North York Community Council
The full agenda, as filed
All 19 items in the clerk’s order. Each carries the city’s own words: the staff recommendation, what the body decided, and its status. Nothing below is written by us.
NY27.1adopted
Economic Development and Culture Initiatives in North York
Staff from the Economic Development and Culture Division will deliver a presentation on initiatives supporting business and culture in North York.
North York Community Council received the presentation from the Director, Arts and Culture Services, Economic Development and Culture and the Director, Business Growth Services, Economic Development and Culture for information.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Pasternak recommends that North York Community Council: 1. Receive this presentation for information.
NY27.2adopted
Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 151 Billy Bishop Way
This application proposes to develop the site with a car dealership in a 3-storey building, at 151 Billy Bishop Way, with 120 parking spaces; 64 at-grade and 56 in a one-level underground garage. The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020) and with the City of Toronto Official Plan. This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. The proposed development allows for the introduction of a commercial use that will attract economic growth and diversity to sustain an emerging and vibrant community.
North York Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, for the lands at 151 Billy Bishop Way substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment in Attachment 5 to the report (September 23, 2021) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013, as amended, for the lands at 151 Billy Bishop Way substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to this report. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
NY27.3adopted
Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 1, 3 and 5 Kenton Drive
This application proposes an addition to the existing 4-storey, 44 bed residential care home (Alzheimer and dementia care) at the southeast corner of Bathurst Street and Kenton Drive, and would add 29 beds for a total of 73 bed-sitting rooms. The construction of the 4-storey addition would be at the east end of the existing building and would then step down from 4-storeys to 2-storeys at the east portion of the property along Kenton Drive. The proposal includes an expansion from 12 to 15 surface parking spaces located at the south side of the property while maintaining the existing driveway access directly from Bathurst Street. The total gross floor area of the development is 3,459 square metres resulting in an overall floor space index (FSI) of 1.61 times the lot area. The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020) and the Official Plan. The proposal represents an appropriate infill development that expands housing choices on a major street with access to public transit. This report reviews and recommends approval of the application as the proposal represents good planning. The proposed expansion represents a compatible land use within Neighbourhoods and the proposed built form provides appropriate transitions to the adjacent low-rise residential neighbourhood.
North York Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council amend former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625, as amended, for the lands at 1, 3 and 5 Kenton Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment in Attachment 6 to the report (September 21, 2021) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District. 2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, for the lands at 1, 3 and 5 Kenton Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment in Attachment 7 to the report (September 21, 2021) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Council amend former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625, as amended, for the lands at 1, 3 and 5 Kenton Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to this report. 2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, for the lands at 1, 3 and 5 Kenton Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to this report. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.
NY27.4adopted
On August 17, 2020, a complete application to amend the Zoning By-laws and a Site Plan Control application were submitted to permit an 8-storey residential building at 126 to 132 Laird Drive. On May 27, 2021, the applicant appealed both the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control applications to the Ontario Land Tribunal ("OLT") due to Council not making a decision within the 90-day and 30-day time frame in the Planning Act. The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020), however do not conform with a number of policies of the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020). The proposal does not conform to the City's Official Plan, in particular the Mixed Use Areas designation, Public Realm, and Built Form policies, as well as the Laird in Focus Plan and OPA 450. Further, the proposed development does not adequately address the City's Laird in Focus Urban Design Guidelines. This report recommends that City Council instruct the City Solicitor with the appropriate City staff to attend the OLT hearing and oppose the applications in their current form and to continue discussions with the Applicant to resolve outstanding issues.
