Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal
The full agenda, as filed
All 3 items in the clerk’s order. Each carries the city’s own words: the staff recommendation, what the body decided, and its status. Nothing below is written by us.
DG9.1rescinded
Annie Rosen - Appeal DDRT2020-01
Appeal of Dangerous Dog Order issued, July 24, 2019, Appeal DDRT2020-01
The Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal: 1. Rescinded the determination of a dangerous dog and exempted the applicant from compliance with the Dangerous Dog Order issued July 24, 2019, and directed that the Tribunal forward the reasons for this decision to Annie Rosen and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on or before January 29, 2020.
DG9.2confirmed
Jan and Mike Wood Daly - Appeal DDRT2020-02
Appeal of Dangerous Dog Order issued August 3, 2019 - Appeal DDRT2020-02
The Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal: 1. Confirmed the determination of a dangerous dog, that the conditions of the order remain in effect, and directed that the Tribunal forward the reasons for this decision to Jan and Mike Wood Daly and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on or before January 29, 2020.
DG9.3confirmed
Michelle Flax - Appeal DDRT2020-03
Appeal of Dangerous Dog Order issued on September 28, 2019, Appeal DDRT2020-03
The Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal: 1. Confirmed the determination of a dangerous dog, that the conditions of the order remain in effect, and directed that the Tribunal forward the reasons for this decision to Michelle Flax and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on or before January 29, 2020.