Toronto City Council
The full agenda, as filed
All 111 items in the clerk’s order. Each carries the city’s own words: the staff recommendation, what the body decided, and its status. Nothing below is written by us.
Items 26 to 50 of 111Show 2550100all
MM39.8adopted
In 2005, $103,251.33 of Section 37 funds were earmarked for public art from the development of 35 Balmuto Street and 764 Yonge Street. After 20 years of interest, this amount has grown to only $110,605.48. It is long past time to put this money to work. The Toronto Public Library will use these funds to install public art in the Toronto Reference Library that will invite patrons to its forthcoming Centre for Democracy.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council increase the 2026-2035 Capital Budget and Plan for Toronto Public Library on a one time-basis, with an increase in project costs and cash flows of $110,605.48 gross, $0 debt in 2027, for the fabrication and installation of public art at the Toronto Reference Library, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the developments at 35 Balmuto Street and 764 Yonge Street (Source Account: XR3026-3700891), secured for public art (Cost Centre: CLB223-01).
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley, recommends that: 1. City Council increase the 2026-2035 Capital Budget and Plan for Toronto Public Library on a one time-basis, with an increase in project costs and cash flows of $110,605.48 gross, $0 debt in 2027, for the fabrication and installation of public art at the Toronto Reference Library, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the developments at 35 Balmuto Street and 764 Yonge Street (Source Account: XR3026-3700891), secured for public art (Cost Centre: CLB223-01).
CC39.9adopted
On March 29, 2023, the City received an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment application for 444 to 466 Eglinton Avenue West to permit the construction of a 19-storey (70.3-metre, inclusive of mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building containing 185 dwelling units and retail space on the ground floor. The applicant appealed City Council's neglect or failure to make a decision on the application to the Ontario Land Tribunal on July 19, 2024. At its meeting on November 13 and 14, 2024, City Council directed the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing to oppose the application, and to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve outstanding issues. On January 18, 2025, the applicant submitted revised plans to the Ontario Land Tribunal. The Revised Proposal sought to permit a 31-storey (105.6-metre, inclusive of mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building with 322 dwelling units and retail space on the ground floor, and incorporated the lands located at 468 Eglinton Avenue West given a change in ownership. Between June 17 and June 25, 2025, the Ontario Land Tribunal held a contested hearing in respect of the Revised Proposal. On July 25, 2025, the Ontario Land Tribunal dismissed the applicant's appeal of the Revised Proposal in principle and directed the City and applicant to consider a resolution aligned with the Ontario Land Tribunal's findings. The Ontario Land Tribunal also directed the parties to advise the Ontario Land Tribunal within six months of the Decision's issuance on the status of discussions and requested next steps. On January 30, 2026, the Ontario Land Tribunal ordered a Hearing Continuation focused only on height, and if necessary, step backs. On March 11, 2026, the applicant submitted further revised plans to the Ontario Land Tribunal for the purpose of the Hearing Continuation (the "Hearing Continuation Plans"). The Hearing Continuation Plans propose a building of 26 storeys that is otherwise identical, in terms of built form, to the 31-storey proposal that was adjudicated by the Ontario Land Tribunal in the contested hearing. The City Solicitor requires further directions in respect of the Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing Continuation. This matter is urgent and should not be deferred.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 11, 2026) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (March 11, 2026) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 11, 2026) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 11, 2026) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public as follows: 1. City Council accept the without prejudice offer to settle dated March 6, 2026, set out in Confidential Appendix A to the report (March 11, 2026) from the City Solicitor and direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of the settlement. 2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Order until the City Solicitor has advised that: a. the final form and content of the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment are to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; b. the owner has satisfactorily addressed the Engineering and Construction Services matters in the Engineering and Construction Services Memorandum dated August 16, 2023, or as may be updated, all to the satisfaction of the Director, Engineering Review, Development Review; c. the owner has satisfactorily addressed Transportation Services matters in the Transportation Services memo dated January 19, 2024, or as may be updated in response to further submissions filed by the owner, all to the satisfaction of the Director, Engineering Review, Development Review; d. the owner has submitted a revised Travel Demand Management Plan to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering Review, Development Review and the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the matters arising from such Plan have been secured, if required; e. the owner has submitted a revised Pedestrian Wind Study to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the matters arising from such Study have been secured, if required; f. the owner has satisfactorily addressed matters from the Urban Forestry, Tree Protection and Plan Review memorandum dated August 3, 2023, or as may be updated in response to further submissions filed by the owner, all to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry; and g. the owner has submitted an updated complete Toronto Green Standard Checklist and Statistics Template, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take all necessary and reasonable actions to implement City Council's decision. Confidential Appendix A to the report (March 11, 202) from the City Solicitor is now public and can be accessed under Background Information (City Council). The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 11, 2026) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 11, 2026) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and the entirety of Confidential Appendix A to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM39.9adopted
In 2015, $50,000 of Section 37 funds in Ward 11 were earmarked for improvements to the Huron Street Garden at 180 Huron Street, now called Lillian H. Smith Park. It is appropriate to put these funds to work by improving the Huron Street Garden/Lillian H. Smith Park, including: a. a shed to support the community garden; b. a picnic table on a concrete pad; c. three (3) new benches on concrete pads; d. a sign or plaque; and e. three (3) raised garden planters.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend the 2026-2035 Capital Budget and Plan for Parks and Recreation to create a new capital project "Huron Street Garden Improvements" with cash flow commitment of $57,263 gross and $0 debt in 2026, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits secured in Ward 11 (Source Account: XR3026-3700837) for the purpose of asset improvements at the Huron Street Garden, also known as Lillian H. Smith Park.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Lily Cheng, recommends that: 1. City Council amend the 2026-2035 Capital Budget and Plan for Parks and Recreation to create a new capital project "Huron Street Garden Improvements" with cash flow commitment of $57,263 gross and $0 debt in 2026, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits secured in Ward 11 (Source Account: XR3026-3700837) for the purpose of asset improvements at the Huron Street Garden, also known as Lillian H. Smith Park.