North York Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current Applications regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control appeals for the lands at 126 to 132 Laird Drive. 2. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the issuance of any final Orders be withheld until such time as the City Solicitor advises that: a. the final form and content of the draft Zoning By-laws are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner Executive Director, City Planning; b. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Engineering and Construction Services as they relate to the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control applications as set out in their memo dated June 14, 2021 or as may be updated in response to further submission(s) filed by the owner, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; c. the owner has provided a revised Functional Servicing Report, Stormwater Management Report, Municipal Servicing and Grading Plan, and any other reports or documents deemed necessary in support of the development to the City for review and acceptance by and to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; such reports will determine whether the municipal water, sanitary and storm sewer systems can support the proposed development and whether upgrade or improvements of the existing municipal infrastructure are required; d. the owner has entered into a financially secured agreement to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services for the construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure, at the owner's sole expense, should it be determined that upgrades are required to support the development as identified in the accepted Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Reports or other reports accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; e. the owner has entered into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure appropriate services, facilities, and/or matters, as may be required by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, and such agreement shall be registered on title to the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor; or made other satisfactory arrangements to secure appropriate community benefits to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor; f. the owner has withdrawn its appeal of Official Plan Amendment 450, being the Laird in Focus Area Site Specific Policy, and the associated Zoning By-law 628-2020, as relates to the subject lands; and g. the owner has submitted a complete resubmission of the application to be circulated to relevant divisions and agencies and all revisions and identified pre-approval conditions through the circulation process have been met for the Site Plan Control application, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to continue discussions with the applicant to address the issues outlined in this report. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current Applications regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control appeals for the lands at 126 to 132 Laird Drive. 2. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the issuance of any final Orders be withheld until such time as the City Solicitor advises that: a. the final form and content of the draft Zoning By-laws are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner Executive Director, City Planning; b. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Engineering and Construction Services as they relate to the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control applications as set out in their memo dated June 14, 2021 or as may be updated in response to further submission(s) filed by the owner, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; c. the owner has provided a revised Functional Servicing Report, Stormwater Management Report, Municipal Servicing and Grading Plan, and any other reports or documents deemed necessary in support of the development to the City for review and acceptance by and to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; the reports will determine whether the municipal water, sanitary and storm sewer systems can support the proposed development and whether upgrade or improvements of the existing municipal infrastructure are required; d. the owner has entered into a financially secured agreement to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services for the construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure, at the owner's sole expense, should it be determined that upgrades are required to support the development as identified in the accepted Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Reports or other reports accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; e. the owner has entered into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure appropriate services, facilities, and/or matters, as may be required by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, and such agreement shall be registered on title to the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor; or made other satisfactory arrangements to secure appropriate community benefits to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor; f. the owner has withdrawn its appeal of Official Plan Amendment 450, being the Laird in Focus Area Site Specific Policy, and the associated Zoning By-law 628-2020, as relates to the subject lands; and g. the owner has submitted a complete resubmission of the application to be circulated to relevant divisions and agencies and all revisions and identified pre-approval conditions through the circulation process have been met for the Site Plan Control application, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to continue discussions with the applicant to address the issues outlined in this report. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
NY27.5adopted
On August 17, 2020, a complete application to amend the Zoning By-laws and a Site Plan Control application were submitted to permit an 8-storey residential building at 134 Laird Drive. On June 2, 2021, the applicant appealed both the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control applications to the Ontario Land Tribunal ("OLT") due to Council not making a decision within the 90-day and 30-day time frame in the Planning Act. The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020), however does not conform with a number of policies of the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020). The proposal does not conform to the City's Official Plan, in particular the Mixed Use Areas designation, Public Realm, and Built Form policies, as well as the Laird in Focus Plan and OPA 450. Further, the proposed development does not adequately address the City's Laird in Focus Urban Design Guidelines. This report recommends that City Council instruct the City Solicitor with the appropriate City staff to attend the OLT hearing and oppose the applications in their current form and to continue discussions with the Applicant to resolve outstanding issues.
