Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal

The full agenda, as filed

All 4 items in the clerk’s order. Each carries the city’s own words: the staff recommendation, what the body decided, and its status. Nothing below is written by us.

• DG6.1rescinded

  Sarah Soobram - Appeal DDRT2019-13

  Appeal of Dangerous Dog Order issued February 9, 2019, Appeal DDRT2019-13

  The Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal: 1. Rescinded the determination of a dangerous dog, exempted the applicant from compliance with the Dangerous Dog Order issued February 9, 2019, and directed that the Tribunal forward the reasons for this decision to Sarah Soobram and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on or before October 2, 2019.

• DG6.2confirmed

  Frances Solomon - Appeal DDRT2019-14

  Appeal of Dangerous Dog Order issued May 18, 2019, Appeal DDRT-2019-14

  The Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal: 1. Confirmed the determination of a dangerous dog, that the conditions of the order remain in effect, and that the Tribunal forward the reasons for this decision to Frances Solomon and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on or before October 2, 2019.

• DG6.3confirmed

  Fara Haron - Appeal DDRT2019-15

  Appeal of Dangerous Dog Order issued June 2, 2019, Appeal DDRT2019-15

  The Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal: 1. Confirmed the determination of a dangerous dog, that the conditions of the order remain in effect, and that the Tribunal forward the reasons for this decision to Fara Haron and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on or before October 2, 2019.

• DG6.4confirmed

  Klaudia Jakuszyk - Appeal DDRT2019-16

  Appeal of Dangerous Dog Order issued June 9, 2019, Appeal DDRT2019-16

  The Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal: 1. Confirmed the determination of a dangerous dog, that the conditions of the order remain in effect, and that the Tribunal forward the reasons for this decision to Klaudia Jakuszyk and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on or before October 2, 2019.