The filed record
106 Cortleigh Boulevard - Request Representation at the Toronto Local Appeal Body File A0330/20NY - by Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Jaye Robinson
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2020-12-16 · Toronto City Council · adopted
As filed
City Council on December 16, 17 and 18, 2020, adopted the following: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body to support and uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decision for the Minor Variances Application A0330/20NY and any other variances that may be requested regarding 106 Cortleigh Boulevard. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary and at the City Solicitor's discretion.
Show the rest of As filed, 322 more characters as filed
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a resolution of the appeal of the decision and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City at the City Solicitor's discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director, Community Planning, North District.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
On October 7, 2020, the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel Refused the application which proposed to add a livable third floor within the existing attic. In their report to the Committee, which is attached to this Motion, Community Planning staff recommended Refusal of the application. The Official Plan clarifies that the prevailing building type and physical character of a geographic neighbourhood will be determined by the most frequently occurring form of development in that neighbourhood.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,873 more characters as filed
The application proposed a variance to permit a third storey, whereas under Zoning Bylaw 569-2013, the maximum permitted storeys is two. The application also requests variances to permit a building height of 10.75 metres as measured under By-law 569-2013, whereas the maximum permitted building height is 7.2 metres. The maximum storey and building height provisions are devised, in part, to ensure a consistent pattern of development. It should be noted that the height of 10.75 metres was granted for a pitched roof by Committee of Adjustment Decision A0457/16NY in June 2016. A flat roof dwelling would create greater overlook issues, result in more shadowing and would generally feel more imposing than a pitched roof building. The application requests a Floor Space Index of 0.77 times the area of the lot whereas By-law Number 569-2013 permits a maximum Floor Space Index of 0.6 times the area of the lot. Floor Space Index provisions are devised, in part, to regulate the size of structures to ensure consistent patterns of development. The Floor Space Index of 0.625 was granted by Committee of Adjustment Decision A0457/16NY however, the staff report dated June 16, 2016 recommended the reduction of the Floor Space Index . The majority of new dwellings nearby to the subject property have been approved at approximately 0.6. Staff are of the opinion that the proposed Floor Space Index is contrary to the intent of the Zoning By-law and should be refused. I fully support staff's recommendation that the application for the proposed third storey, building height and the floor space index variances are contrary to the intent of the Zoning By-law and potentially destabilizing to the character of the neighbourhood. The applicant has appealed the Committee of Adjustment Refusal Decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Board. A date for the Hearing has not been set.
Staff recommended
Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Jaye Robinson, recommends that: 1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body to support and uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decision for the Minor Variances Application A0330/20NY and any other variances that may be requested regarding 106 Cortleigh Boulevard. 2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary and at the City Solicitor's discretion.
Show the rest of Staff recommended, 322 more characters as filed
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a resolution of the appeal of the decision and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City at the City Solicitor's discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director, Community Planning, North District.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming BillsFiled record
- Report on the Decision to Terminate the Investigation of a Complaint Against Former Councillor Justin Di CianoFiled record
- Keeping Santa On Track - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Mayor John ToryFiled record
- Call to OrderFiled record
- Appointment of Public Members to the Committee of AdjustmentFiled record
- Stopping Residential Evictions During COVID-19 - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Ana BailãoFiled record