Toronto and East York Community Council
The full agenda, as filed
All 243 items in the clerk’s order. Each carries the city’s own words: the staff recommendation, what the body decided, and its status. Nothing below is written by us.
Items 51 to 100 of 243Show 2550100all
TE34.51adopted
1684-1702 Queen Street East - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 6-storey mixed-use building. The proposed development will have 90 residential units, and 1,130 square metres of non-residential gross floor area, including conservation of the Imperial Bank of Canada Building at 1702 Queen Street East. One level of underground parking is proposed with 56 vehicular and 91 residential and visitor bicycle parking spaces.
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 1684-1702 Queen Street East, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (June 13, 2022) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to take such actions as are required to implement City Council's decision, including the execution and implementation of appropriate agreements.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 1684-1702 Queen Street East, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (June 13, 2022) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District. 2. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to take such actions as are required to implement City Council's decision, including the execution and implementation of appropriate agreements.
TE34.52forwarded without recommendation
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the heritage properties at 1404 Yonge Street and 1420 Yonge Street (including entrance addresses at 1418, 1422, 1424, 1426 and 1428 Yonge Street) under Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and approve the demolition proposed for the heritage property at 1406 Yonge Street under Part IV, Section 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act in connection with the proposed redevelopment of the site. This report also recommends that City Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for 1404 and 1420 Yonge Street. Located on the west side of Yonge Street just south of St. Clair Avenue within the Deer Park neighbourhood, the properties at 1404-1406 Yonge Street form the end of a row of 3-storey main street commercial buildings that were constructed in 1932 in the Spanish Colonial Revival style. To their immediate north, and separated by a driveway entry into St. Michael's Cemetery, the adjacent 1420 Yonge Street contains a complete block of four, 2-storey main street commercial row buildings that were also constructed in 1932. City Council issued a Notice of Intention to Designate under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act for each of these properties at its meeting on April 6, 2022. In conjunction with an Official Plan Amendment application and a Zoning Bylaw Amendment application, the development proposal is for a 40-storey tower that would encompass the front façade of the heritage building at 1420 Yonge Street, which will be conserved in-situ. The project also proposes the demolition of the building at 1406 Yonge Street, and the repair and conservation of the newly exposed north wall of 1404 Yonge Street. The proposed alterations are consistent with the existing heritage policy framework and the demolition of 1406 Yonge Street is considered acceptable within the broader conservation strategy. The heritage impacts of the development proposal will be appropriately mitigated.
The Toronto and East York Community Council submits the item to City Council without recommendation.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning recommends that: 1. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage properties at 1404 Yonge Street and 1420 Yonge Street (including entrance addresses at 1418, 1422, 1424, 1426 and 1428 Yonge Street), in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a 40-storey tower, with such alterations to be substantially in accordance with architectural drawings dated May 10, 2022, prepared by IBI Group and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by Goldsmith Borgal & Company Ltd. Architects, dated May 3, 2022 and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and subject to the following conditions: a. That the related site-specific Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment permitting the proposed alterations has been enacted by City Council and has come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. b. That the owner: 1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the properties at 1404 Yonge Street and 1420 Yonge Street in accordance with the plans and drawings dated May 10, 2022, prepared by IBI Group and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by Goldsmith Borgal & Company Ltd. Architects, dated May 3, 2022 and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.b.2, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. 2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 1404 Yonge Street and 1420 Yonge Street prepared by Goldsmith Borgal & Company Ltd. Architects, dated May 3, 2022, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 3. Recommendation b.1. and 2. above are required to be satisfied prior to the introduction of the bill for any Zoning By-law Amendment related to the property, unless other legal mechanisms are utilized so as to satisfy the City Solicitor that no Building Permit will be issued until such time as the Owner has entered into the Heritage Easement Agreement and registered the agreement on title. In any case, the Conservation Plan must be accepted and the Heritage Easement Agreement must be entered into and registered no later than December 9, 2022, or such later date as may be agreed by the owner and the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning in writing, failing which this condition will be determined to be unfulfilled. c. That prior to final Site Plan approval for the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment for the properties located at 1406 Yonge Street and 1420 Yonge Street (including entrance addresses at 1418, 1422, 1424, 1426 and 1428 Yonge Street) the owner shall: 1. Provide final Site Plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.b.2 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 2. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect; 3. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage properties will be sensitively illuminated to enhance their heritage features to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 4. Provide a detailed landscape plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 5. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 6. Submit a Signage Plan for the subject property to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. d. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the properties at 1404 Yonge Street and 1420 Yonge Street (including entrance addresses at 1418, 1422, 1424, 1426 and 1428 Yonge Street), including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage buildings as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the owner shall: 1. Have entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City required in Recommendation 1.b.1. 2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.b.2, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upward indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Heritage Lighting Plan and Interpretation Plan. 4. Provide full documentation of the existing heritage properties, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8" x 10" colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a USB flash drive in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. e. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 1.d.3, the owner shall: 1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan, Heritage Lighting Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 2. City Council approve the request to remove the heritage property at 1406 Yonge Street under Section 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a 40-storey tower, with such removal to be undertaken substantially in accordance with architectural drawings dated May 10, 2022, prepared by IBI Group and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by Goldsmith Borgal & Company Ltd. Architects, dated May 3, 2022 and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, subject to the following additional conditions: a. That the related site-specific Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment permitting the proposed removal has been enacted by City Council and has come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning b. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 1406 Yonge Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, the owner shall: 1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the properties at 1404 and 1420 Yonge Street in accordance with the plans and drawings dated May 10, 2022, prepared by IBI Group and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by Goldsmith Borgal & Company Ltd. Architects, dated May 3, 2022 and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.b.2, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. 2. Provide building permit drawings for the development at 1404-1406 Yonge Street and 1420 Yonge Street, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.b.2, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upward indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Heritage Lighting Plan and Interpretation Plan. 4. Provide full documentation of the existing heritage property at 1406 Yonge Street, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8" x 10" colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a flash drive in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; 3. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of 1404 and 1420 Yonge Street (including entrance addresses at 1418, 1422, 1424, 1426 and 1428 Yonge Street) in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 1404 and 1420 Yonge Street (including entrance addresses at 1418, 1422, 1424, 1426 and 1428 Yonge Street).
TE34.53adopted
518 Church Street - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register
This report recommends that City Council include the property at 518 Church Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register for its cultural heritage value. Located on the southwest corner of Church Street and Maitland Street, the property at 518 Church Street comprises a three-storey brick building, originally constructed as part of a row of six residences (508-518 Church Street) in c.1856-1858. It was converted to commercial use by the late-19th century, initially as a grocery and later as a restaurant. The property has evolved physically in its 160-year history, including the loss of the adjacent residential units of the historic row (now a parking lot). The other surviving units are located at 508 and 510 Church Street. Situated within the centre of the Church and Wellesley Village, the subject property is important in defining the area's character. Following research and evaluation, it has been determined that 518 Church Street meets Ontario Regulation 9/06, the criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, which the City of Toronto also applies when evaluating properties for its Heritage Register. The property at 518 Church Street is significant due to its design/physical and contextual value. Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies.
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council include the property at 518 Church Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion), attached as Attachment 3 to the report (May 24, 2022) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning recommends that: 1. City Council include the property at 518 Church Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion), attached as Attachment 3 to the report (May 24, 2022) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.
TE34.54adopted
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the heritage properties at 508 and 510 Church Street (designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act) in connection with the development of the subject site. The development site at 506-516 Church Street contains the Crews and Tangos building at 508 and 510 Church Street, which comprises two adjoining structures, originally constructed as part of a row of six residences in c.1856-1858, along with a surviving nineteenth-century coach house to the rear. The primary structures are a unique example of semi-detached house-form buildings from the mid-nineteenth century that have evolved for commercial use. Since 1994 they have been the home of Crews, later Crews and Tangos, a storied venue for drag performances and queer gatherings. The building is notable for its asymmetrical configuration and details that demonstrate the influence of the Romanesque Revival style. The property is a cultural landmark within the Church and Wellesley Village and for Toronto's broader 2SLGBTQ+ community. The development application proposes a 14-storey mixed-use building, the retention of a portion of the existing Crews and Tangos building at 508 and 510 Church Street and the demolition of the coach house to the rear. The retained portion of the heritage building is proposed to be restored with minor modifications to support ground floor retail uses. The existing World Pride Mural will be removed to allow for masonry restoration and it will be commemorated through documentation and two new murals. The proposed alterations conserve the heritage properties and are consistent with the policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council consent to the application to alter the designated property at 508 and 510 Church Street, with conditions, under Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act for the reasons stated in the report (May 24, 2022) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and with such alterations substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated April 8, 2022, prepared by Diamond Schmitt Architects and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated December 16, 2021 and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, all subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and subject to the following conditions: a. That the related site specific Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment permitting the proposed alterations has been enacted by City Council and has come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. b. That the owner: 1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 508 and 510 Church Street substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated April 8, 2022, prepared by Diamond Schmitt Architects and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated December 16, 2021, subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.b.2 below, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. 2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for the property at 508 and 510 Church Street prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated December 16, 2021, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 3. Recommendation b.1. and 2. above are required to be satisfied prior to the introduction of the bill for any Zoning By-law Amendment related to the property, unless other legal mechanisms are utilized so as to satisfy the City Solicitor that no Building Permit will be issued until such time as the Owner has entered into the Heritage Easement Agreement and registered the agreement on title. In any case, the Conservation Plan must be accepted and the Heritage Easement Agreement must be entered into and registered no later than December 9, 2022, or such later date as may be agreed by the owner and the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning in writing, failing which this condition will be determined to be unfulfilled. c. That prior to Site Plan approval for the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment for the properties located at 508 and 510 Church Street, the subject owner shall: 1. Provide final Site Plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.b.2 above to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 2. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 3. Provide a detailed landscape plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 4. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 5. Submit a Signage Plan for the subject property to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. d. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 508 and 510 Church Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning the owner shall: 1. Have entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City required in Recommendation 1.b.1 above. 2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.b.2 above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upward indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Heritage Lighting Plan and Interpretation Plan. 4. Provide full documentation of the existing Crews and Tangos building and coach house, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8" x 10" colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a USB flash drive in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. e. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 1.d.3 above, the owner shall: 1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan, Heritage Lighting Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 2. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the properties at 508 and 510 Church Street in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the properties at 508 and 510 Church Street.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning recommends that: 1. City Council consent to the application to alter the designated property at 508 and 510 Church Street, with conditions, under Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act for the reasons stated in the report (May 24, 2022) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and with such alterations substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated April 8, 2022, prepared by Diamond Schmitt Architects and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated December 16, 2021 and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and subject to the following conditions: a. That the related site specific Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment permitting the proposed alterations has been enacted by City Council and has come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. b. That the owner: 1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 508 and 510 Church Street substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated April 8, 2022, prepared by Diamond Schmitt Architects and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated December 16, 2021, subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.b.2, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. 2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for the property at 508 and 510 Church Street prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated December 16, 2021, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 3. Recommendation b.1. and 2. above are required to be satisfied prior to the introduction of the bill for any Zoning By-law Amendment related to the property, unless other legal mechanisms are utilized so as to satisfy the City Solicitor that no Building Permit will be issued until such time as the Owner has entered into the Heritage Easement Agreement and registered the agreement on title. In any case, the Conservation Plan must be accepted and the Heritage Easement Agreement must be entered into and registered no later than December 9, 2022, or such later date as may be agreed by the owner and the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning in writing, failing which this condition will be determined to be unfulfilled. c. That prior to Site Plan approval for the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment for the properties located at 508 and 510 Church Street, the subject owner shall: 1. Provide final Site Plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.b.2 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 2. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 3. Provide a detailed landscape plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 4. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 5. Submit a Signage Plan for the subject property to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. d. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 508 and 510 Church Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning the owner shall: 1. Have entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City required in Recommendation 1.b.1. 2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.b.2, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upward indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Heritage Lighting Plan and Interpretation Plan. 4. Provide full documentation of the existing Crews and Tangos building and coach house, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8" x 10" colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a USB flash drive in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. e. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 1.d.3, the owner shall: 1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan, Heritage Lighting Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning. 2. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the properties at 508 and 510 Church Street in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the properties at 508 and 510 Church Street.