North York Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current applications regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control appeals for the lands at 134 Laird Drive. 2. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the issuance of any final Orders be withheld until such time as the City Solicitor advises that: a. the final form and content of the draft Zoning By-laws are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner Executive Director, City Planning; b. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Engineering and Construction Services as they relate to the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control applications as set out in their memo dated June 14, 2021 or as may be updated in response to further submission(s) filed by the owner, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; c. the owner has provided a revised Functional Servicing Report, Stormwater Management Report, Municipal Servicing and Grading Plan, and any other reports or documents deemed necessary in support of the development to the City for review and acceptance by and to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; the reports will determine whether the municipal water, sanitary and storm sewer systems can support the proposed development and whether upgrades or improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure are required; d. the owner has entered into a financially secured agreement to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services for the construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure, at the owner's sole expense, should it be determined that upgrades are required to support the development as identified in the accepted Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Reports or other reports accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; e. the owner has withdrawn its appeal of Official Plan Amendment 450, being the Laird in Focus Area Site Specific Policy, and the associated Zoning By-law 628-2020, as it relates to the subject lands; and f. the owner has submitted a complete resubmission of the application to be circulated to relevant divisions and agencies and all revisions and identified pre-approval conditions through the circulation process have been met for the Site Plan Control application, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to continue discussions with the applicant to address the issues outlined in this report. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current applications regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control appeals for the lands at 134 Laird Drive. 2. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the issuance of any final Orders be withheld until such time as the City Solicitor advises that: a. the final form and content of the draft Zoning By-laws are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner Executive Director, City Planning; b. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Engineering and Construction Services as they relate to the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control applications as set out in their memo dated June 14, 2021 or as may be updated in response to further submission(s) filed by the owner, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; c. the owner has provided a revised Functional Servicing Report, Stormwater Management Report, Municipal Servicing and Grading Plan, and any other reports or documents deemed necessary in support of the development to the City for review and acceptance by and to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; the reports will determine whether the municipal water, sanitary and storm sewer systems can support the proposed development and whether upgrades or improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure are required; d. the owner has entered into a financially secured agreement to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services for the construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure, at the owner's sole expense, should it be determined that upgrades are required to support the development as identified in the accepted Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Reports or other reports accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; e. the owner has withdrawn its appeal of Official Plan Amendment 450, being the Laird in Focus Area Site Specific Policy, and the associated Zoning By-law 628-2020, as it relates to the subject lands; and f. the owner has submitted a complete resubmission of the application to be circulated to relevant divisions and agencies and all revisions and identified pre-approval conditions through the circulation process have been met for the Site Plan Control application, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to continue discussions with the applicant to address the issues outlined in this report. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
NY27.6adopted
On November 3, 2020, an application to amend Zoning By-laws 438-86 and 569-2013 was submitted to permit a 12-storey mixed-use building at 3180, 3182, 3184, 3186, 3188, 3190, 3192, 3194, 3196, 3198, 3200 and 3202 Yonge Street. The proposal included 109 residential units with an overall gross floor area of 12,554.3 square metres. The applicant appealed their Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) on June 4, 2021 citing Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time frame prescribed under the Planning Act. A Case Management Conference has not yet been scheduled. The proposed development is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and does not conform with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020). The proposal does not conform to the Official Plan, in particular the policies for Avenues, Mixed Use Areas, Public Realm and Built Form. Further, the proposed development does not meet the intent of the performance standards of the Avenues & Mid-Rise Buildings Study and Addendum. This report reviews and recommends that City Council instruct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) to oppose the application in its current form and to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve outstanding issues raised in this report.
North York Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with appropriate staff, to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal to oppose the Zoning By-law Amendment application (File 20 214204 NNY 08 OZ) in its current form for the lands at 3180, 3181, 3184, 3186, 3188, 3190, 3192, 3194, 3196, 3198, 3200 and 3202 Yonge Street. 2. In the event the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold the issuance of any Order(s) on the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal for the subject lands until such time as the Ontario Land Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that: a. the final form and content of the Zoning By-law Amendments are satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; b. the Owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Engineering and Construction Services as they relate to the Zoning By-law Amendment application as set out in their memo dated July 5, 2021, or as may be updated, in response to further submissions filed by the owner, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; c. the Owner has provided a revised Functional Servicing Report, Stormwater Management Report, Hydrogeological Report, Groundwater Report, Municipal Servicing Report and Grading Plan, and any other reports necessary in support of the development to the City to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services to ensure the municipal water, sanitary and storm sewer systems can support the proposed development and to identify any required upgrades or improvements to existing municipal infrastructure; d. the Owner has entered into an agreement(s) with the City requiring the Owner, prior to the issuance of any above grade building permit, and at no cost to the City, to design, financially secure, construct and make operational, any upgrades or required improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Functional Servicing Report, Groundwater Report, Stormwater Management Report, and Hydrogeological Report to support the development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; e. the Owner has submitted a tenant relocation and assistance plan, and if required, rental replacement plan, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, and City Council, or the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning where authorized to do so, has approved the Rental Housing Demolition Application, and the Owner has entered into, and registered on title to the lands, one or more agreements with the City, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, securing all rental housing-related matters necessary to implement City Council's decision; and f. community benefits and other matters in support of the development have been secured in a Section 37 Agreement executed by the owner and registered on title to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Ward Councillor. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to continue discussions with the applicant and resolve the issues outlined in this report. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with appropriate staff, to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) to oppose the Zoning By-law Amendment application (File No. 20 214204 NNY 08 OZ) in its current form for the lands at 3180, 3182, 3184, 3186, 3188, 3190, 3192, 3194, 3196, 3198, 3200 and 3202 Yonge Street. 2. In the event the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) to withhold the issuance of any Order(s) on the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal for the subject lands until such time as the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) has been advised by the City Solicitor that: a. the final form and content of the Zoning By-law Amendments are satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; b. the Owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Engineering and Construction Services as they relate to the Zoning By-law Amendment application as set out in their memo dated July 5, 2021, or as may be updated, in response to further submissions filed by the owner, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; c. the Owner has provided a revised Functional Servicing Report, Stormwater Management Report, Hydrogeological Report, Groundwater Report, Municipal Servicing Report and Grading Plan, and any other reports necessary in support of the development to the City to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services to ensure the municipal water, sanitary and storm sewer systems can support the proposed development and to identify any required upgrades or improvements to existing municipal infrastructure; d. the Owner has entered into an agreement(s) with the City requiring the Owner, prior to the issuance of any above grade building permit, and at no cost to the City, to design, financially secure, construct and make operational, any upgrades or required improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Functional Servicing Report, Groundwater Report, Stormwater Management Report, and Hydrogeological Report to support the development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; e. the Owner has submitted a tenant relocation and assistance plan, and if required, rental replacement plan, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, and City Council, or the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning where authorized to do so, has approved the Rental Housing Demolition Application, and the Owner has entered into, and registered on title to the lands, one or more agreements with the City, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, securing all rental housing-related matters necessary to implement City Council's decision; and f. community benefits and other matters in support of the development have been secured in a Section 37 Agreement executed by the owner and registered on title to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Ward Councillor. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to continue discussions with the applicant and resolve the issues outlined in this report. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
NY27.7adopted
Refusal Report - Zoning By-Law Amendment Application - 537, 539, 541 and 543 Eglinton Avenue East
This application proposes to amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law Nos. 438-86 and 569-2013 for the lands at 537, 539, 541 and 543 Eglinton Avenue East to permit a 23-storey (72.6 metre) high residential building with a 7-storey base building that measures 23.1 metres in height. The proposal contains a total of 128 dwelling units and a total gross floor area of 9,073 square metres, resulting in a density of 16.58 times the lot area. A total of 37 vehicular parking spaces are proposed in two levels of underground parking. The proposed development represents overdevelopment of the site and is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020), does not conform with the A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020), and does not conform to the City's Official Plan and the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan. This report reviews and recommends refusal of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. The subject site is not an appropriate location for the development of a tall building. The proposal does not conform to the Official Plan and Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan policies and the Tall Building Guidelines. The proposed development cannot achieve appropriate tower setbacks nor stepbacks; does not maintain adequate access to sunlight on the public realm; lacks sufficient open space and landscaping on site; is not providing pet amenity area; and proposes a 7-storey base building height that does not conform to the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan. The proposed tower fails to fit within its existing and planned context. The proposed tower at 23-storeys significantly exceeds the anticipated 8 to 12 storey height range for the Eglinton East Character Area and is unacceptable. A virtual community consultation meeting has been scheduled for October 18, 2021. A supplementary report will be sent to City Council reporting on the outcome of the community consultation meeting prior to Council consideration of this application. Therefore, for the reasons outlined in this report, it is recommended that the application be refused and in the event that the matter is appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal, that the City Solicitor and appropriate staff oppose the appeal.
North York Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council refuse the application for Zoning By-law Amendment for the lands at 537, 539, 541 and 543 Eglinton Avenue East for the reasons outlined in the report (September 23, 2021) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with appropriate staff, to appear before the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of City Council's decision to refuse the application, in the event that the application is appealed. 3. In the event that the refusal is appealed and the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Tribunal withhold its Order until such time as the Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that: a. the form and content of the Zoning By-law Amendments are satisfactory to the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District and City Solicitor; b. the owner has addressed any issues arising from the technical review of the July 29, 2021 submission identified as part of Engineering and Construction Services review of the file, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Transportation Services; c. the Owner has provided any outstanding materials, including, but not limited to: a satisfactory Geotechnical Study, Hydrogeological Report, Transportation Impact Study and Functional Servicing Reports, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Transportation Services; and d. the owner has submitted a revised Travel Demand Management Plan acceptable to, and to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Transportation Services and that such matters arising from such study be secured if required. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to take such necessary steps, as required, to implement City Council's decision.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Council refuse the application for Zoning By-law Amendment for the lands at 537, 539, 541 and 543 Eglinton Avenue East for the reasons outlined in the report dated September 23, 2021 from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with appropriate staff, to appear before the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) in support of City Council's decision to refuse the application, in the event that the application is appealed. 3. In the event that the refusal is appealed and the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Tribunal withhold its Order until such time as the Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that: a. the form and content of the Zoning By-law Amendments are satisfactory to the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District and City Solicitor; b. the owner has addressed any issues arising from the technical review of the July 29, 2021 submission identified as part of Engineering and Construction Services review of the file, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Transportation Services; c. the Owner has provided any outstanding materials, including, but not limited to: a satisfactory Geotechnical Study, Hydrogeological Report, Transportation Impact Study and Functional Servicing Reports, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Transportation Services; and d. the owner has submitted a revised Travel Demand Management Plan acceptable to, and to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Transportation Services and that such matters arising from such study be secured if required. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to take such necessary steps, as required, to implement the foregoing.