CC39.10amended
895 Lawrence Avenue East - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions
On July 27, 2022, an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment application was submitted to permit the development of a mixed-use building comprised of two towers atop a shared podium. The towers were proposed to be 17 and 22 storeys tall and the shared podium was proposed to be 6 storeys tall. The Original Proposal provided 438 dwelling units throughout the building and 1,513 square metres of retail space within the base building. Subsequent to the Original Proposal, the subject site was sold. On December 10, 2024, the new owners submitted revised materials for the City's consideration. The Revised Proposal proposes to redevelop the site with three residential towers at 26, 32 and 34 storeys, of which one tower (the East Tower) would provide retail space on the ground floor. A privately owned publicly accessible space is proposed at the northeast corner of the site, abutting the intersection of Lawrence Avenue East and The Donway West. On April 10, 2025, Staff submitted a report to North York Community recommending that Council refuse the Revised Proposal. On April 14, 2025, the applicant appealed their application to the Ontario Land Tribunal due to Council not making a decision within the statutorily prescribed time frame in the Planning Act. City Council adopted City Staff's recommendations with respect to the Revised Proposal on May 21 and 22, 2025.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 5, 2026) from the City Solicitor, as amended by motion 1. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 5, 2026) from the City Solicitor, as amended by motion 1, and Confidential Appendices A and B to the report (March 5, 2026) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 5, 2026) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 5, 2026) from the City Solicitor, as amended by motion 1, were adopted by City Council and are now public as follows: 1. City Council accept the without prejudice offer to settle dated March 5, 2026, set out in Confidential Appendix A and settlement drawings set out in Confidential Appendix B the report (March 5, 2026) from the City Solicitor (collectively, the "Settlement Offer") and direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of the settlement. 2. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold its Order until the City Solicitor has advised that: a. the final form and content of the draft zoning by-law amendment is to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, and the City Solicitor; b. the Owner has, at its sole cost and expense: i. submitted a revised Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, Hydrogeological Review Report, Hydrogeological Assessment Report, Servicing Report, Groundwater Summary Form, Foundation Drainage Summary Form, Hydrological Review Summary Form and Associated engineering plans (i.e., Servicing Plan, Grading Plan, Storm Tributary Plan, Sanitary Tributary Plan, Plan and Profiles) (the "Engineering Reports"), to determine the stormwater runoff, sanitary flow and water supply demand resulting from this Development, and whether there is adequate capacity in the existing municipal infrastructure to accommodate the proposed development to the satisfaction of the Director, Engineering Review; ii. ensured the implementation of the accepted Engineering Reports does not require changes to the proposed amending By-laws or any such required changes have been made to the proposed amending By-laws, to the satisfaction of the Director, Engineering Review, and the City Solicitor, including the use of a Holding ("H") By-law symbol regarding any new or upgrades to existing municipal servicing infrastructure as may be required; iii. submitted a revised Transportation Impact Study or addendum, including a Transportation Demand Management Plan to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the General Manager, Transportation Services, and that matters arising from such study, be secured if required; iv. submitted a Pedestrian Level Wind Study - Wind Tunnel Study, including the identification of any required mitigation measures to be implemented and secured through the Zoning By-law process to resolve wind safety exceedances and to improve pedestrian comfort, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review; v. submitted an Arborist Report, Tree Preservation and Inventory Plan, Soil Volume Plan (QL-A), Public Utilities Plans, Landscape Plan demonstrating sufficient soil volume for tree growth and Landscape Sections to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry; vi. updated elevation drawing or rendering of the north/front elevation (looking south) showing the proposed development and the adjacent heritage building in their entirety with reference datum lines of the adjacent listed building, as well as a revised Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; vii. made revisions to meet the Toronto Green Standard requirements to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review; and viii. provided a revised Energy Strategy Report, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry; c. if the accepted Engineering Report(s) require(s) any new municipal infrastructure or upgrades to existing municipal infrastructure to support the development, then either: i. the owner, at its sole cost and expense, has secured the design, construction, and provision of financial securities for any new municipal infrastructure, or any upgrades or required improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Engineering Report(s), to support the development, in a financially secured agreement, to the satisfaction of the Director, Engineering Review; or ii. the required new municipal infrastructure or upgrades to existing municipal infrastructure to support the development according to the accepted Engineering Report(s), have been constructed and are operational, to the satisfaction of the Director, Engineering Review, and the General Manager, Toronto Water. 3. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the local Ward Councillor and the City Solicitor, to explore with the applicant the potential of providing an onsite in-kind community benefit pursuant to section 37(6) of the Planning Act in the development, and to report back to City Council for further instruction if the applicant offers an in-kind community benefit. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take all necessary and reasonable actions to implement City Council's decision. Confidential Appendices A and B to the report (March 5, 202) from the City Solicitor are now public and can be accessed under Background Information (City Council). The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 5, 2026) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 5, 2026) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and the entirety of Confidential Appendices A and B to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM39.10adopted
School trustees have existed in Ontario since 1816 and have long played an essential role in delivering accountability, reflecting local priorities and ensuring that the students they represent are receiving the resources and education they need and deserve. This role has been central to the operation of Ontario's schools since before confederacy, enshrining democratic representation as a key principle at the heart of our public education system. In the Summer of 2025, the Government of Ontario appointed supervisors to school boards across Ontario, including the Toronto District School Board and Toronto Catholic District School Board, supplanting the role of elected trustees in Ontario's public education system. The appointment of these supervisors has raised significant concerns among parents about lost transparency and accountability, and what the loss of the truly local representation provided by trustees may mean for their children's education. Critical decisions affecting hundreds of thousands of students across the City were once made in meetings open to the public - now, these decisions are opaque and without public scrutiny. Under supervision, parents no longer have a local point of contact who is responsive to the specific needs of their students, or communities more broadly. In addition to the concerns raised above, the undermining of the role of trustees is a serious concern from a municipal governance perspective. Trustees are essential points of contact for Councillors to raise and discuss pressing local issues relating to education and school sites. Provincially appointed supervisors without local knowledge and specific experience in our communities are not a replacement for trustees. These concerns are worsened by the passing of Bill 33, which received Royal Assent in November 2025. This Bill grants the Province overriding authority over school boards - authority which they have signaled may be used to eliminate the role of trustees in Ontario's education system in part or in whole. Recent reports suggest the Province's decision on the fate of the trustee system could be shared in the very near future. As the Province considers their next steps on this issue, it is essential that robust consultation is conducted as part of the process. Parents, teachers and others in the education sector should be a part of the conversation that will influence the lives and learning of all students across Ontario. It is crucial that City Council join municipalities across Ontario in recognizing and reaffirming the importance of trustees to maintaining accountability, transparency and local representation for parents and students in the public education system.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council express its support for the role of locally-elected trustees in ensuring accountability, representing local priorities and advocating for the needs of students. 2. City Council request the Province of Ontario to first initiate a robust, province-wide consultation on school board governance models before considering any decision that would alter the governance role of trustees. 3. City Council forward this item to the Ontario Public School Boards' Association, Ontario Catholic School Trustees' Association, Rural Ontario Municipal Association and the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, as well as Members of Provincial Parliament representing ridings in the City of Toronto.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley, recommends that: 1. City Council express its support for the role of locally-elected trustees in ensuring accountability, representing local priorities and advocating for the needs of students. 2. City Council request the Province of Ontario to first initiate a robust, province-wide consultation on school board governance models before considering any decision that would alter the governance role of trustees. 3. City Council forward this item to the Ontario Public School Boards' Association, Ontario Catholic School Trustees' Association, Rural Ontario Municipal Association and the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, as well as Members of Provincial Parliament representing ridings in the City of Toronto.
CC39.11adopted
City Council designated the Kensington Market Heritage Conservation District and adopted the Kensington Market Heritage Conservation District Plan at its meeting of February 5, 2025. The Kensington Market Heritage Conservation District was subsequently appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal. The Ontario Land Tribunal has scheduled a 5-day hearing of the appeals of the Kensington Market Heritage Conservation District beginning June 1, 2026. The City Solicitor requires further direction from City Council on this litigation matter.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 10, 2026) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 10, 2026) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation. 3. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendices 1 to 3 to the report (March 10, 2026) from the City Solicitor, at the discretion of the City Solicitor. Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendices 1 to 3 to the report (March 10, 2026) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as they contain advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation. Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendices 1 to 3 to the report (March 10, 2026) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation. 3. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and the contents of Confidential Appendices 1 to 3 to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council, at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
MM39.11adopted
Despite substantial investments in police staffing and an overall reduction in major crime indicators, parts of Toronto are facing a dangerous level of armed home invasions in which organized auto thieves violently break into occupied dwellings and confront or attack those who live there to obtain vehicle keys. These violent and deeply frightening confrontations threaten the safety of Toronto families, seniors and children in their own homes. These crimes are not isolated incidents but are driven by sophisticated international organized crime networks. Stopping them requires more than local patrolling; it demands a data-driven, cross-jurisdictional strategy that utilizes modern technology to track offenders and a commitment to direct, transparent communication with the residents most affected.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council request the Toronto Police Service Board to request the Chief of Police to report to the Toronto Police Service Board as soon as practicable on the incidence of home invasions in Toronto communities and all actions being taken or that should be taken to deter, investigate, solve and report outcomes on these deeply disturbing crimes.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, recommends that: 1. City Council request the Toronto Police Service Board to request the Chief of Police to report to the Toronto Police Service Board as soon as practicable on the incidence of home invasions in Toronto communities and all actions being taken or that should be taken to deter, investigate, solve and report outcomes on these deeply disturbing crimes.
CC39.12adopted
Ookwemin Minising - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Direction
The City of Toronto, together with CreateTO and Waterfront Toronto, are advancing a significant revitalization project for the Port Lands, including Ookwemin Minising (formerly known as Villiers Island). At its meeting on June 26, 2024, City Council adopted amendments to the Official Plan (OPA 409), Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 (By-law 702-2024) and the Precinct Plan for Ookwemin Minising. These amendments advance the redevelopment, and updated the planning framework for the island in response to Toronto's Housing Action Plan, to permit a dense, inclusive, sustainable and walkable urban community. On July 29, 2024, the Toronto Port Authority appealed Official Plan Amendment 409 and By-law 702-2024 to the Ontario Land Tribunal. At its meetings on July 23 and 24, 2025, and December 16 and 17, 2025, City Council provided the City Solicitor with instructions in respect of the appeals. While no hearing dates are currently scheduled, the City Solicitor requires further instructions to bring finality to this chapter of the planning framework and advance City Council's objectives in the Port Lands. Accordingly, this matter is urgent and should not be deferred.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 10, 2026) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendices A and B to the report (March 10, 2026) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 10, 2026) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 10, 2026) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public as follows: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to execute Minutes of Settlement with the revised Maximum Parcel Governing Limits set out in Confidential Appendix A to Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 10, 2026) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any other necessary City staff to support the zoning by-law height changes set out in Confidential Appendix B to Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 10, 2026) from the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct the Board of Directors of City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation, carrying on business as Toronto Port Lands Company to authorize any actions or approvals necessary, including execution of Minutes of Settlement with the revised Maximum Parcel Governing Limits set out in Confidential Appendix A to Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 10, 2026) from the City Solicitor. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Land Tribunal make any necessary technical and stylistic changes to Official Plan Amendment 409 and Zoning By-law 702-2024, and to take all other necessary and reasonable actions to implement City Council's decision. Confidential Appendices A and B to the report (March 10, 2026) from the City Solicitor are now public and can be accessed under Background Information (City Council). The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 10, 2026) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 10, 2026) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1, along with the entirety of Confidential Appendices A and B to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM39.12adopted
Toronto Community Housing Corporation owns and maintains 12 affordable housing facilities in Ward 11, 8 operated by Toronto Community Housing Corporation, and 4 operated by Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation. Seven of them require upgrades to improve security, landscaping and energy management. Toronto Community Housing Corporation has requested funds for the following capital upgrades at these affordable housing buildings in Ward 11: Address Scope of Work Estimated Budget 250 Davenport Road Landscaping and drainage improvements, parking reconfiguration and security (CCTV) $225,000 177 Pendrith Street Solar Panels $846,000 40 Asquith Avenue Security (CCTV) $275,000 341 Bloor Street Security (CCTV) $400,000 25 Elm Street In Suite/Common Area Lighting upgrades $310,000 72 Clinton Street Landscaping $220,000 34 Oxford Street Solar Panels $90,000 Total $2,366,000.00 The Ward Councillor proposes to fund these upgrades with Section 37 and Section 45 community benefit funds earmarked for capital upgrades at Toronto Community Housing Corporation and/or affordable housing.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council increase the 2026-2035 Capital Budget and Plan for Toronto Community Housing Corporation, through the Housing Secretariat under WBS element CAF010-03, on a one-time basis by $2,366,000 gross and $0 debt, for landscaping, security, and energy upgrades at existing Toronto Community Housing Corporation buildings in Ward 11, fully funded from Section 37 and Section 45 community benefits secured for capital improvements at Toronto Community Housing Corporation and/or affordable housing from the developments listed below: a. 275 Albany Avenue and 420 Dupont Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701050) in the amount of $84,634, secured for capital improvements; b. 316 Bloor Street West (Source Account: XR3026-3701254) in the amount of $260,722, secured for capital improvements; c. 840 and 860 Dupont Street (XR3026-3701345) in the amount of $110,000, secured for capital improvements; d. 164 Avenue Road (XR3028-4500159) in the amount of $32,997, secured for capital improvements; e. 124 and 128 Pears Avenue (XR3026-3700793) in the amount of $168,420, secured for capital improvements; f. 11 Yorkville Avenue (XR3028-4500246) in the amount of $474,164, secured for capital improvements; g. 767-773 Yonge Street (XR3026-3701233) in the amount of $817,366, secured for capital improvements; and h. 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street (XR3026-3701225) in the amount of $417,697, secured for capital improvements.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that: 1. City Council increase the 2026-2035 Capital Budget and Plan for Toronto Community Housing Corporation, through the Housing Secretariat under WBS element CAF010-03, on a one-time basis by $2,366,000 gross and $0 debt, for landscaping, security, and energy upgrades at existing Toronto Community Housing Corporation buildings in Ward 11, fully funded from Section 37 and Section 45 community benefits secured for capital improvements at Toronto Community Housing Corporation and/or affordable housing from the developments listed below: a. 275 Albany Avenue and 420 Dupont Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701050) in the amount of $84,634, secured for capital improvements; b. 316 Bloor Street West (Source Account: XR3026-3701254) in the amount of $260,722, secured for capital improvements; c. 840 and 860 Dupont Street (XR3026-3701345) in the amount of $110,000, secured for capital improvements; d. 164 Avenue Road (XR3028-4500159) in the amount of $32,997, secured for capital improvements; e. 124 and 128 Pears Avenue (XR3026-3700793) in the amount of $168,420, secured for capital improvements; f. 11 Yorkville Avenue (XR3028-4500246) in the amount of $474,164, secured for capital improvements; g. 767-773 Yonge Street (XR3026-3701233) in the amount of $817,366, secured for capital improvements; and h. 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street (XR3026-3701225) in the amount of $417,697, secured for capital improvements.
CC39.13adopted
On August 10, 2022, Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications were submitted seeking permission for a 28-storey (93 metres, including mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building with retail at-grade along Spadina Avenue. The proposal included retail at grade, two levels of office, and 521 residential units above. The façade of the existing four-storey factory building was proposed to be retained and incorporated into the new development. On May 15, 2024, the owner submitted a revised proposal for a 30-storey (99 metres, including mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building with retail at-grade, no office component, and 550 residential units. On July 9, 2024, the owner appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal due to Council not making a decision on the application within the timeframe prescribed by the Planning Act. The property at 46 Spadina Avenue (including 40, 42, 44 and 50 Spadina Avenue) includes a 4-storey building that was constructed in 1907 with later additions in the 1940s. It is known as the "Systems Building" and is identified as a contributing Industrial/Commercial building within the King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District Plan. The properties at 58 Spadina Avenue (including 60 Spadina Avenue) and 378 Wellington Street West are non-contributing properties in the King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District Plan. On July 16, 2024, the applicant submitted an application under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act to alter the designated Systems Building and demolish three small adjacent buildings to allow for the construction of a new 30-storey mixed-use building within the King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District, which was approved by Council on March 26 and 27, 2025. The owner now seeks Council's consent for revised alterations to the Systems Building. Council requires the advice of the Toronto Preservation Board in respect of matters which may impact a designated heritage property.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the revised report (March 24, 2026) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the revised report (March 24, 2026) from the City Solicitor, at the discretion of the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the revised report (March 24, 2026) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it is about litigation before the Ontario Land Tribunal and contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege. Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the revised report (March 24, 2026) remain confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as about litigation before the Ontario Land Tribunal and contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege. Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the revised report (March 24, 2026) will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor. April 7, 2026 The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 24, 2026) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public, the City Solicitor having exercised the City Solicitor's discretion to make them public, as follows: 1. City Council consent to the application made under subsection 42(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act and approve: a. the alterations to, and erection of a new building or structure on, the designated heritage property at 46 Spadina Avenue in accordance with subsection 42(1)1 and 42(1)2 of the Ontario Heritage Act, with conditions to allow for the construction of a 29-storey mixed-use building at 46-58 Spadina Avenue and 378 Wellington Street West, with such alterations being substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated February 13, 2026, prepared by Wallman Architects Inc., and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects, dated July 22, 2022, as revised and amended on October 29, 2024 and February 13, 2026, on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and subject to the conditions as set out below; and b. the demolition of a non-contributing buildings/structures, and erection of a new building or structure, on the property at 46 Spadina Avenue (the two outbuildings) and 58 Spadina Avenue in accordance with subsection 42(1)4 and 42(1)2 of the Ontario Heritage Act, with conditions to allow for the construction of a 29-storey mixed-use building at 46-58 Spadina Avenue and 378 Wellington Street West with such approval being substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated February 13, 2026, prepared by Wallman Architects Inc., and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects, dated July 22, 2022, as revised and amended on October 29, 2024 and February 13, 2026, on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and subject to the conditions as set out below. 2. City Council direct that its consent to the application made under subsection 42(1)1, 42(1)2 and 42(1)4 of the Ontario Heritage Act for the properties at 46 Spadina Avenue and 58 Spadina Avenue is also subject to the following conditions: a. that the related Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments have come into full force and effect; b. prior to any issuance of any Ontario Land Tribunal Order in connection with the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment appeals for the property at 46-58 Spadina Avenue and 378 Wellington Street West, the Owner shall provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects, dated July 22, 2022, and as revised on October 29, 2024, and on February 13, 2026, which will be revised to illustrate the changes to the projecting balconies on the eastern and southern elevations increasing the height in which they start to at least 17.0 metres, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; c. prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the properties at 46 Spadina Avenue, 58 Spadina Avenue, and 378 Wellington Street West including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building, as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the Owner shall: 1. provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage properties will be sensitively illuminated to enhance their heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; 2. provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject properties, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; 3. submit a Signage Plan for the subject properties to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; 4. provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Part 2.b. above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and 5. provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan; and d. prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Part 2.c.5. above, the Owner shall provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take all necessary and reasonable actions to implement City Council's decision. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (March 24, 2026) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as they pertain to litigation before the Ontario Land Tribunal and contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (March 24, 2026) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1, along with the entirety of Confidential Appendix A to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council, at the discretion of the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it is about litigation before the Ontario Land Tribunal and contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.
MM39.13amended
Recent changes to provincial and municipal planning policy have enabled as-of-right multiplex housing across Toronto's low-rise neighbourhoods as part of the City's housing supply strategy. While these permissions support gentle density and housing choice, concerns have been raised by residents, Councillors, and City staff regarding the design quality and neighbourhood fit of some newly constructed multiplexes. City Planning staff have noted that current zoning regulations provide limited ability to regulate architectural design, materials, and façade treatment for as-of-right multiplexes, particularly where site plan control does not apply. At the same time, staff have identified opportunities to improve design outcomes through monitoring, guidance, engagement with builders, and programmatic measures that encourage higher-quality, contextually appropriate development.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, as part of the forthcoming Multiplex Monitoring Program report to Council, to include a review of the planning design and construction of recently constructed multiplexes and to consider measures to encourage well-designed and contextually-appropriate multiplexes.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, recommends that: 1. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as part of the forthcoming Multiplex Monitoring Program report to Council, to include a review of the design of recently constructed multiplexes and to consider measures to encourage well-designed and contextually-appropriate multiplexes.
CC39.14adopted
This report recommends that Council affirm its decision of December 16 and 17, 2025 (CC35.20) stating its intention to designate the property at 180 Queens Drive under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. The City has received an objection on behalf of the property owner to the Notice of Intention to Designate within the statutory timeline. The Notice of Objection dated January 21, 2025, is included as Attachment 1 to this report. The subject property is located on the northeast corner of Queen's Drive and Pine Street in the Weston neighbourhood. The property at 180 Queens Drive - the Oliver Master House - features a substantial, three-storey house constructed in the Shingle style in 1911. The red-brick house is distinguished by its multiple, shingle-clad gables, broad verandah, and stone corner tower. The property was commissioned for Oliver Master, a prominent insurance broker, Weston village councillor (1912-13) and civic leader. Staff have reviewed the objections raised by the owner and are of the opinion that despite these objections, the property meets Ontario Regulation 9/06, the criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, under three of nine possible criteria for its design/physical, historical/associative, and contextual values. City Council has until April 21, 2026, 90 days from the date of the end of the objection period, or 120 days from the issuance of the Notice of Intention to Designate, to make a decision on this objection as per the timeline under the Ontario Heritage Act. As the property has cultural heritage value or interest and meets the prescribed criteria pursuant to Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, this property should be designated. Designation enables Council to review proposed alterations for the property, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance and refuse demolition.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council affirm its decision to state its intention to designate the property at 180 Queens Drive under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act as set out in Council Decision 2025.PH23.13 on December 16 and 17, 2025. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the Bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning recommends that: 1. City Council affirm its decision to state its intention to designate the property at 180 Queens Drive under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act as set out in Council Decision PH23.13 on December 16 and 17, 2025. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the Bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
MM39.14adopted
Participatory Budgeting is a system of direct democracy where residents imagine how their neighbourhood could be improved, suggest potential ideas and then vote on how funds are spent to improve their community through capital projects. Between April 1 and November 1, 2025, my office hosted online and in-person engagements with local residents and business improvement areas to crowdsource ideas. These ideas were then vetted for cost and feasibility with City staff and presented to the local community to vote on which projects they would like to see funded. In the St. Lawrence Neighbourhood, seven projects supported by the local community fit within the allocated budget of $750,000: a. heritage Plaque at Berczy Park for Late Claude Cormier; b. new Heritage Street Signs for Front Street between Yonge Street and Parliament Street; c.new Heritage Street Banners in St. Lawrence neighbourhood; d. installation of Advanced Shoreline Commemoration Plaques at Yonge Street and Front Street, and Parliament Street and Front Street; e. new Heritage Street Signs for St. Lawrence Heritage Conservation District; f. new Heritage Street Signs for Historic Queen East between Yonge Street and Parliament Street; and g. new Shoreline Commemoration Sidewalk Etching Project from Yonge Street to Parliament Street. The release of funds for these projects will allow for locally supported capital projects to move forward in a timely manner.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council increase the 2026 Operating Budget for Heritage Toronto on a one-time basis by $10,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development at 40 The Esplanade (Source Account: XR3026-3700065), secured for local area streetscape improvements, for the production and installation of a heritage plaque recognizing the late Claude Cormier at 35 Wellington St E. (Cost Centre: HG0001). 2. City Council increase the 2026 Operating Budget for Non-Program for the purpose of forwarding funds to the Old Town Toronto Business Improvement Area for the development of the following projects, as outlined in Appendix A: a. $5,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits at 177, 183, and 179 Front Street East and 15-21 Lower Sherbourne Street and 200 The Esplanade (Source Account: XR3026-3700943) for the purpose of installing ten heritage street banners within the heritage conservation district of the St. Lawrence neighbourhood. (Cost Centre: NP2161); b. $500,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits at 177, 183, and 179 Front Street East and 15-21 Lower Sherbourne Street and 200 The Esplanade (Source Account: XR3026-3700943) for the purpose of installing the Shoreline Commemorative Sidewalk Etching project on Front Street from Yonge Street to Parliament Street. (Cost Centre: NP2161); and c. $80,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits at 177, 183, and 179 Front Street East and 15-21 Lower Sherbourne Street and 200 The Esplanade (Source Account: XR3026-3700943) for the production and installation of Advanced Shoreline Commemoration Plaques at two intersections of Yonge and Front Street, and Parliament and Front Street (Cost Centre: NP2161). 3. City Council direct that the $585,000 be forwarded to the Old Town Toronto Business Improvement Area subject to the Old Town Toronto Business Improvement Area signing an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements. 4. City Council amend the 2026-2035 Capital Budget and Plan for Transportation Services to create a new capital sub-project for the development of the following projects, as outlined in Appendix A: a. $4,000.00 gross, $0 debt, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits at 177, 183, and 179 Front Street East and 15-21 Lower Sherbourne Street and 200 The Esplanade (Source Account: XR3026-3700943) for the purpose of installing ten heritage street signs recognizing cultural corridor locations along Queen Street between Yonge Street and Parliament Street. (WBS Element: Needed from Transportation Services); b. $4,000.00 gross, $0 debt, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits at 177, 183, and 179 Front Street East and 15-21 Lower Sherbourne Street and 200 The Esplanade (Source Account: XR3026-3700943) for the purpose of installing ten heritage street signs recognizing cultural corridor locations along Front Street between Yonge Street and Parliament Street (WBS Element: Needed from Transportation Services); and c. $2,400.00 gross, $0 debt, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits at 177, 183, and 179 Front Street East and 15-21 Lower Sherbourne Street and 200 The Esplanade (Source Account: XR3026-3700943) for the purpose of installing heritage conservation district street signs at the six locations outlined in Appendix A (WBS Element: Needed from Transportation Services).
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll, recommends that: 1. City Council increase the 2026 Operating Budget for Heritage Toronto on a one-time basis by $10,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development at 40 The Esplanade (Source Account: XR3026-3700065), secured for local area streetscape improvements, for the production and installation of a heritage plaque recognizing the late Claude Cormier at 35 Wellington St E. (Cost Centre: HG0001). 2. City Council increase the 2026 Operating Budget for Non-Program for the purpose of forwarding funds to the Old Town Toronto Business Improvement Area for the development of the following projects, as outlined in Appendix A: a. $5,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits at 177, 183, and 179 Front Street East and 15-21 Lower Sherbourne Street and 200 The Esplanade (Source Account: XR3026-3700943) for the purpose of installing ten heritage street banners within the heritage conservation district of the St. Lawrence neighbourhood. (Cost Centre: NP2161); b. $500,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits at 177, 183, and 179 Front Street East and 15-21 Lower Sherbourne Street and 200 The Esplanade (Source Account: XR3026-3700943) for the purpose of installing the Shoreline Commemorative Sidewalk Etching project on Front Street from Yonge Street to Parliament Street. (Cost Centre: NP2161); and c. $80,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits at 177, 183, and 179 Front Street East and 15-21 Lower Sherbourne Street and 200 The Esplanade (Source Account: XR3026-3700943) for the production and installation of Advanced Shoreline Commemoration Plaques at two intersections of Yonge and Front Street, and Parliament and Front Street (Cost Centre: NP2161). 3. City Council direct that the $585,000 be forwarded to the Old Town Toronto Business Improvement Area subject to the Old Town Toronto Business Improvement Area signing an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements. 4. City Council amend the 2026-2035 Capital Budget and Plan for Transportation Services to create a new capital sub-project for the development of the following projects, as outlined in Appendix A: a. $4,000.00 gross, $0 debt, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits at 177, 183, and 179 Front Street East and 15-21 Lower Sherbourne Street and 200 The Esplanade (Source Account: XR3026-3700943) for the purpose of installing ten heritage street signs recognizing cultural corridor locations along Queen Street between Yonge Street and Parliament Street. (WBS Element: Needed from Transportation Services); b. $4,000.00 gross, $0 debt, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits at 177, 183, and 179 Front Street East and 15-21 Lower Sherbourne Street and 200 The Esplanade (Source Account: XR3026-3700943) for the purpose of installing ten heritage street signs recognizing cultural corridor locations along Front Street between Yonge Street and Parliament Street (WBS Element: Needed from Transportation Services); and c. $2,400.00 gross, $0 debt, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits at 177, 183, and 179 Front Street East and 15-21 Lower Sherbourne Street and 200 The Esplanade (Source Account: XR3026-3700943) for the purpose of installing heritage conservation district street signs at the six locations outlined in Appendix A (WBS Element: Needed from Transportation Services).
MM39.15adopted
Participatory Budgeting is a system of direct democracy where residents imagine how their neighbourhood could be improved, suggest potential ideas and then vote on how funds are spent to improve their community through capital projects. Between April 1 and November 1, 2025, my office hosted online and in-person engagements with local residents and business improvement areas to crowdsource ideas. These ideas were then vetted for cost and feasibility with City staff and presented to the local community to vote on which projects they would like to see funded. In the Bay Cloverhill, Bloor East, Church Wellesley and Upper Jarvis Neighbourhoods, two projects supported by the local community fit within the allocated budget of $750,000: a. Wellesley-Magill Park Revitalization; and b. James Canning Park Small Dogs Off Leash Area. The release of funds for these projects will allow for locally supported capital projects to move forward in a timely manner.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend the 2026 Capital Budget for Parks and Recreation to: a. create a new capital sub-project known as the Wellesley Magill Revitalization Project in the Park Development project, with a project cost and cash flow of $250,000.00 gross and $0 debt in 2026, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the development at 59 Richmond Street East and 144 and 130 Church Street secured for outdoor public realm and parkland improvements (Source Account: XR3026-3701221), for the purpose of revitalizing Wellesley Magill Park; and b. create a new capital sub-project known as the James Canning Park Dog Off Leash Area Project in the Park Development project, with a project cost and cash flow of $500,000.00 gross and $0 debt in 2026, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the development at 59 Richmond Street East and 144 and 130 Church Street secured for outdoor public realm and parkland improvements (Source Account: XR3026-3701221), for the purpose of installing a new Dog Off Leash Area at James Canning Park.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll, recommends that: 1. City Council amend the 2026 Capital Budget for Parks and Recreation to: a. create a new capital sub-project known as the Wellesley Magill Revitalization Project in the Park Development project, with a project cost and cash flow of $250,000.00 gross and $0 debt in 2026, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the development at 59 Richmond Street East and 144 and 130 Church Street secured for outdoor public realm and parkland improvements (Source Account: XR3026-3701221), for the purpose of revitalizing Wellesley Magill Park; and b. create a new capital sub-project known as the James Canning Park Dog Off Leash Area Project in the Park Development project, with a project cost and cash flow of $500,000.00 gross and $0 debt in 2026, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the development at 59 Richmond Street East and 144 and 130 Church Street secured for outdoor public realm and parkland improvements (Source Account: XR3026-3701221), for the purpose of installing a new Dog Off Leash Area at James Canning Park.
MM39.16adopted
Participatory Budgeting is a system of direct democracy where residents imagine how their neighbourhood could be improved, suggest potential ideas and then vote on how funds are spent to improve their community through capital projects. Between April 1 and November 1, 2025, my office hosted online and in-person engagements with local residents and business improvement areas to crowdsource ideas. These ideas were then vetted for cost and feasibility with City staff and presented to the local community to vote on which projects they would like to see funded. In the Canary District, Corktown and Distillery District Neighbourhoods, three major projects supported by the local community fit within the allocated budget of $750,000: a. Reimagining Lawren Harris Square; b. Corktown Commons: All-Weather Ping Pong Table; and c. Corktown Commons: Additional Seating. The release of funds for these projects will allow for locally supported capital projects to move forward in a timely manner.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend the 2026 Capital Budget for Parks and Recreation to: a. create a new capital sub-project known as the Lawren Harris Square Reimagining Project in the Park Development project, with a project cost and cash flow of $680,000.00 gross and $0 debt in 2026, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the development at 241 Church Street secured for outdoor public realm and parkland improvements (Source Account: XR3026-3701430), for the purpose of revitalizing the Lawren Harris Square; b. create a new capital sub-project known as the Corktown Commons All Weather Ping Pong Table project in the Park Development project, with a project cost and cash flow of $10,000.00 gross and $0 debt in 2026, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the development at 241 Church Street secured for outdoor public realm and parkland improvements (Source Account: XR3026-3701430), for the purpose of increasing all season activities at Corktown Commons; and c. create a new capital sub-project known as the Corktown Commons: Additional Seating project in the Park Development project, with a project cost and cash flow of $10,000.00 gross and $0 debt in 2026, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the development at 241 Church Street secured for outdoor public realm and parkland improvements (Source Account: XR3026-3701430), for the purpose of installing 10 park benches within Corktown Commons.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll, recommends that: 1. City Council amend the 2026 Capital Budget for Parks and Recreation to: a. create a new capital sub-project known as the Lawren Harris Sqaure Reimagining Project in the Park Development project, with a project cost and cash flow of $680,000.00 gross and $0 debt in 2026, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the development at 241 Church Street secured for outdoor public realm and parkland improvements (Source Account: XR3026-3701430), for the purpose of revitalizing the Lawren Harris Square; b. create a new capital sub-project known as the Corktown Commons All Weather Ping Pong Table project in the Park Development project, with a project cost and cash flow of $10,000.00 gross and $0 debt in 2026, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the development at 241 Church Street secured for outdoor public realm and parkland improvements (Source Account: XR3026-3701430), for the purpose of increasing all season activities at Corktown Commons; and c. create a new capital sub-project known as the Corktown Commons: Additional Seating project in the Park Development project, with a project cost and cash flow of $10,000.00 gross and $0 debt in 2026, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the development at 241 Church Street secured for outdoor public realm and parkland improvements (Source Account: XR3026-3701430), for the purpose of installing 10 park benches within Corktown Commons.
MM39.17adopted
Brock Public School, founded in 1887, is a vibrant and inclusive elementary school located at the heart of a growing Davenport community. Brock is widely recognized as a welcoming environment that supports student success and contributes positively to the surrounding neighbourhood. In 2023, the Brock Public School Parent Council created a vision to transform the schoolyard into a vibrant, inclusive, and multifunctional space that supports play, exploration, gathering, and learning for both students and community members. Working closely with the Toronto District School Board and the local school community, the Parent Council created a plan to advance a comprehensive schoolyard revitalization project that prioritized well-being and environmental learning. This project marks the largest infrastructure initiative in the school's history, including both Toronto District School Board-funded structural improvements and enhancements to further improve the space. Through extensive community consultation, a final design was created that includes upgrades to play and gathering areas. The proposed additions will better enable outdoor learning opportunities across science, art, and gym activities. The revitalization effort has been driven largely by exceptional community leadership. The Parent Council has actively fundraised to support this project through weekend events, direct donations, and even silent auctions. These efforts speak to the dedication and commitment shared by families and neighbours in investing in their local school. With the community having already mobilized significant resources and momentum, the City of Toronto's release of Section 37 funding represents a critical opportunity to bring this long-standing vision to completion. This investment would build upon substantial community-led contributions and ensure that Brock Public School's revitalized schoolyard becomes a vibrant outdoor space that supports learning, creativity, and community connection for years to come.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council increase the 2026 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $30,000 gross, $0 net, (Cost Centre: NP2161) fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained in the development at 158, 164, 181 and 200 Sterling Road (Source Account: XR3026- 3701340), secured for park improvements, for the purpose of providing one-time capital funding to the Toronto District School Board for capital improvements to the schoolyard at Brock Public School, subject to the following conditions: a. the Toronto District School Board will enter into an acceptable Community Access Agreement with the City; and b. the design of the improvements will be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the General Manager, Parks, and Recreation, in consultation with the Ward Councillor. 2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, and Recreation, to participate in the preparation of the Community Access Agreement, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, provided acceptable terms can be agreed upon. 3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to execute on behalf of the Community Access Agreement with the Toronto District School Board for the capital improvements to the schoolyard at Brock Public School, for a term of 20 years and on such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor. 4. City Council direct that if a mutually acceptable Community Access Agreement cannot be agreed upon that the funds will not be transferred to the Toronto District School Board and shall be made available for other community benefits in the community.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that: 1. City Council increase the 2026 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $30,000 gross, $0 net, (Cost Centre: NP2161) fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained in the development at 158, 164, 181 and 200 Sterling Road (Source Account: XR3026- 3701340), secured for park improvements, for the purpose of providing one-time capital funding to the Toronto District School Board for capital improvements to the schoolyard at Brock Public School, subject to the following conditions: a. the Toronto District School Board will enter into an acceptable Community Access Agreement with the City; and b. the design of the improvements will be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the General Manager, Parks, and Recreation, in consultation with the Ward Councillor. 2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, and Recreation, to participate in the preparation of the Community Access Agreement, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, provided acceptable terms can be agreed upon. 3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to execute on behalf of the Community Access Agreement with the Toronto District School Board for the capital improvements to the schoolyard at Brock Public School, for a term of 20 years and on such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor. 4. City Council direct that if a mutually acceptable Community Access Agreement cannot be agreed upon that the funds will not be transferred to the Toronto District School Board and shall be made available for other community benefits in the community.
MM39.18adopted
In 1976, construction workers discovered a large set of antlers and a portion of a skull while excavating Islington subway station. The specimen was eventually identified and classified as a new prehistoric species, Torontoceros hypogaeus - meaning "horned Toronto deer from underground". It was lovingly given the nickname Toronto Subway Deer. This creature would have walked with mammoths during the last ice age about 11,300 years ago. As the climate warmed, its habitat disappeared, and eventually the species went extinct. The antlers discovered at Islington station are currently the only known evidence of this species of prehistoric deer. As of September 2025, new DNA technology has confirmed the subway deer is most closely related to mule deer and white-tailed deer. Originally, the antlers' shape led scientists to believe it was part of the caribou family. The Subway Deer antlers are currently on display at the Royal Ontario Museum. This specimen is a tangible connection to the days when giants roamed the earth. The plaque will be placed at Islington station near the site of the antlers' discovery.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council increase the 2026 Operating Budget for Heritage Toronto on a one-time basis by $10,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development at 2 Fieldway Road (Source Account: XR3026-3700445), secured for streetscape improvements, for the production and installation of a heritage plaque in the vicinity of Islington station recognizing the Toronto Subway Deer (Cost Centre: HG0001).
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Amber Morley, seconded by Councillor Jamaal Myers, recommends that: 1. City Council increase the 2026 Operating Budget for Heritage Toronto on a one-time basis by $10,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development at 2 Fieldway Road (Source Account: XR3026-3700445), secured for streetscape improvements, for the production and installation of a heritage plaque in the vicinity of Islington station recognizing the Toronto Subway Deer (Cost Centre: HG0001).
MM39.19adopted
This motion seeks to fund the preservation of the Zhong Hua Men Archway, an iconic landmark and beautiful gateway to East Chinatown. This motion proposes to provide a total of $28,638.23 of Section 37 funds from the development at 90 to 100 Broadview Avenue, which were specifically secured and collected for the contribution to the Chinese Archway Reserve Fund. The funds will go towards the preventative care of the Archway and the Chinese Lion sculptures to support their long-term preservation. The Zhong Hua Men Archway located at Broadview Avenue and Gerrard Street East officially opened in the fall of 2009. This joint project between the City of Toronto and the Chinese Chamber of Commerce (East Toronto) was built in commemoration of the historic and current contributions of the Chinese community to all aspects of Canadian society. The Zhong Hua Men Archway is adorned by two marble lion statues that were donated to the City of Toronto by The People's Republic of China. The lions were installed in 2005 and are a tribute to Chinese art, culture, and the vibrance of East Toronto Chinatown. Gateways based on traditional Chinese architecture are hallmarks of Chinatowns around the world. Known as 'Paifeng', these archways continue the custom of public sites that honour the great achievements of ancestors in the sharing of goodwill and wisdom. Preserving the Zhong Hua Men Chinese Archway will protect this significant site for future generations, ensuring it remains a testament to Toronto's diversity and the contributions of the Chinese community to our city and country.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council increase the 2026 Operating Budget for Economic Development and Culture on a one-time basis by $28,638.23 gross and $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development at 90 to 100 Broadview Avenue (Source Account: XR3026-3700348), to fund the preservation of the Zhong Hua Men Archway (Cost Centre: AH0033).