TE34.55adopted
2-24 Temple Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report
A Zoning By-law Amendment application was submitted on January 18, 2021 proposing a 16-storey residential building comprised of 273 dwelling units at 2-24 Temple Avenue. The application was deemed complete on February 16, 2021, and has since been revised to include 275 residential units. An associated Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion application was submitted accompanying the Zoning By-law Amendment application regarding the existing rental dwelling units and dwelling rooms. This application is still under review. On September 1, 2021, the applicant notified the City Clerk that an appeal was submitted to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) due to Council not making a decision within the 90-day time frame for the Zoning By-law Amendment as outlined in the Planning Act. This report recommends that the City Solicitor, with the appropriate City staff, attend the OLT hearing to oppose the application in its current form, and to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve outstanding issues. The OLT has scheduled a hearing from September 26, 2022 to October 4, 2022. Mediation sessions were held on May 27, 2022 and June 1, 2022.
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and other appropriate staff, to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing scheduled from September 26, 2022 to October 4, 2022 to oppose the Application for 2-24 Temple Avenue, and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues. 2. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the issuance of any final Orders be withheld until such time as the City Solicitor advises that: a. Draft Zoning By-law Amendments are provided in a form and with content satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; b. The owner has provided confirmation that outstanding issues listed in the Engineering and Construction Services memo to City Planning dated June 7, 2021 have been addressed to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; c. City Council has approved the Rental Housing Demolition application (File No. 21 105909 STE 04 RH) under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 to permit the demolition of the existing rental dwelling units at 2-24 Temple Avenue, and the owner has entered into, and registered on title to the lands, one or more agreements with the City, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, securing all rental housing-related matters, including tenant assistance to address Official Plan policy 3.2.1.12, necessary to implement City Council's decision. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to take such necessary steps, as required, to implement the recommendations above.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and other appropriate staff, to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing scheduled from September 26, 2022 to October 4, 2022 to oppose the Application for 2-24 Temple Avenue, and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues. 2. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the issuance of any final Orders be withheld until such time as the City Solicitor advises that: a. Draft Zoning By-law Amendments are provided in a form and with content satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; b. The owner has provided confirmation that outstanding issues listed in the Engineering and Construction Services memo to City Planning dated June 7, 2021 have been addressed to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; c. City Council has approved the Rental Housing Demolition application (File No. 21 105909 STE 04 RH) under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 to permit the demolition of the existing rental dwelling units at 2-24 Temple Avenue, and the owner has entered into, and registered on title to the lands, one or more agreements with the City, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, securing all rental housing-related matters, including tenant assistance to address Official Plan policy 3.2.1.12, necessary to implement City Council's decision. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to take such necessary steps, as required, to implement City Council's decision.
TE34.56adopted
On November 19, 2020, an Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application was submitted to permit a 13 to 15-storey residential building containing 206 dwelling units. The proposal has since been reduced to an 11 to 13-storey residential building containing 164 dwelling units. A Rental Housing Demolition application was submitted to permit the demolition of 1 rental dwelling unit on the site on February 2, 2021. On February 15, 2022, the applicant appealed the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Land Tribunal ("OLT") due to Council not making a decision within the 120-day time frame of the Planning Act. This report recommends that the City Solicitor, with the appropriate City staff, attend the OLT hearing to oppose the application in its current form, and to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve outstanding issues.
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current application regarding the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment appeals for the lands at 175-195 St. Clair Avenue West and 273 Poplar Plains Road, and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues. 2. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the issuance of any final Orders be withheld until such time as the City Solicitor advises that: a. the final form and content of the draft Official Plan and Zoning By-laws are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; b. the owner has provided confirmation of water, sanitary and stormwater capacity to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, or the determination of whether holding provisions are required in the Zoning By-law Amendment; c. City Council has approved the Rental Housing Demolition Application (21 111463 STE 12 RH) in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, which allows for the demolition of the one (1) existing rental dwelling unit on the site; and d. if applicable, community benefits and other matters in support of the development are secured in a Section 37 Agreement executed by the owner and registered on title to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, if appropriate, to request the issuance of any final Orders prior to the owner entering into a Section 37 Agreement referenced in Recommendation 2.d., above. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement the recommendations above.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current application regarding the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment appeals for the lands at 175-195 St. Clair Avenue West and 273 Poplar Plains Road, and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues. 2. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the issuance of any final Orders be withheld until such time as the City Solicitor advises that: a. the final form and content of the draft Official Plan and Zoning By-laws are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; b. the owner has provided confirmation of water, sanitary and stormwater capacity to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, or the determination of whether holding provisions are required in the Zoning By-law Amendment; c. City Council has approved the Rental Housing Demolition Application (21 111463 STE 12 RH) in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, which allows for the demolition of the one (1) existing rental dwelling unit on the site; d. if applicable, community benefits and other matters in support of the development are secured in a Section 37 Agreement executed by the owner and registered on title to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, if appropriate, to request the issuance of any final Orders prior to the owner entering into a Section 37 Agreement referenced in Recommendation 2.d), above. 4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
TE34.57adopted
On December 31, 2021 a Zoning By-law Amendment application was submitted to permit a 54-storey mixed use building including a 6-storey base building. The application proposes 146 square metres of commercial uses on the ground floor and 549 residential units above. On May 12, 2022, the Applicant appealed the application to the Ontario Land Tribunal ("OLT") due to Council not making a decision within the 90-day time frame prescribed in the Planning Act. This report recommends that the City Solicitor with the appropriate City staff attend the OLT hearing to oppose the application in its current form and to continue discussions with the Applicant to resolve outstanding issues.
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current application regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal for the lands at 15 Charles Street East and 16 Isabella Street and to continue discussions with the Applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues. 2. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the issuance of any final Orders be withheld until such time as the City Solicitor advises that: a. the final form and content of the draft Zoning By-law are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; b. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Parks, Forestry and Recreation as they relate to the required parkland dedication, and setbacks to George Hislop Park, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor; c. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Urban Forestry as they relate to tree planting, soil volume, utility conflicts, tree protection, and Toronto Green Standards, to the satisfaction of the Supervisor, Tree Protection and Plan Review; d. the owner has resolved matters related to roadway widenings and conveyances, as well as matters related to functional servicing and stormwater management, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and e. where applicable community benefits and other matters in support of the development are to be secured in a Section 37 Agreement executed by the owner and registered on title to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor. 3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement the recommendations above.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current application regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal for the lands at 15 Charles Street East and 16 Isabella Street and to continue discussions with the Applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues. 2. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the issuance of any final Orders be withheld until such time as the City Solicitor advises that: a. the final form and content of the draft Zoning By-law are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; b. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Parks, Forestry and Recreation as they relate to the required parkland dedication, and setbacks to George Hislop Park, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor; c. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Urban Forestry as they relate to tree planting, soil volume, utility conflicts, tree protection, and Toronto Green Standards, to the satisfaction of the Supervisor, Tree Protection and Plan Review; d. the owner has resolved matters related to roadway widenings and conveyances, as well as matters related to functional servicing and stormwater management, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and e. where applicable community benefits and other matters in support of the development are to be secured in a Section 37 Agreement executed by the owner and registered on title to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor. 3. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
TE34.58adopted
This report recommends that City Council designate the area referred to as Parkdale Main Street as a Heritage Conservation District ("HCD") and adopt the Parkdale Main Street (the "District") HCD Plan by by-law under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act. The designation of Parkdale Main Street as an HCD and adoption of the HCD Plan will manage change within the District to conserve the area's cultural heritage value through the implementation of contextual policies and guidelines. The study of Parkdale Main Street for designation as an HCD was led by Heritage Planning staff and was initiated in 2015 on Council direction. The Parkdale Main Street HCD Study process and the HCD Plan have been prepared in accordance with provincial legislation and Heritage Conservation Districts in Toronto: Procedures, Policies and Terms of Reference.