NY27.8adopted
Final Report - Part Lot Control Exemption Application - 1202 to 1204 Avenue Road
The Part Lot Control Exemption Application proposes to permit the creation of seven conveyable lots for the residential townhouses (related Site Plan Application No.: 16 254041 NNY 16 SA) at 1202 to 1204 Avenue Road. Each townhouse is to have a rear integrated garage that is accessed from a private common-element condominium road. The applicant submitted a concurrent application for approval of a draft plan of Common Elements Condominium (21 171485 NNY 08 CD) that is currently under review by the Staff pursuant to the delegated approval under Bylaw 229-2000, which proposes to establish the walkway, private driveway, and a servicing meter room as common elements of the condominium. The requested exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act is required to permit the creation of seven conveyable lots for residential townhouses currently under construction, which will become the Parcels of Tied Land ("POTL") to the Common Elements Condominium. The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020), conforms with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020) and conforms to the Official Plan. The lifting of Part Lot Control is appropriate for the orderly development of these lands. This report reviews and recommends approval of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law. In addition, this report recommends that the owner of the lands be required to register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act against the subject lands, whereby the owner agrees not to convey or mortgage any part of the lands without prior consent of the Chief Planner or his designate.
North York Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 1202 to 1204 Avenue Road as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (September 7, 2021) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council. 2. Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill, City Council require the owner to: a. provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor; and b. register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the subject lands described in Schedule "A" in Attachment 5 to the report (September 7, 2021), from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District, without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or designate. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from all or any portion of the lands in the City Solicitor's sole discretion after consulting with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning at such a time as confirmation is received that the Common Elements Condominium has been registered. 4. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title. 5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 1202 to 1204 Avenue Road as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to this report, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council. 2. Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill, City Council require the owner to: a. provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor; and b. register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the subject lands described in Schedule "A" in Attachment 5 to this report, without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or his/her designate. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from all or any portion of the lands in the City Solicitor's sole discretion after consulting with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning at such a time as confirmation is received that the Common Elements Condominium has been registered. 4. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title. 5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.
NY27.9adopted
Preliminary Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 47 Ranleigh Avenue
This report provides information and identifies a preliminary set of issues regarding the application located at 47 Ranleigh Avenue. The Zoning By-law Amendment application proposes to alter the existing two-storey residential building with three dwelling units by constructing additions and converting it into a four-storey apartment building with 16 dwelling units and five vehicular parking spaces at the rear. Staff are currently reviewing the application. It has been circulated to all appropriate agencies and City divisions for comment. Staff will proceed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the application with the Ward Councillor.
North York Community Council directed that: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the application located at 47 Ranleigh Avenue together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the application located at 47 Ranleigh Avenue together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
NY27.10adopted
At the September 13, 2021 meeting of North York Community Council, a Preliminary Report was considered that, amongst other matters, directed Planning Staff to undertake a Focused Area Study. A recommendation was added by the Local Ward Councillor directing staff to consider, and report back in October 2021, on extending the boundary of the Focus Area Study to include 197, 205, and 215 Wynford Drive. This report responds to that Direction.
North York Community Council received the report (September 23, 2021) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District for information.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. This report be received for information.
