 3 members The Tribunal may amend this. I believe the Panel should amend this to have each Panel consist of at least 4 members.
The Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal: 1. Requested the Tribunal Chair, in 2019 and 2020, to rotate the panel chair for each hearing of the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal.