Toronto Preservation Board
The full agenda, as filed
All 10 items in the clerk’s order. Each carries the city’s own words: the staff recommendation, what the body decided, and its status. Nothing below is written by us.
PB15.1adopted
Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 65 George Street
This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the listed heritage property at 65 George Street that contains a significant built heritage resource originally known as the Little York Hotel Stables and Coach House, under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value. Located within the boundary of the original Town of York, the Little York Hotel stables and coach house at 65 George Street were constructed in 1880 as part of the Little York Hotel at 187 King Street East to the designs of the architects Langley, Langley & Burke. The property at 65 George Street was included on the City's Heritage Register in 1984. The property at 187 King Street East was included on the Heritage Register in 1973, and designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in 1979 with a Heritage Easement Agreement registered in 1980. Both properties were identified as contributing in the St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District adopted by City Council in 2015 and currently under appeal. The 65 George Street property is the subject of a development application under the Planning Act to allow for the construction of a seventeen storey residential building that would result in the demolition of the heritage building. This application has been refused by Council. The owner has appealed Council's decision to the Local Planning Appeals Tribunal. City staff have completed further research and evaluation of the property at 65 George Street and have determined that the property meets Ontario Regulation 9/06, the criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, for its design, associative and contextual value. Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies. Designation enables City Council to review alterations to the site, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance, and refuse demolition.
The Toronto Preservation Board recommends to the Toronto and East York Community Council that: 1. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 65 George Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 65 George Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 3 to the report (March 10, 2020) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 2. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council. 3. If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed designation to the Conservation Review Board. 4. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision to designate the property.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning recommends that: 1. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 65 George Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 65 George Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 3 to the report (March 10, 2020) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 2. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council. 3. If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed designation to the Conservation Review Board. 4. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision to designate the property.
PB15.2adopted
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the property at 582 King Street West, including 590 and 592 King Street West and 471 and 473 Adelaide Street West, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to allow for the construction of a mixed use building over the heritage buildings on the site as per the revised plans and drawings submitted to the City in conjunction with an appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT") of an application to amend the Zoning By-law.
The Toronto Preservation Board recommends to the Toronto and East York Community Council that: 1. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 582 King Street West, including 590 and 592 King Street West and 471 and 473 Adelaide Street West, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to allow for the construction of a mixed use building that includes alterations to the heritage buildings in conjunction with an appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) for the requested amendment to the Zoning By-law for the lands municipally known as 582 King Street West, including 590 and 592 King Street West and 471 and 473 Adelaide Street West (collectively the "Lands") comprised of the revised plans and drawings prepared by KFA Architects and Planners Inc. dated March 13, 2020 and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prepared by GBCA Architects dated February 28, 2020, both on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and subject to the following additional conditions: a. Prior to issuance of an Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) order for the Zoning By-law Amendment for the Lands, the owner shall: 1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 582 King Street West, including 590 and 592 King Street West and 471 and 473 Adelaide Street West, substantially in accordance with plans and drawings prepared by KFA Architects and Planners Inc. dated March 13, 2020, and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prepared by GBCA Architects dated February 28, 2020, subject to and in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation1.a.2, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. 2. The owner shall provide a detailed Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for the Lands dated February 28, 2020, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 3. Withdraw their appeal(s) of the King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District Plan, and if not an appellant, but rather a party to such appeals, the owner shall withdraw as a party and not seek any party or participant status on the appeals. b. Prior to Final Site Plan approval in connection with the Zoning By-law Amendment for the Lands, or any part of the Lands, the owner shall: 1. Provide final site plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.2 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 2. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 3. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the buildings on the subject property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. c. Prior to the issuance of any permit for all, or any part of the Lands, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage buildings as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, the owner shall: 1. Obtain final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law amendment required for the alterations to the Lands, where such amendments to have been approved by City Council and by the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) Order and such amendments have come into effect in a form and with content acceptable to the City. 2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.2 including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Heritage Lighting Plan and Interpretation Plan. d. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 1.c.3. the owner shall: 1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation, lighting and interpretation has been completed in accordance with the relevant approved plans and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 2. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property at 582 King Street West, including 590 and 592 King Street West and 471 and 473 Adelaide Street West, in a form and with content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and Chief Planner ad Executive Director, City Planning. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 582 King Street West, including 590 and 592 King Street West and 471 and 473 Adelaide Street West.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning recommends that: 1. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 582 King Street West, including 590 and 592 King Street West and 471 and 473 Adelaide Street West, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to allow for the construction of a mixed use building that includes alterations to the heritage buildings in conjunction with an appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT") for the requested amendment to the Zoning By-law for the lands municipally known as 582 King Street West, including 590 and 592 King Street West and 471 and 473 Adelaide Street West (collectively the "Lands") comprised of the revised plans and drawings prepared by KFA Architects and Planners Inc. dated March 13, 2020 and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prepared by GBCA Architects dated February 28, 2020, both on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and subject to the following additional conditions: a. Prior to issuance of an LPAT order for the Zoning By-law Amendment for the Lands, the owner shall: 1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 582 King Street West, including 590 and 592 King Street West and 471 and 473 Adelaide Street West, substantially in accordance with plans and drawings prepared by KFA Architects and Planners Inc. dated March 13, 2020, and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prepared by GBCA Architects dated February 28, 2020, subject to and in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation1.a.2, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. 2. The owner shall provide a detailed Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for the Lands dated February 28, 2020, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 3. Withdraw their appeal(s) of the King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District Plan, and if not an appellant, but rather a party to such appeals, the owner shall withdraw as a party and not seek any party or participant status on the appeals. b. Prior to Final Site Plan approval in connection with the Zoning By-law Amendment for the Lands, or any part of the Lands, the owner shall: 1. Provide final site plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.2 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 2. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 3. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the buildings on the subject property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager Heritage Planning. c. Prior to the issuance of any permit for all, or any part of the Lands, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage buildings as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the owner shall: 1. Obtain final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law amendment required for the alterations to the Lands, where such amendments to have been approved by City Council and by the LPAT Order and such amendments have come into effect in a form and with content acceptable to the City. 2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.2 including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Heritage Lighting Plan and Interpretation Plan. d. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 1.c.3. the owner shall: 1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation, lighting and interpretation has been completed in accordance with the relevant approved plans and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 2. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property at 582 King Street West, including 590 and 592 King Street West and 471 and 473 Adelaide Street West, in a form and with content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and Chief Planner ad Executive Director, City Planning Division. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 582 King Street West, including 590 and 592 King Street West and 471 and 473 Adelaide Street West.
PB15.3adopted
Alterations to a Property Designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act - 129 Bedford Road
This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations at the existing two-and-a-half-storey house at 129 Bedford Road. This property is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act as part of the East Annex Heritage Conservation District (EAHCD). It includes a house that was constructed in the 1890s and is a Category "C" property within the EAHCD. Category "C" buildings are noted as those which "retain much of their original character and are vital reminders of a community's past." The guidelines for this Heritage Conservation District seek to discourage alterations or additions to the street façade of buildings, "except where such alterations are intended to restore the original appearance of the building." The subject property is located at the corner of Bedford Road and Bernard Avenue and therefore has two street facing facades. The proposals seeks to alter one of the window openings along the secondary Bernard Avenue frontage to create a doorway. These alterations are considered to be minor and are not anticipated to have a significant impact on the appearance of the building as viewed from the public realm.
The Toronto Preservation Board recommends to the Toronto and East York Community Council that: 1. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage building at 129 Bedford Road, in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for alterations in connection with the installation of a new entrance door on lands known municipally as 129 Bedford Road, with such alterations substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Sixteen Degrees Studio Inc., dated February 21, 2020 and filed with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning subject to the following: a. That prior to the issuance of any heritage permit for the property at 129 Bedford Road, but excluding permits for interior work, repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, the applicant provide the following to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning: 1. Final building permit drawings for the proposed alterations consistent with the plans and elevations submitted by the applicant and prepared by Sixteen Degrees Studio Inc., dated February 21, 2020. 2. A detailed landscape plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design City Planning recommends that: 1. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage building at 129 Bedford Road, in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for alterations in connection with the installation of a new entrance door on lands known municipally as 129 Bedford Road, with such alterations substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Sixteen Degrees Studio Inc., dated February 21, 2020 and filed with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning subject to the following: a. That prior to the issuance of any heritage permit for the property at 129 Bedford Road, but excluding permits for interior work, repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the applicant provide the following to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning: 1. Final building permit drawings for the proposed alterations consistent with the plans and elevations submitted by the applicant and prepared by Sixteen Degrees Studio Inc., dated February 21, 2020. 2. A detailed landscape plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
PB15.4adopted
Amendment of Designating By-law to Correct Legal Description - 206 Russell Hill Road
This report recommends that City Council state its intention to amend City of Toronto By-law 335-2020 designating the property at 206 Russell Hill Road under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act to correct the legal description. By-Law 335-2020 designating the property at 206 Russell Hill Road, which contains a 2½-storey detached house form building that was constructed in 1910 for William Sefton Hodgens (1878-1963), included an incorrect legal description. The proposed amendment to the by-law would correct the legal description. This will have no impact on the Statement of Significance (Reasons for Designation) in the original report to City Council recommending the property's designation.
The Toronto Preservation Board recommends to the Toronto and East York Community Council that: 1. City Council state its intention to amend By-law 335-2020 dated April 30, 2020, to correct the legal description.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning recommends that: 1. City Council state its intention to amend By-law 335-2020 dated April 30, 2020, to correct the legal description.
PB15.5adopted
This report recommends that City Council include the property at 501 Vesta Drive on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register and state its intention to designate the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value. The property, originally owned and occupied by the renowned philanthropist, Lady Edith J. Baillie, is located on the east side of Vesta Drive near the junction with Forest Hill Road in the Forest Hill South neighbourhood. Prominently sited on a double lot, the Baillie house is an excellent representative of an Arts and Crafts movement house with Tudor Revival style details. Completed in 1930, the finely-crafted, two-and-a-half storey house was designed by the highly-regarded architect Douglas. E. Kertland. In November, 2018, the property was nominated for inclusion on the Heritage Register and designation under the Ontario Heritage Act. Following the sale of the property in June 2019, minor variance applications were submitted in September that involved the demolition of the existing house to allow for the construction of two new houses (one on each of the lots that comprise this property). City staff have completed research and evaluation of the property at 501 Vesta Drive and determined that the property meets Ontario Regulation 9/06, the criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, for its design, associative and contextual value. Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies. Designation enables City Council to review alterations to the site, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance, and refuse demolition.
The Toronto Preservation Board recommends to the Toronto and East York Community Council that: 1. City Council include the property at 501 Vesta Drive on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register. 2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 501 Vesta Drive under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 501 Vesta Drive (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 3 to the report (March 6, 2020) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 3. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council. 4. If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed designation to the Conservation Review Board. 5. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision to designate the property.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, City Planning, recommends that: 1. City Council include the property at 501 Vesta Drive on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register. 2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 501 Vesta Drive under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 501 Vesta Drive (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 3 to the report (March 6, 2020) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, City Planning. 3. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council. 4. If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed designation to the Conservation Review Board. 5. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision to designate the property.
PB15.6adopted
Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - 106-114 Queen Street East
This report recommends that City Council include the properties at 106-114 Queen Street East on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register for their cultural heritage value. This row of five attached properties completed together in 1886-1887 contains three-storey, Victorian-era brick, mixed-use (residential and commercial) buildings located on the north side of Queen Street East between Mutual and Jarvis streets in the Garden District neighbourhood. The five properties comprise part of a longer terrace of eight buildings in total. The three properties at 100-104 Queen Street East are concurrently being considered in a separate report, as they form the subject of an active development site and application at 98-104 Queen Street East and 3 Mutual Street. Following further research and evaluation, it has been determined that each of the five properties at 106-114 Queen Street East meet Ontario Regulation 9/06, the criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, which the City of Toronto also applies when evaluating properties for its Heritage Register. Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies.
The Toronto Preservation Board recommends to the Toronto and East York Community Council that: 1. City Council include the following five properties on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with the Statement of Significance (Reasons for Inclusion), attached as Attachment 3 to the report (June 3, 2020) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning 106 Queen Street East 108 Queen Street East 110 Queen Street East 112 Queen Street East 114 Queen Street East
Staff recommendation as filed
The Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning recommends that: 1. City Council include the following five properties on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with the Statement of Significance (Reasons for Inclusion), attached as Attachment 3 to the report (June 3, 2020) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning 106 Queen Street East 108 Queen Street East 110 Queen Street East 112 Queen Street East 114 Queen Street East
PB15.7amended
This report recommends that City Council include the property at 1150 Eglinton Avenue East on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, and state its intention to designate the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, approve the alterations proposed for the heritage property in connection with a proposed development of the subject property and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the subject property. The Former IBM (Canada) Headquarters building is located within Block 12 of the 60-acre master planned Crosstown community. Five buildings are proposed within Block 12, including three residential towers of 32, 39 and 34 storeys respectively, located behind the south facade of the IBM building. The new construction will incorporate approximately 50 percent of the total elevation of the IBM building as a base building.
The Toronto Preservation Board recommends to the North York Community Council that: 1. City Council include the property at 1150 Eglinton Avenue East on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register. 2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 1150 Eglinton Avenue East under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 1150 Eglinton Avenue East (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 4 to the report (March 5, 2020) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 3. If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. 4. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board. 5. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property. 6. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 1150 Eglinton Avenue East, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a 60-acre master planned community known as Crosstown on the lands known municipally in the year 2020 as 844 Don Mills Road and 1150 Eglinton Avenue East, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated October 25, 2019, prepared by Core Architects Inc. and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning; and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by Goldsmith Borgal and Company Ltd. Architects, dated February 13, 2018, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and subject to the following additional conditions: a. That prior to final Site Plan approval for the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, for the property located at 1150 Eglinton Avenue East the owner shall: 1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 1150 Eglinton Avenue East in accordance with the plans and drawings dated October 25, 2019, prepared by Core Architects Inc. and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by Goldsmith Borgal and Company Ltd. Architects, dated February 13, 2018, and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.a.2 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. 2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 1150 Eglinton Avenue East prepared by Goldsmith Borgal and Company Ltd. Architects, dated February 13, 2018 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 3. Provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.a.2 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 4. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 5. Provide a detailed landscape plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 6. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning including, but not limited to, commemoration of the original Parkin design (both interior and exterior), the history of IBM within Don Mills and to also include exploration of restoring interior lobby spaces back to their original design for interpretive purposes; and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 7. Submit a Signage Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. b. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 1150 Eglinton Avenue East including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, the owner shall: 1. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.a.2, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 2. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Lighting Plan, Interpretation Plan and Landscape Plan. c. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 6.b.2 above, City Planning, the owner shall: 1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 7. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property at 1150 Eglinton Avenue East in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 8. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property 1150 Eglinton Avenue East. 9. City Council request the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning to report back on a Cultural Heritage Landscape designation for the Eglinton Corridor between the East and West branches of the Don River. 10. City Council request the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning to report back on the outstanding properties assessed in the Don Mills Crossing Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment Study.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning recommends that: 1. City Council include the property at 1150 Eglinton Avenue East on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register. 2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 1150 Eglinton Avenue East under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 1150 Eglinton Avenue East (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 4 to the report March 5, 2020 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 3. If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. 4. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board. 5. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property. 6. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 1150 Eglinton Avenue East, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a 60-acre master planned community known as Crosstown on the lands known municipally in the year 2020 as 844 Don Mills Road and 1150 Eglinton Avenue East, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated October 25, 2019, prepared by Core Architects Inc. and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by Goldsmith Borgal & Company Ltd. Architects, dated February 13, 2018, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and subject to the following additional conditions: a. That prior to final Site Plan approval for the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, for the property located at 1150 Eglinton Avenue East the owner shall: 1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 1150 Eglinton Avenue East in accordance with the plans and drawings dated October 25, 2019, prepared by Core Architects Inc. and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by Goldsmith Borgal & Company Ltd. Architects, dated February 13, 2018, and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.a.2 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. 2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 1150 Eglinton Avenue East prepared by Goldsmith Borgal & Company Ltd. Architects, dated February 13, 2018 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 3. Provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.a.2 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 4. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager Heritage Planning. 5. Provide a detailed landscape plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 6. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 7. Submit a Signage Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. b. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 1150 Eglinton Avenue East including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the owner shall: 1. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.a.2, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 2. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Lighting Plan, Interpretation Plan and Landscape Plan. c. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 6.b.2 above, City Planning Division, the owner shall: 1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 7. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property at 1150 Eglinton Avenue East in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 8. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property 1150 Eglinton Avenue East.
PB15.8adopted
This report recommends that City Council include the property at 292 Main Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, that Council state its Intention to Designate the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, that Council approve the proposed alterations to the heritage property located within the proposed development site at 276-296 Main Street, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the subject property. The proposed development consists of a 27-storey mixed use building, with non-residential space (retail and office) at the ground floor, and residential units above. The proposal results in the relocation of the heritage building at 292 Main Street within the property envelope, moving it primarily north and slightly east, so that it retains its relationship with Main Street.
The Toronto Preservation Board recommends to the Toronto and East York Community Council that: 1. City Council include the property at 292 Main Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register. 2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 292 Main Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 292 Main Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 5 to the report (March 9, 2020) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 3. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. 4. If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board. 5. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property. 6. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 292 Main Street in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a 27-storey tower on the lands known municipally as 276-296 Main Street, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings (update issued April 19, 2019) prepared by Turner Fleischer Architects, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., (issued November 2, 2018, January 25, 2019, November 8, 2019, and February 21, 2020) and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and subject to the following additional conditions: a. That as a condition of the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal's June 26, 2019 Order for PL171473, the owner shall: 1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 292 Main Street in accordance with the plans and drawings (update issued April 19, 2019) prepared by Turner Fleischer Architects and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. (issued November 2, 2018, January 25, 2019, November 8, 2019, and February 21, 2020) and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.a.2 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. 2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. (issued November 2, 2018, January 25, 2019, November 8, 2019, and February 21, 2020) to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 3. Enter into and register on the property at 292 Main Street one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning with such facilities, services and matters to be set forth in the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations. b. That prior to final Site Plan approval for the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council for the property located at 292 Main Street, the owner shall: 1. Provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.a.2 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 2. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect. 3. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 4. Submit a Signage Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 5. Provide full measured drawings and floor plans of both interior and exterior features with photographic documentation keyed to plans. This should include profiles of interior and exterior window framing, baseboards and all other features in addition to complete sections documenting the original/existing construction of the building. 6. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. c. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property 292 Main Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage buildings as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, the owner shall: 1. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.a.2, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 2. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, and approved Interpretation Plan. d. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 6.c.2, the owner shall: 1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 7. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property at 292 Main Street in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 8. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 292 Main Street.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning recommends that: 1. City Council include the property at 292 Main Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register. 2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 292 Main Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 292 Main Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 5 to the report of March 9, 2020 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 3. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. 4. If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board. 5. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property. 6. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 292 Main Street in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a 27-storey tower on the lands known municipally as 276-296 Main Street, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings (update issued April 19, 2019) prepared by Turner Fleischer Architects, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., (issued November 2, 2018, January 25, 2019, November 8, 2019, and March 6, 2020) and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and subject to the following additional conditions: a. That as a condition of the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal's June 26, 2019 Order for PL171473, the owner shall: 1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 292 Main Street in accordance with the plans and drawings (update issued April 19, 2019) prepared by Turner Fleischer Architects and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. (issued November 2, 2018, January 25, 2019, November 8, 2019, and March 6, 2020) and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.a.2 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. 2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. (issued November 2, 2018, January 25, 2019, November 8, 2019, and March 6, 2020) to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 3. Enter into and register on the property at 292 Main Street one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning with such facilities, services and matters to be set forth in the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations. b. That prior to final Site Plan approval for the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council for the property located at 292 Main Street, the owner shall: 1. Provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.a.2 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 2. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect. 3. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager Heritage Planning. 4. Submit a Signage Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 5. Provide full measured drawings and floor plans of both interior and exterior features with photographic documentation keyed to plans. This should include profiles of interior and exterior window framing, baseboards and all other features in addition to complete sections documenting the original/existing construction of the building. 6. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. c. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property 292 Main Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage buildings as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the owner shall: 1. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.a.2, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 2. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, and approved Interpretation Plan. d. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 6.c.2, the owner shall: 1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 7. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property at 292 Main Street in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 8. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 292 Main Street.
PB15.9received
2020 Toronto Heritage Grant Awards
The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of the 2020 Toronto Heritage Grant Program. The Toronto Heritage Grant Selection Committee recommended seventeen grants in 2020 totalling $317,000.00 under the Toronto Heritage Grant Program. The recommended recipients will generate approximately $931,371.00 in private investment for work to conserve irreplaceable cultural heritage resources that contribute to the City's social and economic prosperity by defining our unique sense of place. At its meeting of June 15, 2020, the Planning and Housing Committee recommended that City Council approve the seventeen grant awards for the 2020 Toronto Heritage Grant Program. The Toronto Heritage Grant Program provides matching grant funds for eligible heritage conservation work of residential properties or tax exempt properties in the City of Toronto designated under Part IV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA). Applicants may receive a grant once every five years for up to 50 percent of the cost of eligible conservation work. Owners of house form buildings may receive up to $10,000, or if replacing an entire cedar or slate roof assembly, up to $20,000 every ten years. There is no maximum grant amount for applications for conservation work on non-house form buildings. The properties that have been recommended for a grant award vary in size and location across Toronto. The majority of the grant recipients are residential properties located in Heritage Conservation Districts including several properties within the newly adopted West Annex Phase I Madison Avenue HCD. In addition there are a few notable landmark properties benefitting from heritage grants this year including the Scarborough Bluffs Refreshment Room, Arts and Letters Club, the Feather Factory Lofts, and South Humber Park Pavilion (The Oculus).
The Toronto Preservation Board received the report (June 11, 2020) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, for information.
PB15.10received
Preservation Panel Minutes
The Toronto Preservation Board received the following Minutes, for information: 1. North York Community Preservation Panel from the meeting held on March 23, 2020. 2. North York Community Preservation Panel from the meeting held on April 27, 2020. 3. North York Community Preservation Panel from the meeting held on May 25, 2020.