NY27.11adopted
Parking Amendments - Whitmore Avenue
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. Transportation Services is recommending that the existing 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, parking prohibition on the south side of Whitmore Avenue, between Dufferin Street and Jimmy Wisdom Way (formerly Locksley Avenue), be rescinded. The proposed amendment has been requested by residents and will have a negligible effect on traffic operations. During the course of the investigation, it was noted that there is a discrepancy between posted signs and the existing parking regulations. Recommendations 2 to 9 will correct these inconsistencies. There is also accessible parking that is no longer in use that will be rescinded by recommendations 10 and 11.
North York Community Council: 1. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, from the 1st day of each month to the 15th day of each month, April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the south side of Whitmore Avenue, between Dufferin Street and Locksley Avenue. 2. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:00 midnight to 6:00 a.m., all times, except no parking from 7:00 p.m. 1st day to 7:00 p.m. on the 16th day of each month, inclusive, April 1 to December 1, inclusive and no parking anytime from 7:00 p.m. December 1 of one year to 7:00 p.m. April 1 of the next following year, inclusive and no parking 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday to Friday, on the even (north) side of Whitmore Avenue, from Dufferin Street to Locksley Avenue. 3. Authorized permit parking to be in effect from 12:00 midnight to 6:00 a.m., all times, except no parking from the 1st day to the 15th day of each month from April 1 to November 30, inclusive and from December 1 of one year to March 31 of the next following year, inclusive, on the even (north) side of Whitmore Avenue, from a point 47 metres east of Dufferin Street to Jimmy Wisdom Way. 4. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:00 midnight to 6:00 a.m., all times, except no parking from 7:00 p.m. on the 16th day of each month to 7:00 p.m. on the 1st day of each month, inclusive, April 1 to December 1, inclusive and no parking from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday to Friday, on the odd (south) side of Whitmore Avenue, from Dufferin Street to Locksley Avenue. 5. Authorized permit parking to be in effect from 12:00 midnight to 6:00 a.m., all times, except no parking from the 16th day of each month to the end of the month, from April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the even (odd) south side of Whitmore Avenue, from a point 47 metres east of Dufferin Street to Jimmy Wisdom Way. 6. Prohibited parking at all times on both sides of Whitmore Avenue, between Dufferin Street and a point 47 metres east. 7. Amended the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times from the 16th day of each month to the last day of each month, April 1 to November 30, inclusive on the south side of Whitmore Avenue, between Dufferin Street and Marlee Avenue to be in effect between a point 47 metres east of Dufferin Street and Marlee Avenue. 8. Amended the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times from the 1st day of each month to the 15th day of each month, April 1 to November 30, inclusive and from December 1 to March 31, inclusive on the north side of Whitmore Avenue, between Dufferin Street and Marlee Avenue to be in effect between a point 47 metres east of Dufferin Street and Marlee Avenue. 9. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, all times, December 1 to March 31, inclusive on the south side of Whitmore Avenue, between Dufferin Street and Locksley Avenue. 10. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times from the 16th day of each month to the last day of each month, April 1 to November 30, inclusive on the north side of Whitmore Avenue, between a point 63 metres east of Dufferin Street and a point 5.5 metres further east. 11. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times from December 1 to March 31, inclusive on the south side of Whitmore Avenue, between a point 63 metres east of Dufferin Street and a point 5.5 metres further east.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services recommends that: 1. North York Community Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, from the 1st day of each month to the 15th day of each month, April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the south side of Whitmore Avenue, between Dufferin Street and Locksley Avenue. 2. North York Community Council rescind the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:00 midnight to 6:00 a.m., all times, except no parking from 7:00 p.m. 1st day to 7:00 p.m. on the 16th day of each month, inclusive, April 1 to December 1, inclusive and no parking anytime from 7:00 p.m. December 1 of one year to 7:00 p.m. April 1 of the next following year, inclusive and no parking 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday to Friday, on the even (north) side of Whitmore Avenue, from Dufferin Street to Locksley Avenue. 3. North York Community Council authorize permit parking to be in effect from 12:00 midnight to 6:00 a.m., all times, except no parking from the 1st day to the 15th day of each month from April 1 to November 30, inclusive and from December 1 of one year to March 31 of the next following year, inclusive, on the even (north) side of Whitmore Avenue, from a point 47 metres east of Dufferin Street to Jimmy Wisdom Way. 4. North York Community Council rescind the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:00 midnight to 6:00 a.m., all times, except no parking from 7:00 p.m. on the 16th day of each month to 7:00 p.m. on the 1st day of each month, inclusive, April 1 to December 1, inclusive and no parking from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday to Friday, on the odd (south) side of Whitmore Avenue, from Dufferin Street to Locksley Avenue. 