Strengthening Security Policies for Vacant Buildings

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

The decision

2020-02-12 · Planning and Housing Committee · amended

As filed

The Planning and Housing Committee: 1. Requested the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to consult with the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, to compile data and identify options to improve safety and security for vacant buildings, as well as mechanisms

Show the rest of As filed, 226 more characters as filed

to require habitable buildings to be kept in use, prior to redevelopment, and report back, with recommendations, to the Planning and Housing Committee in the fourth quarter of 2020, as part of the review of property standards.

On the agenda

As the city filed it

Over the past two years, Ward 13 has seen three incidents of fire causing serious damage to heritage buildings. Two of these incidents, at 85 Shuter Street and 189 Mutual Street, respectively, resulted in critical injuries to firefighters, due to the age and instability of the buildings involved. The third incident nearly devastated Sheard Mansion, at 314 Jarvis Street, the former home of Toronto's Chief Medical Officer from 1893-1910, and a significant historical site.

Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,442 more characters as filed

All three vacant buildings were part of consolidated development sites. They were allowed to remain empty for years, growing ever more neglected over time. The protections required by the City were minimal; boards on the windows to prevent trespass. Enhanced security measures, such as bricked-up or barred windows and high fences, were not imposed until after the incidents had occurred. Toronto has many vacant buildings - of heritage interest or otherwise - that pose a continual risk to neighbouring communities and first responders, while a property owner is waiting for a buyer; or a planning application is in dispute. Even with development permissions in place, currently, an owner can let a vacant property languish for months, or years, without any consequence. This is an unacceptable waste of existing residential space, in the middle of a tragic housing crisis. Buildings that are kept in use are much safer, than those that have been abandoned to decay, accomplishing demolition by neglect. Empty buildings are a known temptation for trespass and arson. It is imperative that the City ensure that such buildings are either secured to the highest degree, or made habitable in the interim prior to re-development or a pending sale. Such actions will improve safety for residents and first responders, aid in the preservation of vulnerable heritage properties, and protect viable housing, in buildings that may otherwise sit empty.

Staff recommended

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam recommends that: 1. The Planning and Housing Committee direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to consult with the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, the Chief Building Official, and Executive Director, Toronto Building, and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to compile data and

Show the rest of Staff recommended, 268 more characters as filed

identify options to improve safety and security for vacant buildings, as well as mechanisms to require habitable buildings to be kept in use, prior to redevelopment, and report back, with recommendations, to the Planning and Housing Committee in third quarter of 2020.

On the record

The item as the City filed it

More from this meeting

The whole meeting