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council, in accordance with Section 41 of the Ontario Heritage Act, designate by by-law the area shown on Attachment 1 to the report (May 24, 2022) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, as the Parkdale Main Street Heritage Conservation District. 2. City Council adopt by by-law the Parkdale Main Street Heritage Conservation District Plan as the district plan for the Parkdale Main Street Heritage Conservation District, attached as Attachment 5 to the report (May 24, 2022) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 3. If there are any appeals to the by-law under Section 41 of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with the City's outside counsel and any other appropriate City staff and/or outside consultants to appear before the Ontario Land Tribunal to defend the by-law.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning recommends that: 1. City Council, in accordance with Section 41 of the Ontario Heritage Act, designate by by-law the area shown on Attachment 1 to the report (May 24, 2022) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, as the Parkdale Main Street Heritage Conservation District. 2. City Council adopt by by-law the Parkdale Main Street Heritage Conservation District Plan as the district plan for the Parkdale Main Street Heritage Conservation District, attached as Attachment 5 to the report (May 24, 2022) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 3. If there are any appeals to the by-law under Section 41 of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with the City's outside counsel and any other appropriate City staff and/or outside consultants to appear before the Ontario Land Tribunal to defend the by-law.
TE34.59amended
This report recommends that City Council include 225 properties with cultural heritage value on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register. The properties are good examples of the Main Street Commercial Row, Main Street Commercial Block, Bank, Place of Worship and Theatre typologies that support the historic context of the Danforth Avenue study area. All of the recommended properties meet Ontario Regulation 9/06, the provincial criteria prescribed for municipal designation, which the City also applies when assessing properties for its Heritage Register. The properties were identified through the Danforth Avenue Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment (CHRA), and are located on Danforth Avenue, between the Don Valley and Coxwell Avenue. This report also presents the methodology and results of the Danforth Avenue CHRA including community consultation. The 225 properties that are recommended for inclusion on the Heritage Register in this report reflect building types that define, support, and maintain Danforth Avenue's historic main street character. The collection of historic main street buildings along Danforth Avenue, the vast majority of which were constructed between 1910 and 1929, define an often continuous streetwall of low-rise buildings, articulated by a rhythm of narrow storefronts with recessed entrances, and punctuated by landmark banks, places of worship, and theatres. All of these building types were consistently identified throughout consultations as important to the history of Danforth Avenue, and important to its contemporary identity and sense of place. Within these building types all 225 properties are considered significant heritage resources. The listing of non-designated properties with cultural heritage value on the Heritage Register extends interim protection from demolition and provides an opportunity for City Council to determine whether the property warrants conservation through designation under the Ontario Heritage Act should a development or demolition application be submitted. Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) are required for development applications that affect listed properties.
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council include the following 220 properties on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with the Historic Context and Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion) attached as Attachment 3 to the report (May 24, 2022) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning: 742 Broadview Avenue 744 Broadview Avenue 749 Broadview Avenue 751 Broadview Avenue 750 Broadview Avenue 752 Broadview Avenue 753 Broadview Avenue 114 Danforth Avenue 120 Danforth Avenue 117 Danforth Avenue 119 Danforth Avenue 123 Danforth Avenue 129 Danforth Avenue 124 Danforth Avenue 128 Danforth Avenue 131 Danforth Avenue 135 Danforth Avenue 139 Danforth Avenue 143 Danforth Avenue 132 Danforth Avenue 136 Danforth Avenue 140 Danforth Avenue 146 Danforth Avenue 148 Danforth Avenue 156 Danforth Avenue 162 Danforth Avenue 164 Danforth Avenue 161 Danforth Avenue 165 Danforth Avenue 169 Danforth Avenue 185 Danforth Avenue 189 Danforth Avenue 193 Danforth Avenue 199 Danforth Avenue 201 Danforth Avenue 205 Danforth Avenue 209 Danforth Avenue 237 Danforth Avenue 241 Danforth Avenue 245 Danforth Avenue 249 Danforth Avenue 261 Danforth Avenue 265 Danforth Avenue 269 Danforth Avenue 273 Danforth Avenue 279 Danforth Avenue 281 Danforth Avenue 283 Danforth Avenue 298 Danforth Avenue 300 Danforth Avenue 309 Danforth Avenue 311 Danforth Avenue 315 Danforth Avenue 319 Danforth Avenue 323 Danforth Avenue 327 Danforth Avenue 333 Danforth Avenue 335 Danforth Avenue 337 Danforth Avenue 341 Danforth Avenue 310 Danforth Avenue 345 Danforth Avenue 347 Danforth Avenue 351 Danforth Avenue 353 Danforth Avenue 355 Danforth Avenue 348 Danforth Avenue 359 Danforth Avenue 373 Danforth Avenue 375 Danforth Avenue 439 Danforth Avenue 443 Danforth Avenue 449 Danforth Avenue 440 Danforth Avenue 444 Danforth Avenue 480 Danforth Avenue 481 Danforth Avenue 487 Danforth Avenue 488 Danforth Avenue 490 Danforth Avenue 492 Danforth Avenue 510 Danforth Avenue 516 Danforth Avenue 519 Danforth Avenue 525 Danforth Avenue 526 Danforth Avenue 532 Danforth Avenue 536 Danforth Avenue 529 Danforth Avenue 541 Danforth Avenue 551 Danforth Avenue 557 Danforth Avenue 583 Danforth Avenue 639 Danforth Avenue 641 Danforth Avenue 643 Danforth Avenue 674 Danforth Avenue 676 Danforth Avenue 680 Danforth Avenue 681 Danforth Avenue 702 Danforth Avenue 704 Danforth Avenue 706 Danforth Avenue 708 Danforth Avenue 705 Danforth Avenue 707 Danforth Avenue 709 Danforth Avenue 713 Danforth Avenue 710 Danforth Avenue 744 Danforth Avenue 777 Danforth Avenue 798 Danforth Avenue 801 Danforth Avenue 803 Danforth Avenue 805 Danforth Avenue 807 Danforth Avenue 810 Danforth Avenue 812 Danforth Avenue 818 Danforth Avenue 837 Danforth Avenue 855 Danforth Avenue 859 Danforth Avenue 861 Danforth Avenue 867 Danforth Avenue 862 Danforth Avenue 866 Danforth Avenue 884 Danforth Avenue 886 Danforth Avenue 888 Danforth Avenue 950 Danforth Avenue 954 Danforth Avenue 958 Danforth Avenue 962 Danforth Avenue 966 Danforth Avenue 972 Danforth Avenue 974 Danforth Avenue 980 Danforth Avenue 982 Danforth Avenue 988 Danforth Avenue 990 Danforth Avenue 1000 Danforth Avenue 1002 Danforth Avenue 1008 Danforth Avenue 1010 Danforth Avenue 1014 Danforth Avenue 1020 Danforth Avenue 1022 Danforth Avenue 1028 Danforth Avenue 1015 Danforth Avenue 1096 Danforth Avenue 1098 Danforth Avenue 1104 Danforth Avenue 1106 Danforth Avenue 1158 Danforth Avenue 1160 Danforth Avenue 1162 Danforth Avenue 1164 Danforth Avenue 1166 Danforth Avenue 1170 Danforth Avenue 1174 Danforth Avenue 1180 Danforth Avenue 1182 Danforth Avenue 1190 Danforth Avenue 1194 Danforth Avenue 1232 Danforth Avenue 1236 Danforth Avenue 1238 Danforth Avenue 1242 Danforth Avenue 1246 Danforth Avenue 1252 Danforth Avenue 1254 Danforth Avenue 1258 Danforth Avenue 1260 Danforth Avenue 1262 Danforth Avenue 1266 Danforth Avenue 1268 Danforth Avenue 1316 Danforth Avenue 1318 Danforth Avenue 1328 Danforth Avenue 1330 Danforth Avenue 1336 Danforth Avenue 1331 Danforth Avenue 1333 Danforth Avenue 1335 Danforth Avenue 1337 Danforth Avenue 1347 Danforth Avenue 1351 Danforth Avenue 1355 Danforth Avenue 1359 Danforth Avenue 1365 Danforth Avenue 1367 Danforth Avenue 1416 Danforth Avenue 1426 Danforth Avenue 1428 Danforth Avenue 1430 Danforth Avenue 1432 Danforth Avenue 1434 Danforth Avenue 1436 Danforth Avenue 1442 Danforth Avenue 1446 Danforth Avenue 1450 Danforth Avenue 1458 Danforth Avenue 1464 Danforth Avenue 1468 Danforth Avenue 1472 Danforth Avenue 1474 Danforth Avenue 1506 Danforth Avenue 1516 Danforth Avenue 1520 Danforth Avenue 1524 Danforth Avenue 1526 Danforth Avenue 1528 Danforth Avenue 1550 Danforth Avenue 1552 Danforth Avenue 1556 Danforth Avenue 1562 Danforth Avenue 1564 Danforth Avenue 1568 Danforth Avenue 1573 Danforth Avenue 2. City Council include the following five properties on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion) attached as Attachment 4 to the report (May 24, 2022) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning: 1 Danforth Avenue 5 Donlands Avenue 685 Danforth Avenue 1111 Danforth Avenue 71 Gough Avenue
Staff recommendation as filed
The Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning recommends that: 1. City Council include the following 220 properties on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with the Historic Context and Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion) attached as Attachment 3 to the report (May 24, 2022) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning: 742 Broadview Avenue 744 Broadview Avenue 749 Broadview Avenue 751 Broadview Avenue 750 Broadview Avenue 752 Broadview Avenue 753 Broadview Avenue 114 Danforth Avenue 120 Danforth Avenue 117 Danforth Avenue 119 Danforth Avenue 123 Danforth Avenue 129 Danforth Avenue 124 Danforth Avenue 128 Danforth Avenue 131 Danforth Avenue 135 Danforth Avenue 139 Danforth Avenue 143 Danforth Avenue 132 Danforth Avenue 136 Danforth Avenue 140 Danforth Avenue 146 Danforth Avenue 148 Danforth Avenue 156 Danforth Avenue 162 Danforth Avenue 164 Danforth Avenue 161 Danforth Avenue 165 Danforth Avenue 169 Danforth Avenue 185 Danforth Avenue 189 Danforth Avenue 193 Danforth Avenue 199 Danforth Avenue 201 Danforth Avenue 205 Danforth Avenue 209 Danforth Avenue 237 Danforth Avenue 241 Danforth Avenue 245 Danforth Avenue 249 Danforth Avenue 261 Danforth Avenue 265 Danforth Avenue 269 Danforth Avenue 273 Danforth Avenue 279 Danforth Avenue 281 Danforth Avenue 283 Danforth Avenue 285 Danforth Avenue 298 Danforth Avenue 300 Danforth Avenue 309 Danforth Avenue 311 Danforth Avenue 315 Danforth Avenue 319 Danforth Avenue 323 Danforth Avenue 327 Danforth Avenue 333 Danforth Avenue 335 Danforth Avenue 337 Danforth Avenue 341 Danforth Avenue 310 Danforth Avenue 345 Danforth Avenue 347 Danforth Avenue 351 Danforth Avenue 353 Danforth Avenue 355 Danforth Avenue 348 Danforth Avenue 359 Danforth Avenue 373 Danforth Avenue 375 Danforth Avenue 439 Danforth Avenue 443 Danforth Avenue 449 Danforth Avenue 440 Danforth Avenue 444 Danforth Avenue 480 Danforth Avenue 481 Danforth Avenue 487 Danforth Avenue 488 Danforth Avenue 490 Danforth Avenue 492 Danforth Avenue 510 Danforth Avenue 516 Danforth Avenue 519 Danforth Avenue 525 Danforth Avenue 526 Danforth Avenue 532 Danforth Avenue 536 Danforth Avenue 529 Danforth Avenue 541 Danforth Avenue 551 Danforth Avenue 557 Danforth Avenue 583 Danforth Avenue 639 Danforth Avenue 641 Danforth Avenue 643 Danforth Avenue 674 Danforth Avenue 676 Danforth Avenue 680 Danforth Avenue 681 Danforth Avenue 702 Danforth Avenue 704 Danforth Avenue 706 Danforth Avenue 708 Danforth Avenue 705 Danforth Avenue 707 Danforth Avenue 709 Danforth Avenue 713 Danforth Avenue 710 Danforth Avenue 744 Danforth Avenue 777 Danforth Avenue 798 Danforth Avenue 801 Danforth Avenue 803 Danforth Avenue 805 Danforth Avenue 807 Danforth Avenue 810 Danforth Avenue 812 Danforth Avenue 818 Danforth Avenue 837 Danforth Avenue 855 Danforth Avenue 859 Danforth Avenue 861 Danforth Avenue 867 Danforth Avenue 862 Danforth Avenue 866 Danforth Avenue 884 Danforth Avenue 886 Danforth Avenue 888 Danforth Avenue 950 Danforth Avenue 954 Danforth Avenue 958 Danforth Avenue 962 Danforth Avenue 966 Danforth Avenue 972 Danforth Avenue 974 Danforth Avenue 980 Danforth Avenue 982 Danforth Avenue 988 Danforth Avenue 990 Danforth Avenue 1000 Danforth Avenue 1002 Danforth Avenue 1008 Danforth Avenue 1010 Danforth Avenue 1014 Danforth Avenue 1020 Danforth Avenue 1022 Danforth Avenue 1028 Danforth Avenue 1015 Danforth Avenue 1096 Danforth Avenue 1098 Danforth Avenue 1104 Danforth Avenue 1106 Danforth Avenue 1158 Danforth Avenue 1160 Danforth Avenue 1162 Danforth Avenue 1164 Danforth Avenue 1166 Danforth Avenue 1170 Danforth Avenue 1174 Danforth Avenue 1180 Danforth Avenue 1182 Danforth Avenue 1190 Danforth Avenue 1194 Danforth Avenue 1232 Danforth Avenue 1236 Danforth Avenue 1238 Danforth Avenue 1242 Danforth Avenue 1246 Danforth Avenue 1252 Danforth Avenue 1254 Danforth Avenue 1258 Danforth Avenue 1260 Danforth Avenue 1262 Danforth Avenue 1266 Danforth Avenue 1268 Danforth Avenue 1316 Danforth Avenue 1318 Danforth Avenue 1328 Danforth Avenue 1330 Danforth Avenue 1336 Danforth Avenue 1331 Danforth Avenue 1333 Danforth Avenue 1335 Danforth Avenue 1337 Danforth Avenue 1347 Danforth Avenue 1351 Danforth Avenue 1355 Danforth Avenue 1359 Danforth Avenue 1365 Danforth Avenue 1367 Danforth Avenue 1416 Danforth Avenue 1426 Danforth Avenue 1428 Danforth Avenue 1430 Danforth Avenue 1432 Danforth Avenue 1434 Danforth Avenue 1436 Danforth Avenue 1442 Danforth Avenue 1446 Danforth Avenue 1450 Danforth Avenue 1458 Danforth Avenue 1464 Danforth Avenue 1468 Danforth Avenue 1472 Danforth Avenue 1474 Danforth Avenue 1506 Danforth Avenue 1516 Danforth Avenue 1520 Danforth Avenue 1524 Danforth Avenue 1526 Danforth Avenue 1528 Danforth Avenue 1550 Danforth Avenue 1552 Danforth Avenue 1556 Danforth Avenue 1562 Danforth Avenue 1564 Danforth Avenue 1568 Danforth Avenue 1573 Danforth Avenue 2. City Council include the following five properties on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion) attached as Attachment 4 to the report (May 24, 2022) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning: 1 Danforth Avenue 5 Donlands Avenue 685 Danforth Avenue 1111 Danforth Avenue 71 Gough Avenue
TE34.60amended
Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - Queen Street East Properties
This report recommends that City Council include on the City's Heritage Register six properties located on Queen Street East, east of Woodbine Avenue, in the Beach Neighbourhood. All of the recommended properties meet one or more of the provincial criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest. In recent years Heritage Planning has received a number of community heritage nominations for properties in this neighbourhood. Staff have reviewed all of the nominations and identified that two important collections of properties that merited evaluation would be recommended for inclusion on the Register at this time, with the balance of the nominations to be reviewed in a future phase. The recommended six properties are an important part of the Queen Street East streetscape and include a collection of some of the earliest surviving residential buildings in the neighbourhood, along with a collection of single and double-duplex, residential typology buildings according to designs by Price Brothers that are unique to the Beaches area. The properties being recommended for inclusion on the Heritage Register are contained in Recommendation 1 of this report. All of the recommended properties have been researched and evaluated by staff using the criteria prescribed by the Province in Regulation 9/06 and all of the properties meet one or more of the provincial criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest for designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, which the City applies when assessing properties for inclusion on the City's Heritage Register. The remaining outstanding nominations will be processed systematically along Queen Street East as part of the City's Heritage Survey program or on a case by case basis as the need arises. Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies.
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that: 1. City Council include the following six properties on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with a Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion), attached as Attachment 2 to the report (May 24, 2022) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning: 1897 Queen Street East 1899 Queen Street East 1907 Queen Street East 2241 Queen Street East (including an entrance at 2239 Queen Street East) 2243 Queen Street East (including an entrance at 2235 Queen Street East) 2247 Queen Street East (including entrances at 2249 Queen Street East, and 96 and 98 Hammersmith Avenue) 2. City Council direct the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning to undertake a cultural heritage resource assessment of Price Brothers' housing in the Beach neighbourhood in the area generally bounded by Queen Street East to the Lake, and Maclean Avenue and Leuty Avenue, and to report back with any recommendations for the inclusion of properties on the City's Heritage Register under the Ontario Heritage Act.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning recommends that: 1. City Council include the following six properties on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with a Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion), attached as Attachment 2 to the report, May 24, 2022, from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning: · 1897 Queen Street East · 1899 Queen Street East · 1907 Queen Street East · 2241 Queen Street East (including an entrance at 2239 Queen Street East) · 2243 Queen Street East (including an entrance at 2235 Queen Street East) · 2247 Queen Street East (including entrances at 2249 Queen Street East, and 96 and 98 Hammersmith Avenue)
TE34.61amended
Application for Fence Exemption - 17 Boswell Avenue
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The purpose of this report is to advise Community Council concerning an application by the property owner of 17 Boswell Avenue for a site-specific Fence Exemption, pursuant to Section 447-1.5(B) of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447- Fences. The property owner is seeking Community Council's permission to keep a fence for a pool enclosure above the standards 2.0 metres. This would not comply with the standards stipulated by Section 447-1.2 B. (1).
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Granted the application for an exemption permit to the property owners of 17 Boswell Ave., thereby allowing the proposed fence to be installed. Directed and required that the installation be maintained in good repair without alteration. Directed and required that at such time as replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, Fences, or its successor by-law.
Staff recommendation as filed
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Refuse to grant the application for an exemption permit, by the property owner of 17 Boswell Ave, for a proposed fence that fails to comply with the provisions of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447, Fence By-Law. OR 2. Grant the application for an exemption permit to the property owners of 17 Boswell Ave., thereby allowing the proposed fence to be installed. Direct and require that the installation be maintained in good repair without alteration. Direct and require that at such time as replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, Fences, or its successor by-law.
TE34.62amended
Application for Fence Exemption - 50 Cumberland Street
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The purpose of this report is to consider an application by the property owner of 50 Cumberland St. for a site-specific Fence Exemption, pursuant to Section 447-1.5(B) of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447 - Fences. The property owner is seeking permission to keep a fence for a pool enclosure at the height of 1.2 metres. This pool fence enclosure will be located on the 7th floor of 50 Cumberland St. This would not comply with the standards stipulated by Section 447-1.3 D. Namely, pool on Multi Residential Property is to be a minimum of 1.8 metres in height.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Granted the application for a fence exemption permit to the property owners of 50 Cumberland Street., thereby allowing the proposed fence to be installed. Directed and required that the installation be maintained in good repair without alteration. Directed and required that at such time as replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, Fences, or its successor bylaw.
Staff recommendation as filed
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Refuse to grant the application for an exemption permit, by the property owner of 50 Cumberland St, for a proposed fence that fails to comply with the provisions of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-1.3 D- Fence Bylaw. OR 2. Grant the application for a fence exemption permit to the property owners of 50 Cumberland St., thereby allowing the proposed fence to be installed. Direct and require that the installation be maintained in good repair without alteration. Direct and require that at such time as replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, Fences, or its successor bylaw.
TE34.63amended
Application for Fence Exemption - 408 Roxton Road
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The purpose of this report is to consider an application by the owner(s) of 408 Roxton Road to maintain a wooden fence with a height of 2.4 meters (8 feet) in the rear yard on the north, west, and south side of the property. The fence is for security and privacy. The fence would be in contravention of the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-1.2B (1) Table 1 - Maximum Height of Fences. Based on a complaint, a Notice of Violation was issued on April 21, 2021.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Granted the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 408 Roxton Road, to allow them to maintain the wooden fence with a height of 2.4 meters (8 feet) in the rear yard on the north, west, and south side of the property. Directed and required that the existing fence be maintained in good repair without alteration. Directed and required that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447-Fences, or its successor by-law.
Staff recommendation as filed
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Refuse to grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 408 Roxton Road, to allow them to maintain the wooden fence with a height of 2.4 meters (8 feet) in the rear yard on the north, west, and south side of the property, which does not comply with the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447, Fences, specifically section 447-1.2B (1) Table 1- Maximum Height of Fences. OR 2. Grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 408 Roxton Road, to allow them to maintain the wooden fence with a height of 2.4 meters (8 feet) in the rear yard on the north, west, and south side of the property. Direct and require that the existing fence be maintained in good repair without alteration. Direct and require that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447-Fences, or its successor by-law.
TE34.64amended
Application for Fence Exemption - 99 Broadway Avenue
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The purpose of this report is to advise Community Council concerning an application by the property owner of 99 Broadway Ave. for a site-specific Fence Exemption, pursuant to Section 447-1.5(B) of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447- Fences. The property owner is seeking Community Council's permission to keep a fence for a pool enclosure at the height of 1.2 metres. This pool fence enclosure will be located on the 6th floor podium of 95-99 Broadway Ave. This outdoor terrace is flanked on the north and south by the two condominium towers. The east and west sides has 2.0 metres wind screens. This would not comply with the standards stipulated by Section 447-1.3 D. Namely, Pool fence on Multiple Residential Property is to be at least 1.8 metres in height.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Granted the application for an exemption permit to the property owners of 99 Broadway Ave., thereby allowing the proposed fence to be installed. Directed and required that the installation be maintained in good repair without alteration. Directed and required that at such time as replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, Fences, or its successor by-law.
Staff recommendation as filed
The District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Central District recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Refuse to grant the application for an exemption permit, by the property owner of 99 Broadway Ave, for a proposed fence that fails to comply with the provisions of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-1.3 D- Fence Bylaw. OR 2. Grant the application for an exemption permit to the property owners of 99 Broadway Ave., thereby allowing the proposed fence to be installed. Direct and require that the installation be maintained in good repair without alteration. Direct and require that at such time as replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, Fences, or its successor by-law.
TE34.65amended
Application for Fence Exemption - 103 Sumach Street
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The purpose of this report is to consider an application by the owner(s) of 103 Sumach Street to maintain a wooden fence with a height of 2.4 meters (8 feet) in the rear yard on the north and south side of the property. The fence is on a corner lot and the outside is exposed to Wascana Avenue. The fence was built for security and privacy reasons. The fence would be in contravention of the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-1.2B (1) Table 1 - Maximum Height of Fences. Based on a complaint, a Notice of Violation was issued on June 22, 2021.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Granted the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 103 Sumach Street, to allow them to maintain the wooden fence with a height of 2.4 meters (8 feet) in the rear yard on the north and south side of the property. Directed and required that the existing fence be maintained in good repair without alteration. Directed and required that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447-Fences, or its successor by-law.
Staff recommendation as filed
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Refuse to grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 103 Sumach Street, to allow them to maintain the wooden fence with a height of 2.4 meters (8 feet) in the rear yard on the north and south side of the property, which does not comply with the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447, Fences, specifically section 447-1.2B (1) Table 1- Maximum Height of Fences. OR 2. Grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 103 Sumach Street, to allow them to maintain the wooden fence with a height of 2.4 meters (8 feet) in the rear yard on the north and south side of the property. Direct and require that the existing fence be maintained in good repair without alteration. Direct and require that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447-Fences, or its successor by-law.
TE34.66amended
Application for Fence Exemption - 65 Berkshire Avenue
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The purpose of this report is to consider an application by the owner(s) of 65 Berkshire Avenue to maintain a wooden fence with a height of 2.3 meters (7.5 feet) in the rear yard on the northeast rear of the property. The fence has a length of approximately 3 meters (9.8 feet) and is abutting 67 Berkshire Avenue. The fence consists of pressure treated vertical wood posts. The fence was built for privacy, noise reduction, and light pollution purposes. The fence would be in contravention of the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-1.2B (1) Table 1 - Maximum Height of Fences. Based on a complaint, a Notice of Violation was issued on February 15, 2022.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Granted the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 65 Berkshire Ave, to allow them to maintain the wooden fence with a height of 2.3 meters (7.5 feet) in the rear yard on the northeast property. Directed and required that the existing fence be maintained in good repair without alteration. Directed and required that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447-Fences, or its successor by-law.
Staff recommendation as filed
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Refuse to grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 65 Berkshire Avenue, to allow them to maintain the wooden fence with a height of 2.3 meters (7.5 feet) in the rear yard on the northeast end of the property, which does not comply with the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447, Fences, specifically section 447-1.2B (1) Table 1- Maximum Height of Fences. OR 2. Grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 65 Berkshire Ave, to allow them to maintain the wooden fence with a height of 2.3 meters (7.5 feet) in the rear yard on the northeast property. Direct and require that the existing fence be maintained in good repair without alteration. Direct and require that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447-Fences, or its successor by-law.
TE34.67amended
Application for Fence Exemption - 48 Lankin Boulevard
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The purpose of this report is to advise Community Council concerning an application by the property owner of 48 Lankin Boulevard for a site-specific Fence Exemption, pursuant to Section 447-1.5 (B) of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447- Fences. The property owner is seeking Community Council's permission to keep a fence less than 1.2 Metres horizontally from the water's edge in the pool. This would not comply with the standards stipulated in section 447-1.3. E(1)(a).
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Granted the application for a fence exemption permit (with or without conditions) to the property owners of 48 Lankin Boulevard, thereby allowing the proposed fence to be installed. Directed and required that the installation be maintained in good repair without alteration. Directed and required that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447-Fences, or its successor by-law.
Staff recommendation as filed
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Refuse to grant the application for an exemption permit, by the property owner of 48 Lankin Boulevard, for a proposed fence that fails to comply with the provisions of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-Fences. OR 2. Grant the application for a fence exemption permit (with or without conditions) to the property owners of 48 Lankin Boulevard, thereby allowing the proposed fence to be installed. Direct and require that the installation be maintained in good repair without alteration. Direct and require that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447-Fences, or its successor by-law.
TE34.68amended
Application for Fence Exemption - 77 and 79 Boardwalk Drive
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The purpose of this report is to consider an application by the owner(s) of 77 and 79 Boardwalk Drive to maintain a wooden gate with a height of 2.4 meters (7.8 feet) which exceeds the maximum allowable height of 2.0 meters (6.5 feet) as specified in the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-1.2B (1) Table 1 - Maximum Height of Fences. The fence is in the side yard west of 79 Boardwalk Drive and is between the properties of 77 and 79 Boardwalk Drive. This fence is for security and safety.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Granted the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 77 Boardwalk Drive, to allow them to maintain a wooden gate with a height of 2.4 meters (7.8 feet). Directed and required that the existing fence be maintained in good repair without alteration. Directed and required that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447 Fences, or its successor by-law.
Staff recommendation as filed
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Refuse to grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 77 Boardwalk Drive, to allow them to maintain a wooden gate with a height of 2.4 meters (7.8 feet) , which does not comply with the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447, Fences, specifically section 447-1.2B (1) Table 1 - Maximum Height of Fences OR 2. Grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 77 Boardwalk Drive, to allow them to maintain a wooden gate with a height of 2.4 meters (7.8 feet). Direct and require that the existing fence be maintained in good repair without alteration. Direct and require that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447 Fences, or its successor by-law.
TE34.69amended
Application for Fence Exemption - 77 and 79 Boardwalk Drive
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The purpose of this report is to consider an application by the owner(s) of 77 and 79 Boardwalk Drive to maintain a wooden gate with a height of 2.4 meters (7.8 feet) which exceeds the maximum allowable height of 2.0 meters (6.5 feet) as specified in the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-1.2B (1) Table 1 - Maximum Height of Fences. The fence is in the side yard east of 77 Boardwalk Drive and is between the properties of 77 and 79 Boardwalk Drive. This fence is for security and safety.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Granted the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 79 Boardwalk Drive, to allow them to maintain a wooden gate with a height of 2.4 meters (7.8 feet). Directed and required that the existing fence be maintained in good repair without alteration. Direct and require that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447 Fences, or its successor by-law.
Staff recommendation as filed
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Refuse to grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 79 Boardwalk Drive, to allow them to maintain a wooden gate with a height of 2.4 meters (7.8 feet) , which does not comply with the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447, Fences, specifically section 447-1.2B (1) Table 1 - Maximum Height of Fences OR 2. Grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 79 Boardwalk Drive, to allow them to maintain a wooden gate with a height of 2.4 meters (7.8 feet). Direct and require that the existing fence be maintained in good repair without alteration. Direct and require that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447 Fences, or its successor by-law.