5. North York Community Council authorize permit parking to be in effect from 12:00 midnight to 6:00 a.m., all times, except no parking from the 16th day of each month to the end of the month, from April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the even (odd) south side of Whitmore Avenue, from a point 47 metres east of Dufferin Street to Jimmy Wisdom Way. 6. North York Community Council prohibit parking at all times on both sides of Whitmore Avenue, between Dufferin Street and a point 47 metres east. 7. North York Community Council amend the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times from the 16th day of each month to the last day of each month, April 1 to November 30, inclusive on the south side of Whitmore Avenue, between Dufferin Street and Marlee Avenue to be in effect between a point 47 metres east of Dufferin Street and Marlee Avenue. 8. North York Community Council amend the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times from the 1st day of each month to the 15th day of each month, April 1 to November 30, inclusive and from December 1 to March 31, inclusive on the north side of Whitmore Avenue, between Dufferin Street and Marlee Avenue to be in effect between a point 47 metres east of Dufferin Street and Marlee Avenue. 9. North York Community Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, all times, December 1 to March 31, inclusive on the south side of Whitmore Avenue, between Dufferin Street and Locksley Avenue. 10. North York Community Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times from the 16th day of each month to the last day of each month, April 1 to November 30, inclusive on the north side of Whitmore Avenue, between a point 63 metres east of Dufferin Street and a point 5.5 metres further east. 11. North York Community Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times from December 1 to March 31, inclusive on the south side of Whitmore Avenue, between a point 63 metres east of Dufferin Street and a point 5.5 metres further east.
NY27.12adopted
Extension of Permit Parking Hours - Soudan Avenue
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. Transportation Services is recommending that overnight on-street permit parking hours be extended on Soudan Avenue, between Cleveland Street and Forman Avenue, from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., 7 days a week to the new hours of 12:01 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., 7 days a week. Residents requested the extension of the overnight on-street permit parking hours on Soudan Avenue to improve parking flexibility, and to allow the Parking Enforcement Unit and Toronto Police Service to effectively control long-term parking by non-residents through tagging and towing operations.
North York Community Council: 1. Authorized the extension of the overnight on-street permit parking hours on Soudan Avenue, between Cleveland Street and Forman Avenue from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., 7 days a week to 12:01 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., 7 days a week.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Director, Permits and Enforcement, Transportation Services recommends that: 1. North York Community Council authorize the extension of the overnight on-street permit parking hours on Soudan Avenue, between Cleveland Street and Forman Avenue from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., 7 days a week to 12:01 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., 7 days a week.
NY27.13referred
Ernest Avenue - Traffic Calming
My office has been working with local residents along Ernest Avenue for several years on measures to address speeding and safety issues along this street. Unfortunately, the pandemic precluded us from taking follow-up action until now. Given the return of pre-pandemic traffic levels and local construction, we have seen a marked increase in speeding through Ernest Avenue and onto surrounding streets such as Edmonton Drive, Faye Drive, Cherokee Boulevard, and Lucifer Drive. I am therefore requesting that North York Community Council approve the installation of five speed humps, generally as shown in the attached drawing.
North York Community Council referred Item NY27.13 back to the General Manager, Transportation Services for further review and to bring a report to North York Community Council.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Shelley Carroll recommends that North York Community Council: 1. Authorize the installation of traffic calming (speed humps) on Ernest Avenue, between Edmonton Drive and Victoria Park Avenue, despite poll results that did not satisfy the polling criteria for the installation of speed humps pursuant to the City's Traffic Calming Policy. 2. Direct the City Solicitor to prepare a by-law to alter sections of the roadway for the installation of six speed humps on Ernest Avenue, between Edmonton Drive and Victoria Park Avenue, generally as shown on drawing number NYRD21-0024, dated September 2021 and attached to the letter dated September 23, 2021 from Councillor Shelley Carroll. 3. Subject to approval of Recommendations 1 and 2 above, reduce the speed limit from 40 km/h to 30 km/h on Ernest Avenue, between Edmonton Drive and Victoria Park Avenue, in conjunction with the installation of speed humps.