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that: 1. City Council increase the 2026 Operating Budget for Economic Development and Culture on a one-time basis by $28,638.23 gross and $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development at 90 to 100 Broadview Avenue (Source Account: XR3026-3700348), to fund the preservation of the Zhong Hua Men Archway (Cost Centre: AH0033).
MM39.20adopted
At its meeting on May 21 and 22, 2025, City Council adopted Item 2025.TE22.3 , approving a Zoning By-law Amendment application for the property at 72 Perth Avenue, which included a recommendation requiring an on-site parkland dedication having a minimum area of 134 square metres located along the western property boundary, directly adjacent to and an expansion of the West Toronto Railpath. The remaining parkland dedication is to be satisfied through payment of cash-in-lieu. There have been subsequent council approvals to increase the height and density of the development, however the parkland dedication size remained the same. Through detailed review of the related Site Plan Control application, it has come to staff's attention that the on-site parkland dedication area illustrated on the submitted site plan drawings is less than the required 134 square metres, with the actual size being 131 square metres. The applicant has informed parks staff that the proposed building associated with the Zoning By-law Amendment approval may have openings along the western wall that may trigger a Building Code requirement for the need for a Limiting Distance Agreement to be registered on a the eastern portion of the parkland to be transferred to the City that would prevent the erection of a buildings or structures within the limiting distance lands. The affected land is 131 square metres in area. If the Limiting Distance Agreement encumbrance is acceptable to the Executive Director, Development Review, the encumbrance would be subject to the payment of compensation to the City. This Motion seeks authority from City Council to accept the reduced on-site parkland dedication with the difference being satisfied through cash-in-lieu payment and to add a Limiting Distance Agreement as a permitted encumbrance to the parkland to be conveyed to the City. Requires Re-opening: Toronto and East York Community Council Item 2025.TE22.3 (May 21 and 22, 2025 Council Meeting), only as it pertains to Parts 6 and 8.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.TE22.3 by: a. deleting the words "134 square metres" in Part 6 and replacing them with the words "131 square metres", so that Part 6 now reads as follows: 6. City Council approve that in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, the owner shall convey to the City an on-site parkland dedication, having a minimum size of 131 square metres, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the City Solicitor. b. adding to the end of Part 8 the words "the owner may propose the exception of an encumbrance of a registered limiting distance agreement that would encumber the 131 square metres of the parkland dedication, where such an encumbrances is deemed acceptable by the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the City Solicitor; and such an encumbrance will be subject to the payment of compensation to the City, in an amount as determined by the Executive Director, Development Review and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management", so that Part 8 now reads as follows: 8. City Council approve the acceptance of on-site parkland dedication, subject to the owner transferring the parkland to the City free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances, and encroachments, in an acceptable environmental condition; the owner may propose the exception of an encumbrance of a registered limiting distance agreement that would encumber the 131 square metres of the parkland dedication, where such an encumbrances is deemed acceptable by the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the City Solicitor; and such an encumbrance will be subject to the payment of compensation to the City, in an amount as determined by the Executive Director, Development Review and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.TE22.3 by: a. deleting the words "134 square metres" in Part 6 and replacing them with the words "131 square metres", so that Part 6 now reads as follows: 6. City Council approve that in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, the owner shall convey to the City an on-site parkland dedication, having a minimum size of 131 square metres, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the City Solicitor. b. adding to the end of Part 8 the words "the owner may propose the exception of an encumbrance of a registered limiting distance agreement that would encumber the 131 square metres of the parkland dedication, where such an encumbrances is deemed acceptable by the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the City Solicitor; and such an encumbrance will be subject to the payment of compensation to the City, in an amount as determined by the Executive Director, Development Review and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management", so that Part 8 now reads as follows: 8. City Council approve the acceptance of on-site parkland dedication, subject to the owner transferring the parkland to the City free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances, and encroachments, in an acceptable environmental condition; the owner may propose the exception of an encumbrance of a registered limiting distance agreement that would encumber the 131 square metres of the parkland dedication, where such an encumbrances is deemed acceptable by the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the City Solicitor; and such an encumbrance will be subject to the payment of compensation to the City, in an amount as determined by the Executive Director, Development Review and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management.
MM39.21adopted
At its meeting of June 8 and 9, 2021, Toronto City Council adopted Item 2021.TE25.3 approving Zoning Amendments and a Rental Housing Demolition Application to demolish five rental dwelling units located at 111 to 125 River Street, which included conditions that must be met prior to issuance of the rental housing demolition permit. The dwelling units at 111 to 125 River Street are currently vacant. Due to health and safety concerns, the applicant would like to demolish the dwelling units located at 111 to 125 River Street immediately. While the demolition is appropriate, market conditions have left some sites who have received prior approval to permit demolition ahead of construction as empty lots. Rather than leaving the lot fenced and vacant until construction can occur, the applicant has agreed to explore options for an interim community use in consultation with my office. Requires Re-opening: Toronto and East York Community Council 2021.TE25.3 (June 8 and 9, 2021 Council Meeting) only as it pertains to Part 6d.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on item 2021.TE25.3 by deleting Part 6.d. 6. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 for the demolition of the five (5) existing rental dwelling units located at 111-125 River Street after all the following have occurred: Part to be deleted: d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits (conditional or full permit) for the approved development on the site; 2. City Council request the applicant to explore an interim community use for 111 to 125 River Street in consultation with the local City Councillor.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll, recommends that: 1. City Council amend its previous decision on item 2021.TE25.3 by deleting Part 6.d. 6. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 for the demolition of the five (5) existing rental dwelling units located at 111-125 River Street after all the following have occurred: Part to be deleted: d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits (conditional or full permit) for the approved development on the site; 2. City Council request the applicant to explore an interim community use for 111 to 125 River Street in consultation with the local City Councillor.
MM39.22adopted
When the National Hockey League was founded in 1917, its Toronto team played at the Arena Gardens on Mutual Street. Known as simply "Toronto" or the Toronto Arenas, the team was renamed the Toronto St. Patricks two years later. Conn Smythe bought and renamed the franchise the Toronto Maple Leafs in 1927. Smythe changed the name to honor Canada's soldiers who wore the maple leaf while fighting during the First World War. He also changed the team's colors from green and white to blue and white. The Leafs played at the Mutual Street Arena for its first 14 seasons before moving to the newly built Maple Leaf Gardens in 1931. The Maple Leafs are one of the "Original Six" National Hockey League teams and have won the Stanley Cup 13 times (11 as the Maple Leafs, one as the Arenas, and one as the St. Patricks). The plaque will focus on 100 years of Maple Leafs history in Toronto, from the club's formation to the present day.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council increase the 2026 Operating Budget for Heritage Toronto on a one-time basis by $10,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development at 203 Jarvis Street (Source Account: XR3026 -3701111), secured for streetscape improvements, for the production and installation of a heritage plaque at 78 Mutual Street to commemorate the site where the Toronto Maple Leaf's first played hockey (Cost Centre: HG0001).
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Stephen Holyday, recommends that: 1. City Council increase the 2026 Operating Budget for Heritage Toronto on a one-time basis by $10,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development at 203 Jarvis Street (Source Account: XR3026 -3701111), secured for streetscape improvements, for the production and installation of a heritage plaque at 78 Mutual Street to commemorate the site where the Toronto Maple Leaf's first played hockey (Cost Centre: HG0001).