TE34.70amended
Application for Fence Exemption - 46 Ferris Road
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The purpose of this report is to consider an application by the owner(s) of 46 Ferris Road to maintain a fence of vinyl horizontal boards in the rear yard on the east side of the property that measures 1.8 meters (5.9 feet) high. The fence is part of a pool enclosure and vinyl was used for aesthetics. The Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-1.2A (5)-Restrictions on fences states that every fence that uses materials not usually intended for use in permanent fencing, unless specifically permitted by this chapter or another by-law. Based on a complaint, a Notice of Violation was issued on March 11, 2021.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Granted the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 46 Ferris Road, to allow them to maintain a vinyl fence in the rear yard on the east side of the property that measures 1.8 meters (5.9 feet). Directed and required that the existing fence be maintained in good repair without alteration. Directed and required that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447-Fences, or its successor by-law.
Staff recommendation as filed
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Refuse to grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 46 Ferris Road, to maintain a vinyl fence in the rear yard on the east side of the property that measures 1.8 meters (5.9 feet) which does not comply with the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447, Fences, specifically section 447-1.2A (5)-Restrictions on fences. OR 2. Grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 46 Ferris Road, to allow them to maintain a vinyl fence in the rear yard on the east side of the property that measures 1.8 meters (5.9 feet). Direct and require that the existing fence be maintained in good repair without alteration. Direct and require that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447-Fences, or its successor by-law.
TE34.71amended
Application for Fence Exemption - 245 Holborne Avenue
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The purpose of this report is to consider an application by the owner(s) of 245 Holborne Avenue to build a wooden fence with a height of 2.4 meters (8 feet) and a length of 19.8 meters (65 feet) in the rear yard on the east property. This fence would be installed between 245 Holborne Avenue and 284 Gledhill Avenue. The fence would be built for privacy. The fence would be in contravention of the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-1.2B (1) Table 1 - Maximum Height of Fences.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Granted the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 245 Holborne Avenue, to allow them to erect a wooden fence with a height of 2.4 meters (8 feet) in the rear yard on the east property. Directed and required that the existing fence be maintained in good repair without alteration. Directed and required that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447 Fences, or its successor by-law.
Staff recommendation as filed
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Refuse to grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 245 Holborne Avenue, to allow them to erect a wooden fence with a height of 2.4 meters (8 feet) in the rear yard on the east property, which does not comply with the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447, Fences, specifically section 447-1.2B (1) Table 1- Maximum Height of Fences. OR 2. Grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 245 Holborne Avenue, to allow them to erect a wooden fence with a height of 2.4 meters (8 feet) in the rear yard on the east property. Direct and require that the existing fence be maintained in good repair without alteration. Direct and require that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447 Fences, or its successor by-law.
TE34.72amended
Application for Fence Exemption - 59 Kimberley Avenue
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The purpose of this report is to consider an application by the owner(s) of 59 Kimberley Avenue to maintain a wooden lattice fence with a height of 2.4 meters (7.8 feet) in the rear yard on the north side of the property. The fence has a length of approximately 2.1 meters (7 feet). The fence is for safety. The fence would be in contravention of the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-1.2B (1) Table 1 - Maximum Height of Fences. Based on a complaint, a Notice of Violation was issued on June 3, 2021.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Granted the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 59 Kimberley Avenue to maintain a wooden lattice fence with a height of 2.4 meters (7.8 feet) in the rear yard on the north side of the property. Directed and required that the existing fence be maintained in good repair without alteration. Directed and required that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447-Fences, or its successor by-law.
Staff recommendation as filed
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Refuse to grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 59 Kimberley Avenue to maintain a wooden lattice fence with a height of 2.4 meters (7.8 feet) in the rear yard on the north side of the property, which does not comply with the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447, Fences, specifically section 447-1.2B (1) Table 1- Maximum Height of Fences. OR 2. Grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 59 Kimberley Avenue to maintain a wooden lattice fence with a height of 2.4 meters (7.8 feet) in the rear yard on the north side of the property. Direct and require that the existing fence be maintained in good repair without alteration. Direct and require that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447-Fences, or its successor by-law.
TE34.73amended
Application for Fence Exemption - 7 Ralston Avenue
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. The purpose of this report is to consider an application by the owner(s) of 7 Ralston Avenue to maintain a wrought iron gate in the rear yard that measures 1.4 meter (4.7 feet) and has a wrought iron horizontal bar that provides a 1.2 meter (4 feet) distance from the horizontal bar to the locking mechanism. The wrought iron spindles means moving the latch to the pool-side of the gate is not an ideal solution. Replacing the gate with a solid panel would raise a security concern. The Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447-1.3C (6.C.1) - Access Protection states that every gate in a swimming pool enclosure shall be self-closing and equipped with a lockable, self-latching device located on the inside near the top of the gate or on the outside at least 1.5 meters above grade.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Granted the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 7 Ralston Avenue, to maintain a wrought iron gate in the rear yard that measures 1.4 meters (4.7 feet) and has a wrought iron horizontal bar that provides a 1.2 meter (4 feet) distance from the horizontal bar to the locking mechanism. Directed and required that the existing fence be maintained in good repair without alteration. Directed and required that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447 Fences, or its successor by-law.
Staff recommendation as filed
Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Refuse to grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 7 Ralston Avenue, to maintain a wrought iron gate in the rear yard that measures 1.4 meters (4.7 feet) and has a wrought iron horizontal bar that provides a 1.2 meter (4 feet) distance from the horizontal bar to the locking mechanism, which does not comply with the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447, Fences, specifically section 447-1.3C (6.C.1) - Access Protection. OR 2. Grant the application for an exemption permit, by the owner(s) of 7 Ralston Avenue, to maintain a wrought iron gate in the rear yard that measures 1.4 meters (4.7 feet) and has a wrought iron horizontal bar that provides a 1.2 meter (4 feet) distance from the horizontal bar to the locking mechanism. Direct and require that the existing fence be maintained in good repair without alteration. Direct and require that at such time as a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447 Fences, or its successor by-law.
TE34.74withdrawn
Application to Remove a Private Tree - 11 Earnbridge Street
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. This report requests that Toronto and East York Community Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 11 Earnbridge Street. The application indicates the reason for removal is due to a conflict with the proposed construction of a swimming pool. The subject tree is a honey locust tree (Gleditsia triacanthos), measuring 38 cm in diameter. The Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.
The Item was Withdrawn from the agenda.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Acting Director of Urban Forestry recommends that: 1. Toronto and East York Community Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 11 Earnbridge Street.
TE34.75adopted
Application to Remove a Private Tree - 57 Alcorn Avenue
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. This report requests that Toronto and East York Community Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 57 Alcorn Avenue. The application indicates the reason for removal is due to concerns that the falling nuts are causing damage to the property and pose a significant risk of injury to people in the vicinity. The subject tree is a black walnut tree (Juglans nigra), measuring 93 cm in diameter. The Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Denied the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 57 Alcorn Avenue.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Acting Director of Urban Forestry recommends that: 1. Toronto and East York Community Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 57 Alcorn Avenue.
TE34.76adopted
Application to Remove a Private Tree - 49 Sumach Street
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. This report requests that Toronto and East York Community Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 49 Sumach Street. The application indicates the reason for removal is due to the replacement of an existing pool, concerns over falling fruit that produced a foul smell, attracted wildlife, and may be poisonous to children and dogs. The subject tree is a ginkgo tree (Ginkgo biloba) measuring 73 cm in diameter. The Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Denied the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 49 Sumach Street.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Acting Director of Urban Forestry recommends that: 1. Toronto and East York Community Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 49 Sumach Street.
TE34.77adopted
Application to Remove a Private Tree - 426 Plains Road
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. This report requests that Toronto and East York Community Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located on the boundary line between the properties of 426 and 428 Plains Road. The application indicates that the reason for removal is due to concerns that the tree's pollen is causing allergic reactions; it drops seed fluff and sticky pods; has caused property damage by dropping branches, and by the roots heaving and cracking the garage foundation. The subject tree is an eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides) measuring 77 cm in diameter. The Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Denied the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located on the boundary line between the properties of 426 and 428 Plains Road.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Acting Director of Urban Forestry recommends that: 1. Toronto and East York Community Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located on the boundary line between the properties of 426 and 428 Plains Road.
TE34.78amended
Residential Demolition Applications - 1 and 3 Close Avenue
This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision. In accordance with Section 33 of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Ch. 363, Article 6 "Demolition Control," the applications for the demolition of two existing 2.5-storey semi-detached dwellings at 1 and 3 Close Avenue (Application Nos. 22 130199 DEM 00 DM and 22 130324 DEM 00 DM) are being referred to the Toronto and East York Community Council for consideration to refuse or grant the application, including any conditions, if any, to be attached to the permit applications because a building permit has not been issued for a replacement building and because Toronto Building received a written objection.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. City Council approve the applications to demolish the existing residential buildings at 1 and 3 Close Avenue subject to the following conditions: a. The owner shall apply for, and receive approval of, a Rental Housing Demolition permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 to permit the demolition of the four (4) existing rental dwelling units at 1 and 3 Close Avenue; b. That construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official; c. That all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition; d. That sod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, paragraph B and 629-11; and e. That any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill. 2. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of a future Rental Housing Demolition Permit, as required in Recommendation 1.a. above, for the demolition of the four (4) existing rental dwelling units at 1 and 3 Close Avenue subject to the following: a. The owner shall provide and maintain replacement rental dwelling units having a minimum total gross floor area of 545 square metres to replace the four (4) existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished at 1 and 3 Close Avenue as part of any future development on any of the lands at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 17 Close Avenue, 74 and 78 Springhurst Avenue, and 74 and 82 Dunn Avenue (the "Lands") for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental unit is first occupied. During such 20-year period, no replacement rental unit shall be registered as a condominium or any other form of ownership housing that provides a right to exclusive possession of a dwelling unit, including life-lease or co-ownership, and no application shall be made to demolish any replacement rental unit or convert any replacement rental unit to a non-residential rental purpose. The location, unit mix, and unit sizes of the replacement rental units shall be determined as part of the application review process for any future planning application for the Lands, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; b. The owner shall provide and maintain the replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 2.a. above at rents that are no higher than one (1) times the average rent for the same bedroom type in the City of Toronto, as reported by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation in its most recent Rental Market Survey, for a period of at least 10 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of each replacement rental unit, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and c. The owner shall enter into, and register on title to the Lands, one or more agreement(s), including, if necessary, an agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendations 2.a. and 2.b. above, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 3. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue a future Rental Housing Demolition Permit, as required in Recommendation 1.a above and subject to the conditions in Recommendations 2.a. through 2.c. above, for the demolition of the four (4) existing rental dwelling units at 1 and 3 Close Avenue after all of the following have occurred: a. the conditions in Recommendations 2.a. and 2.b. above has been secured though the agreement(s) required in Recommendation 2.c above; and b. the Zoning By-law Amendments for 74, 82, 130, 150, 160, and 162 Dunn Avenue, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 17 Close Avenue, 74 and 78 Springhurst Avenue, as approved in principle by City Council at its meeting of October 27, 28, and 30, 2020, have come into full force and effect. 4. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a permit to demolish the two 2.5-storey semi-detached houses pursuant to Section 33 of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 6 "Demolition Control" after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 3 above.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Director and Deputy Chief Building Official, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council give consideration to the demolition application for 1 and 3 Close Avenue, and decide to: 1. Refuse the applications to demolish the two 2.5-storey semi-detached dwellings because there is no permit to replace the building on the site at this time; or 2. Approve the applications to demolish the two 2.5-storey semi-detached dwellings without any conditions; or 3. Approve the applications to demolish the two 2.5-storey semi-detached dwellings with the following conditions: a. That construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official; b. That all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition; c. That sod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, paragraph B and 629-11; and d. That any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.
TE34.79amended
Residential Demolition Application - 70 Soudan Avenue
This staff report is regarding a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision. In accordance with city-wide residential demolition control under the Toronto Municipal Code Ch.363, under the authority of Section 33 of the Planning Act, the application for the demolition of half of an existing 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling at 70 Soudan Avenue (Application No. 22 144221 DEM 00 DM) is being referred to the Toronto and East York Community Council for consideration to refuse or grant the application, including any conditions, if any, to be attached to the permit application because a building permit has not been issued for a replacement building.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Approved the application to demolish half of the existing 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling with the following conditions: a. That construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official; b. That all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition; c. That sod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, paragraph B and 629- 11; d. That any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Director and Deputy Chief Building Official, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council give consideration to the demolition application and decide to: 1. Refuse the application to demolish half of the existing of the 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling because there is no permit to replace the building on the site at this time; or 2. Approve the application to demolish half of the existing 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling without any conditions; or 3. Approve the application to demolish half of the existing 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling with the following conditions: a. That construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official; b. That all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition; c. That sod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, paragraph B and 629- 11; d. That any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.
TE34.80amended
Residential Demolition Application - 72 Soudan Avenue
This staff report is regarding a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision. In accordance with city-wide residential demolition control under the Toronto Municipal Code Ch.363, under the authority of Section 33 of the Planning Act, the application for the demolition of half of an existing 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling at 72 Soudan Avenue (Application No. 22 144228 DEM 00 DM) is being referred to the Toronto and East York Community Council for consideration to refuse or grant the application, including any conditions, if any, to be attached to the permit application because a building permit has not been issued for a replacement building.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Refused the application to demolish half of the existing of the 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling because there is no permit to replace the building on the site at this time; or 2. Approved the application to demolish half of the existing 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling without any conditions; or 3. Approved the application to demolish half of the existing 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling with the following conditions: a. That construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official; b. That all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition; c. That sod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, paragraph B and 629- 11; d. That any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Director and Deputy Chief Building Official, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council give consideration to the demolition application and decide to: 1. Refuse the application to demolish half of the existing of the 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling because there is no permit to replace the building on the site at this time; or 2. Approve the application to demolish half of the existing 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling without any conditions; or 3. Approve the application to demolish half of the existing 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling with the following conditions: a. That construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official; b. That all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition; c. That sod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, paragraph B and 629- 11; d. That any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.
TE34.81amended
Residential Demolition Application - 74 Soudan Avenue
This staff report is regarding a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision. In accordance with city-wide residential demolition control under the Toronto Municipal Code Ch.363, under the authority of Section 33 of the Planning Act, the application for the demolition of half of an existing 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling at 74 Soudan Avenue (Application No. 22 144232 DEM 00 DM) is being referred to the Toronto and East York Community Council for consideration to refuse or grant the application, including any conditions, if any, to be attached to the permit application because a building permit has not been issued for a replacement building.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Approved the application to demolish half of the existing 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling with the following conditions: a. That construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official; b. That all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition; c. That sod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, paragraph B and 629- 11; and d. That any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Director and Deputy Chief Building Official, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council give consideration to the demolition application and decide to: 1. Refuse the application to demolish half of the existing of the 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling because there is no permit to replace the building on the site at this time; or 2. Approve the application to demolish half of the existing 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling without any conditions; or 3. Approve the application to demolish half of the existing 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling with the following conditions: a. That construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official; b. That all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition; c. That sod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, paragraph B and 629- 11; and d. That any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.
TE34.82amended
Residential Demolition Application - 76 Soudan Avenue
This staff report is regarding a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision. In accordance with city-wide residential demolition control under the Toronto Municipal Code Ch.363, under the authority of Section 33 of the Planning Act, the application for the demolition of half of an existing 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling at 76 Soudan Avenue (Application No. 22 144233 DEM 00 DM) is being referred to the Toronto and East York Community Council for consideration to refuse or grant the application, including any conditions, if any, to be attached to the permit application because a building permit has not been issued for a replacement building.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Refused the application to demolish half of the existing of the 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling because there is no permit to replace the building on the site at this time; or 2. Approved the application to demolish half of the existing 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling without any conditions; or 3. Approved the application to demolish half of the existing 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling with the following conditions: a. That construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official; b. That all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition; c. That sod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, paragraph B and 629- 11; and d. That any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Director and Deputy Chief Building Official, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District recommends that the Toronto and East York Community Council give consideration to the demolition application and decide to: 1. Refuse the application to demolish half of the existing of the 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling because there is no permit to replace the building on the site at this time; or 2. Approve the application to demolish half of the existing 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling without any conditions; or 3. Approve the application to demolish half of the existing 2-storey semi-detached single family dwelling with the following conditions: a. That construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official; b. That all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition; c. That sod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, paragraph B and 629- 11; and d. That any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.
TE34.83adopted
Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 275 Albany Avenue
To obtain Toronto and East York Community Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law, to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended. Fire Services use designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of the spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Designated that part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services, in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as fire routes pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 275 Albany Avenue. 2. Authorized the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services and the City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Fire Chief and General Manager, recommends that: 1. Toronto and East York Community Council designate that part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief, in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as fire routes pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 275 Albany Avenue. 2. Toronto and East York Community Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.
TE34.84adopted
Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 181 Bedford Road
To obtain Toronto and East York Community Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law, to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended. Fire Services use designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of the spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Designated that part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services, in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as fire routes pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 181 Bedford Road. 2. Authorized the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services and the City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Fire Chief and General Manager, recommends that: 1. Toronto and East York Community Council designate that part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief, in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as fire routes pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 181 Bedford Road. 2. Toronto and East York Community Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.
TE34.85adopted
Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 250 Davenport Road
To obtain Toronto and East York Community Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law, to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended. Fire Services use designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of the spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Designated that part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services, in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as fire routes pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 250 Davenport Road. 2. Authorized the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services and the City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Fire Chief and General Manager, recommends that: 1. Toronto and East York Community Council designate that part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief, in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as fire routes pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 250 Davenport Road. 2. Toronto and East York Community Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.
TE34.86adopted
Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 101 St. Clair Avenue West
To obtain Toronto and East York Community Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law, to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended. Fire Services use designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of the spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Designated that part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services, in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as fire routes pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 101 St. Clair Avenue West. 2. Authorized the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services, and the City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.
Staff recommendation as filed
The Fire Chief and General Manager, recommends that: 1. Toronto and East York Community Council designate that part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief, in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as fire routes pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 101 St. Clair Avenue West. 2. Toronto and East York Community Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.
TE34.87amended
This report provides information and identifies a preliminary set of issues regarding the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a total of 2,966 dwelling units and 24,216 square metres of non-residential gross floor area in 8 buildings ranging from 18 to 48-storeys. The proposal represents an approximate 30 percent increase of height and residential gross floor area across Blocks 1 to 4. Staff are currently reviewing the application. It has been circulated to all appropriate agencies and City divisions for comment. Staff will proceed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the application with the Ward Councillor.
The Toronto and East York Community Council directed: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands pertaining to 1245 Dupont Street, 1260 Dufferin Street, 213 Emerson Avenue, together with the Ward Councillor as soon as possible in the new term of Council: a. if hosted in-person, includes the provision of light refreshments and, when required, childcare and accessibility resources including sign language interpretation at the sole cost of the applicant. b. if hosted virtually, includes the provision of accessibility resources including closed captioning and, upon request, sign language interpretation at the sole cost of the applicant. The meeting notice should clearly articulate who community members should contact to access these resources. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 240 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant. 3. Staff conduct strategic outreach with various community stakeholders including but not limited to the local residents' association and business improvement area associations prior to the community consultation meeting, should time permit.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the application located at 1245 Dupont Street, 1260 Dufferin Street, and 213 Emerson Avenue together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
TE34.88adopted
307 Lake Shore Boulevard East - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report
This report provides information and identifies a preliminary set of issues regarding the application at 307 Lake Shore Boulevard East, for a 49-storey mixed-use building with 430 residential units. Staff do not support this proposal as currently submitted. The proposal requires revision to reflect the area's development framework, and to implement planned coordination with the adjacent emerging Quayside development. Staff are currently reviewing the application. It has been circulated to all appropriate agencies and City divisions for comment, including Waterfront Toronto. Staff will proceed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the application with the Ward Councillor.