NY27.14referred
Pineway Boulevard - Traffic Calming
My office has been working with local residents along Pineway Boulevard since before the pandemic on measures to address speeding and safety issues along this street. In 2019, we worked with 8 80 Cities on a pop-up that brought in new traffic calming measures over the course of a few days. These measures proved very popular with the local community and had a measurable impact on speeding. Unfortunately, the pandemic precluded us from taking follow-up action until now. Given the current reconstruction of Cummer Avenue, residents' concerns about a greater number of vehicles speeding in this stretch are growing. I am therefore requesting that North York Community Council approve the installation of five speed humps, generally as shown in the attached drawing.
North York Community Council referred Item NY27.14 back to the General Manager, Transportation Services for further review and to bring a report to North York Community Council.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Shelley Carroll recommends that North York Community Council: 1. Waive the polling requirement under the City's Traffic Calming Policy and authorize the installation of traffic calming (speed humps) on Pineway Boulevard, between Bernick Road and Weatherstone Crescent (north intersection). 2. Direct the City Solicitor to prepare a by-law to alter sections of the roadway for the installation of five speed humps on Pineway Boulevard, generally as shown on drawing number NYRD19-0001 dated January 2019 and attached to the letter dated September 23, 2021 from Councillor Shelley Carroll. 3. Subject to approval of Recommendations 1 and 2 above, reduce the speed limit from 40 km/h to 30 km/h on Pineway Boulevard, between Bernick Road and Weatherstone Crescent (north intersection), in conjunction with the installation of speed humps.
NY27.15adopted
Application to Remove a City-Owned Tree - 338 Belsize Drive
This report requests that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one City-owned tree located at 338 Belsize Drive. The application indicates the reason for removal is due to a conflict with the proposed construction of a new dwelling. The subject tree is a honey locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) measuring 75 cm in diameter. The Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.
North York Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one City-owned tree located at 338 Belsize Drive.
Staff recommendation as filed
The General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation recommends that: 1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one City-owned tree located at 338 Belsize Drive.
NY27.16referred
Application to Remove a Private Tree - 8 Leacock Crescent
This report requests that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 8 Leacock Crescent. The application indicates the reasons for removal are to accommodate a landscape redesign, as well as to address concerns regarding the safety of the children and the property related to potential tree failure and root damage to the driveway and garage slab. The subject tree is a silver maple (Acer saccharinum), measuring 75 cm in diameter. The Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.
North York Community Council referred the Item back to the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation for further investigation.
Staff recommendation as filed
The General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation recommends that: 1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 8 Leacock Crescent.
NY27.17adopted
Preliminary Report - 3280 Dufferin Street and 12-16 Orfus Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application
I am requesting that you add the attached Report for Action dated September 30, 2021 from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District to the October 13, 2021 meeting of the North York Community Council for adoption. A Preliminary Report was considered by the North York Community Council on September 13, 2021, and was referred back to staff with a requirement to report back once a Community Services and Facilities Study as set out under Chapter 3 of the Official Plan was submitted to and considered by the Ward Councillor (refer to Item NY 26.8). A Community Services and Facilities Study was submitted to and considered by myself, the Ward Councillor and I am satisfied.
North York Community Council directed that: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the application located at 3280 Dufferin Street and 12-16 Orfus Road together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Mike Colle recommends that North York Community Council adopt the following recommendations in the report (September 30, 2021) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the application located at 3280 Dufferin Street and 12-16 Orfus Road together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
NY27.18adopted
It is important that city-issued Building Permits be displayed on the site in a location and easily readable manner to ensure that the public is able to access the information and be assured that any residential construction requiring a Building Permit has been issued and is clearly posted. The public needs to know that the construction is being carried out in compliance with all city rules and regulations and be provided with the permit number to reference when contacting the city. There are a number of construction sites in my Ward where there is no visible Building Permit. I would like to know what the requirements for posting are, whether they are being followed up by our Inspectors to ensure compliance with positing if required, and what penalties are assessed for failure to post the permits in a publicly accessible location.
North York Community Council directed that: 1. The Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building report to the next meeting of North York Community Council on the requirements for posting building permits on residential construction sites and the penalties if any Building Permits are not displayed.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Mike Colle recommends that: 1. The Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building report to the next meeting of North York Community Council on the requirements for posting building permits on residential construction sites and what are the penalties if any Building Permits are not displayed.
NY27.19not yet heard
Introduction and consideration of Bills for enactment of By-laws.
General Bills North York Community Council enacted By‑laws 857-2021 to 861-2021. Confirmatory Bill North York Community Council passed a confirmatory Bill as By-law 856-2021.