MM39.23adopted
Over the past year, following the Governance and Operational Review of Moss Park Arena, my office has worked closely with Parks and Recreation staff and the Moss Park Arena Board to support a comprehensive transformation of the facility's operations and governance. That collaborative work has yielded meaningful results: the Arena Board has developed and adopted a Strategic Plan, implemented significant operational and maintenance efficiencies, and is now positioned to move forward with a major capital revitalization. As part of the broader reconstruction of the John Innes Community Centre, Moss Park Arena will undergo significant renovations, including the installation of a new refrigeration plant, two new electric Zambonis, lighting upgrades, washroom and change room upgrades, flooring replacement, a new sound system and scoreboard, and a new digital sign and awning at the facility's entrance. Construction is scheduled to commence in the summer of 2027 and is expected to be completed in 2028. The majority of this project has been funded through the City's 10-year capital plan as part of the facility's State of Good Repair program. However, several enhancements fall outside the original scope of that capital allocation, elements that are nonetheless essential to delivering a facility that meets the needs of the Moss Park community and reflects the full ambition of the revitalization. This motion seeks to release $300,000 in secured community benefits funding to support these additional improvements, in order to ensure the completed facility provides residents, athletes, and community members with a modern, accessible, and well-equipped arena for years to come.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council increase the 2026-2035 Capital Budget for Parks and Recreation for the purpose of capital improvements to the Moss Park Arena with a total project cost of $300,000.00 gross, $0 debt, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development at 245-285 Queen Street East, 348-410 Richmond Street East, 88-106 Ontario Street and 8-12 Brigden Place (XR3026-3701360), secured for community, recreation and/or cultural space improvements.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that: 1. City Council increase the 2026-2035 Capital Budget for Parks and Recreation for the purpose of capital improvements to the Moss Park Arena with a total project cost of $300,000.00 gross, $0 debt, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development at 245-285 Queen Street East, 348-410 Richmond Street East, 88-106 Ontario Street and 8-12 Brigden Place (XR3026-3701360), secured for community, recreation and/or cultural space improvements.
MM39.24adopted
In 2019, the City of Toronto entered into a 15-year lease (comprising an initial 10-year term with one 5-year extension option) for 233 Carlton Street, a three-storey commercial building of approximately 13,000 square feet located in Cabbagetown, at a total lease cost of $6 million. The site was selected to replace the Adelaide Women's Resource Centre at 67 Adelaide Street East - a City-owned property - and to be operated as a 24-hour women's drop-in centre, with the lease commencing January 1, 2020. The property owner was also exempted from property taxes for the full duration of the rental period. An initial renovation estimate of $3.7 million was established for the site and was documented on the Delegated Approval Form tied to the lease. Six years into the lease, the City has paid more than $2 million in rent with no women yet served at the facility. A Freedom of Information request has since revealed that by November 2022, the general contractor, BDA Inc., had been awarded a contract of $8.7 million net of Harmonized Sales Tax, and that forecasted completion costs have since risen to $13.5 million - approximately 3.5 times the original estimate. While there continues to be sufficient Council adopted capital budget enabling this initiative to proceed, total anticipated construction and leasehold improvement costs are expected to ultimately exceed the $10 million threshold for a transaction to proceed under Delegated Approval Authority. Had these costs been known at the initial lease commencement, the threshold would have been exceeded and City Council approval would have been required. In addition, neither my office nor City Council was informed of the cost overruns at any point, despite the scale of the escalation. This motion does not propose changes to the Delegated Authority itself. Rather, it seeks to explicitly require that construction and leasehold improvement costs, which are included in total financial impact calculations of leasing transactions, be clearly identified and considered when proceeding with capital spending, including the issuance of any contract awards, to ensure a higher standard of transparency and accountability going forward.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management to include in all applicable capital project staff reports the full details of any major real estate leasing or acquisition transactions that occurred or must occur in support of delivering the project, including the length, terms, and any conditions of the agreement. 2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to include in all reports related to the award of construction contracts for capital projects on leased or newly acquired property, detailed information on how the proposed construction award aligns with the associated real estate authority where applicable, including but not limited to the transaction type, term, and total capital cost commitments, as well as any changes from the original financial estimates, and the rationale demonstrating how any revised approach remains financially sustainable. 3. City Council direct the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to report to the General Government Committee as required or as part of an annual report of real estate transactions authorized through delegated authority, on any leased or newly acquired property where construction and leasehold costs reach or exceed the financial impact described in the Delegated Approval Form associated with a transaction. 4. City Council direct that no further financial commitments shall be made until Council has received and considered any report required under Recommendation 3, unless the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, determines that an urgent operational need exists, in which case the matter shall be reported to City Council at the earliest opportunity.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by James Pasternak, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management to include in all applicable capital project staff reports the full details of any major real estate leasing or acquisition transactions that occurred or must occur in support of delivering the project, including the length, terms, and any conditions of the agreement. 2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to include in all reports related to the award of construction contracts for capital projects on leased or newly acquired property, detailed information on how the proposed construction award aligns with the associated real estate authority where applicable, including but not limited to the transaction type, term, and total capital cost commitments, as well as any changes from the original financial estimates, and the rationale demonstrating how any revised approach remains financially sustainable. 3. City Council direct the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to report to the General Government Committee as required or as part of an annual report of real estate transactions authorized through delegated authority, on any leased or newly acquired property where construction and leasehold costs reach or exceed the financial impact described in the Delegated Approval Form associated with a transaction. 4. City Council direct that no further financial commitments shall be made until Council has received and considered any report required under Recommendation 3, unless the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, determines that an urgent operational need exists, in which case the matter shall be reported to City Council at the earliest opportunity.
MM39.25withdrawn
In June 2025, the Province put both the Toronto District School Board and the Toronto District Catholic School Board under supervision, stripping the school board trustees of their powers. Since then, the seat on the Board of Health occupied by the elected school board representative has been effectively vacant but is still counted towards quorum. As a result, the Board of Health has faced significant challenges meeting and maintaining quorum. Like many of you, I believe that we need to continue to have elected school board trustees, however, the Provincial Government has not announced their long-term plan for school board trustees, and has indicated that they may abolish the elected trustee system altogether. In the meantime, the Board of Health cannot continue facing quorum as a barrier to addressing pressing public health issues. As the Province will have to decide the fate of school board trustees at some time before municipal elections take place across Ontario this fall, I am recommending that the Board of Health composition be amended to remove the requirement for an elected school board representative and instead introduce an additional citizen member until the end of the current term.
Member Motion MM39.25 was withdrawn at City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, recommends that: 1. City Council amend the composition of the Board of Health for the balance of the term of Council by removing the education representative and increasing the number of public members by one, effective immediately, so that the composition of the Board of Health is as follows: a. 6 Members of Council; and b. 7 public members. 2. City Council rescind the appointment of Ida Li Preti, Trustee, Toronto Catholic District School, to the Board of Health, effective immediately.
MM39.26adopted
An application has been submitted to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for a liquor licence at the premises at 1312 St. Clair Avenue West operating under the name Alpine Espresso Bar. (the "Belvedere Bar & Grill"). The application is for an indoor area. This Motion requests that City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that this application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence. This premises is located in close proximity to residential units. There are concerns related to noise, litter, safety, and other potential disturbances to residents in the area. If conditions are put in place, these concerns may be mitigated. Under no circumstance should the establishment be granted a liquor sales license without conditions attached.
City Council on March 25 and 26, 2026, adopted the following: 1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the issuance of a liquor licence for Alpine Espresso Bar, 1312 St. Clair Avenue West (the "Belvedere Bar & Grill") is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents unless conditions are placed on the licence, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application; 2. City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to be made party to any proceedings with respect to Alpine Espresso Bar, 1312 St. Clair Avenue West (the "Belvedere Bar & Grill"). 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions to give effect to City Council decision's, including adding conditions to any liquor licence issued for Alpine Espresso Bar, 1312 St. Clair Avenue West (the "Belvedere Bar & Grill"), in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
Staff recommendation as filed
Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the issuance of a liquor licence for Alpine Espresso Bar, 1312 St. Clair Avenue West (the "Belvedere Bar & Grill") is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents unless conditions are placed on the licence, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application; 2. City Council request that the Licence Appeal Tribunal provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to be made party to any proceedings with respect to the Premises. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and be directed to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.