The Toronto and East York Community Council directed: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the applications located at 307 Lake Shore Boulevard East together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the applications located at 307 Lake Shore Boulevard East together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
TE34.89adopted
470R Lake Shore Boulevard West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report
This report provides information and identifies a preliminary set of issues regarding the application for a retail development of 5,509 square metres under the Gardiner Expressway at 470R Lake Shore Boulevard West. Staff are currently reviewing the application. It has been circulated to all appropriate agencies and City divisions for comment. Staff will proceed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the application with the Ward Councillor.
The Toronto and East York Community Council directed: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the application located at 470R Lake Shore Boulevard West together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the application located at 470R Lake Shore Boulevard West together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
TE34.90adopted
This report provides information and identifies a preliminary set of issues for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications for the property located at 219-221 Roxton Road proposing a 6-storey (24.9 metres, including the mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building containing retail and residential uses. The proposal includes 17 rental dwelling units. Staff are currently reviewing the application. It has been circulated to all appropriate agencies and City divisions for comment. Staff will proceed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the application with the Ward Councillor.
The Toronto and East York Community Council directed: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the application located at 219-221 Roxton Road together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the application located at 219-221 Roxton Road together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
TE34.91adopted
This report provides information and identifies a preliminary set of issues regarding the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to demolish the existing buildings on site and allow for the construction of a 19-storey mixed-use building, containing 143 residential dwelling units and 1,569 square metres of non-residential gross floor area. Staff are currently reviewing the application. It has been circulated to all appropriate agencies and City divisions for comment. City Planning staff will proceed to schedule a Community Consultation Meeting for the application with the Ward Councillor.
The Toronto and East York Community Council directed: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the application pertaining to 1087-1091 Yonge Street and 9 Price Street together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the application pertaining to 1087-1091 Yonge Street and 9 Price Street together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
TE34.92adopted
1255-1311 Yonge - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report
This report provides information and identifies a preliminary set of issues regarding the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to allow for the construction of an 11-storey (40-metre excluding the mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building, containing 102 residential dwelling units and 5,000 square metres of non-residential gross floor area (including 3,885.9 square metres of office uses). Staff are currently reviewing the application. It has been circulated to all appropriate agencies and City divisions for comment. Together with the Ward Councillor, City Planning staff have scheduled a Community Consultation Meeting for June 13, 2022.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Endorsed the arrangements made between City Planning staff and the applicant: notice for the June 13, 2022, Community Consultation Meeting to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners as was determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. Toronto and East York Community Council endorse the arrangements made between City Planning staff and the applicant to give notice for the June 13, 2022, Community Consultation Meeting to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners as was determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
TE34.93adopted
This report provides information and identifies a preliminary set of issues regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment application for the development of ten 4-storey back-to-back townhouses at 73-79 Ardmore Road (formerly 1647 Bathurst Street). The application has been circulated to all appropriate City divisions and public agencies for comment. City Planning staff will proceed to schedule a Community Consultation Meeting for the application, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
The Toronto and East York Community Council directed: 1. City Planning staff schedule a Community Consultation Meeting for the application pertaining to 73-79 Ardmore Road (formally 1647 Bathurst Street), together with the Ward Councillor; and 2. Notice for the Community Consultation Meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Planning staff schedule a Community Consultation Meeting for the application pertaining to 73-79 Ardmore Road (formally 1647 Bathurst Street), together with the Ward Councillor; and 2. Notice for the Community Consultation Meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
TE34.94adopted
This report provides information and identifies a preliminary set of issues regarding two separate applications, with the same owner, to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law at 500 Macpherson Avenue and 555 Davenport Road. Both applications propose an 8-storey residential building. The applications have been circulated to all appropriate City divisions and public agencies for comment. City Planning staff will proceed to schedule a Community Consultation Meeting for the two applications, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
The Toronto and East York Community Council directed: 1. Staff schedule a Community Consultation Meeting for the applications pertaining to 500 Macpherson Avenue and 555 Davenport Road, together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the Community Consultation Meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application sites, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Planning staff schedule a Community Consultation Meeting for the applications pertaining to 500 Macpherson Avenue and 555 Davenport Road, together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the Community Consultation Meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application sites, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
TE34.95adopted
214-224 Merton Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment - Preliminary Report
This report provides information and identifies a preliminary set of issues regarding the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a 35-storey mixed-use building, containing 346 residential dwelling units and 452.7 square metres of non-residential gross floor area as well as a 371.3 square metre off-site park at 6A and 6B Merton Street. Staff are currently reviewing the application. It has been circulated to all appropriate agencies and City divisions for comment. City Planning staff will proceed to schedule a Community Consultation Meeting for the application with the Ward Councillor.
The Toronto and East York Community Council directed: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the applications pertaining to 214-224 Merton Street together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the applications pertaining to 214-224 Merton together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
TE34.96adopted
This report provides information and identifies a preliminary set of issues regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition applications submitted for the lands at 77 Roehampton Avenue. The proposal is to demolish the existing building on site and allow for the construction of a 50-storey residential building, containing 623 residential dwelling units of which, 81 are rental replacement dwelling units. Staff are currently reviewing the applications. It has been circulated to all appropriate agencies and City divisions for comment. City Planning staff will proceed to schedule a Community Consultation Meeting for the application with the Ward Councillor.
The Toronto and East York Community Council directed: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the applications pertaining to 77 Roehampton Avenue together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the applications pertaining to 77 Roehampton together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
TE34.97amended
This report provides information and identifies a preliminary set of issues regarding the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Rental Housing Demolition applications located at 239-255 Dundas Street East. The applications propose to permit a 49-storey (159 metre excluding the mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building containing 678 residential dwelling units and 120 square metres of ground-floor retail. The existing buildings on the site contain 8 residential rental dwelling units which would be demolished to accommodate the redevelopment of the site. The subject site is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act as part of the Garden District Heritage Conservation District. The applicant is proposing partial retention of the existing heritage buildings. Staff are currently reviewing the applications. City staff are not supportive of the proposal in its current form. The applications have been circulated to all appropriate agencies and City divisions for comment. Staff will proceed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the applications with the Ward Councillor.
The Toronto and East York Community Council directed: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands pertaining to 239 - 255 Dundas Street East, which includes the provision of accessibility resources including closed captioning and, upon request, sign language interpretation at the sole cost of the applicant, in consultation with the Ward Councillor. The meeting notice should clearly articulate who community members should contact to access these resources. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant. 3. The Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and the applicant, in consultation with City Planning, Transportation Services, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and any other necessary City officials, to create a working group and to consult with the local community as part of the Site Plan process, including the local residents association, Business Improvement Area, and other stakeholders, on the following prior to the issuance of Final Site Plan Approval pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act: a construction and traffic management plan, landscape and public realm plans, building materials and lighting, and other issues as identified in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the application located at 239-255 Dundas Street East together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
TE34.98amended
This report provides information and identifies a preliminary set of issues for the Zoning By-law Amendment application located at 495 Front Street East for a mixed use building ranging in height from 7 to 13-storeys, with a 31-storey tower located at the south-west corner of the site. The proposal includes 279 parking spaces and 898 bicycle parking spaces. Staff are currently reviewing the application, which has been circulated to all appropriate agencies and City divisions for comment. Staff will proceed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the application with the Ward Councillor.
The Toronto and East York Community Council directed: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands pertaining to 495 Front Street East, which includes the provision of accessibility resources including closed captioning and, upon request, sign language interpretation at the sole cost of the applicant, in consultation with the Ward Councillor. The meeting notice should clearly articulate who community members should contact to access these resources. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant. 3. The Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and the applicant, in consultation with City Planning, Transportation Services, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and any other necessary City officials, to create a working group and to consult with the local community as part of the Site Plan process, including the local residents association, Business Improvement Area, and other stakeholders, on the following prior to the issuance of Final Site Plan Approval pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act: a construction and traffic management plan, landscape and public realm plans, building materials and lighting, and other issues as identified in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the application located at 495 Front Street East together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
TE34.99adopted
This report provides information and identifies a preliminary set of issues regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition applications submitted for 325 Gerrard Street East for Phases 4 and 5 of the Regent Park revitalization. The site is currently occupied by a mix of apartment buildings and townhouses and contains 527 social housing units. The applications propose to demolish the existing buildings, with the exception of the Boiler House building, and redevelop the site with 12 new buildings with heights ranging from 4 to 38 storeys. The new buildings would contain 2,973 residential units, of which 1,181 will be social housing units, including 633 social housing replacement units, owned and operated by Toronto Community Housing. A total of 13,721 square metres of retail and community space is also proposed for the site. Staff are currently reviewing the applications, which have been circulated to all appropriate agencies and City divisions for comment. Together with the Ward Councillor, City Planning staff scheduled a Community Consultation Meeting for the applications, which was held on June 9, 2022.
The Toronto and East York Community Council: 1. Endorsed the arrangements made between City Planning staff and the applicant: notice for the June 9, 2022 Community Consultation Meeting to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners as was determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. Toronto and East York Community Council endorse the arrangements made between City Planning staff and the applicant to give notice for the June 9, 2022 Community Consultation Meeting to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners as was determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.
TE34.100amended
1761-1763 Dundas Street East - Zoning By-law Amendment - Preliminary Report
This report provides information and identifies a preliminary set of issues regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment application for a four-storey residential building with 23 dwelling units. Staff are currently reviewing the application. The application has been circulated to all appropriate agencies and City divisions for comment. Staff will proceed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the application, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
The Toronto and East York Community Council directed: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the application located at 1761-1763 Dundas Street East together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 meters of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant. 3. Planning Staff to circulate the application to the Housing Secretariat. 4. Planning staff pursue the inclusion of long-term affordable housing units that will be provided within the proposed development and include the number and size of the affordable units in the final report from City Planning.
Staff recommendation as filed
The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the application located at 1761-1763 Dundas Street East together with the Ward Councillor. 2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 meters of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.