Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal

The full agenda, as filed

All 1 items in the clerk’s order. Each carries the city’s own words: the staff recommendation, what the body decided, and its status. Nothing below is written by us.

• ND2.1amended

  Appointment of Public Members to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal

  The Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal will conduct interviews and recommend five candidates, including one candidate as the Chair, to City Council for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal.

  The Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal recommends that: 1. City Council appoint the following candidate to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal, who will serve as Chair for a term of office ending on November 14, 2022, and until a successor is appointed: - Rick Ross 2. City Council appoint the following candidates to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal, who will serve as public members for a term of office ending on November 14, 2022, and until successors are appointed: - Alisa Chaplick - Hayley Glaholt - Tracey Hamilton - Randy Yuen 3. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1, 2, and 3 to the report (March 29, 2019) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal.

  Staff recommendation as filed

  The City Clerk recommends that: 1. The Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal recommend that City Council appoint five candidates for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal: a. one candidate, who will serve as Chair, for a term of office ending on November 14, 2022, and until a successor is appointed; and b. four candidates, who will serve as public members, for a term of office ending on November 14, 2022, and until successors are appointed. 2. The Nominating Panel - Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 - 3 remain confidential in its entirety as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Dangerous Dog Review Tribunal.