The Public GalleryToronto

Toronto City Council · 2019-11-26 · 2019.CC12.9

The filed record

162 Queens Quay East - East Bayfront - Zoning By-law Amendment - Request for Direction

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

The decision

2019-11-26 · Toronto City Council · adopted

As filed

City Council on November 26 and 27, 2019, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 19, 2019) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 19, 2019) from the City Solicitor when settlement is finalized to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

Show the rest of As filed, 688 more characters as filed

3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 19, 2019) from the City Solicitor remain confidential as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 19, 2019) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 19, 2019) from the City Solicitor will be made public when settlement is finalized to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

On the agenda

As the city filed it

The City of Toronto passed the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan (CWSP) in April 2003, and subsequently a zoning by-law for East Bayfront (By-law No. 1049-2006). Owners of a number of the private development sites in the precinct filed appeals to the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan and the zoning by-law. At its meeting on March 20, 2014, City Council adopted confidential instructions to staff in the report (February 5, 2014) from the City Solicitor and the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,340 more characters as filed

A copy of the Request for Directions Report can be found at the following link: https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69146.pdf This report seeks further direction and provides advice regarding the lands located at 162 Queens Quay East, as approved by Council on May 6, 2014 (MM51.46), and as set out in subsequent Minutes of Settlement dated May 12, 2014. Since the 2014 Minutes of Settlement were executed by the parties, issues relating to the appeals by the owners of the adjacent FedEx lands (215 Lake Shore Boulevard East and 178-180 Queens Quay) have been resolved, and Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT") Orders for the FedEx lands were issued on October 23, 2018. A site plan approval application (2019 128893 STE 10 SA) is currently under review for the development at 162 Queens Quay East. Through the detailed review of the development proposal, staff have identified improvements to its built form that would better align and be consistent with the adjacent FedEx lands development with respect to the street wall height and the taking of lands for a new east-west public road through the development block. This report seeks further direction on proposed revisions to the terms of the Minutes of Settlement related to 162 Queens Quay East, as outlined in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

Staff recommended

The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 of this report. 2. If adopted by Council, City Council authorize the public release of the Recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 when settlement is finalized to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. 3. City Council direct that the remainder of the confidential information contained in

Show the rest of Staff recommended, 132 more characters as filed

Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential in its entirety, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

    On the record

    The item as the City filed it

    More from this meeting

    The whole meeting