The filed record
Recommended Framework for the Use of Minister's Zoning Orders and Response to Bills 245 and 257
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2021-05-05 · Toronto City Council · adopted
As filed
City Council on May 5 and 6, 2021, adopted the following: 1. City Council advise the Province of Ontario that the City of Toronto supports the Province's scoped use of Minister's Zoning Orders provided that its use: a. includes collaboration with City staff and officials in advance of the issuing of these Orders, including public consultation, where feasible; b. is consistent with and/or in conformity with Provincial policies and legislation, including the Provincial Policy Statement and The Growth Plan and that it complies with the Ontario Heritage Act, as the case may be; c.
Show the rest of As filed, 1,119 more characters as filed
continues to ensure that Site Plan matters remain within the City's jurisdiction; d. balances local planning policy, including the Official Plan and technical considerations, in order to support complete communities and good planning; e. ensures that there is a mechanism for guaranteeing the City's revenue neutrality and the collection of appropriate community benefits in the event that Section 37 or Community Benefit Charges become inapplicable due to a Minister's Zoning Order; and f. incorporates a provision for adequate affordable housing in the proposed development, where appropriate. 2. City Council advise the Province of Ontario that it does not support the proposed changes to the Planning Act, contained in Bill 257, Supporting Broadband and Infrastructure Expansion Act, 2021 which provide that Ministerial Zoning Orders made under Section 47 are not required and are deemed to never have been required to be consistent with policy statements issued under Subsection 3 (1) of the Planning Act. 3. City Council direct the City Clerk to forward this Item to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing.
The vote
Adopt Item · Carried, 18-5
The whole record, all 26 members
- Ana BailãoFor
- Anthony PerruzzaAgainst
- Brad BradfordFor
- Cynthia LaiFor
- Denzil Minnan-WongFor
- Frances NunziataFor
- Gary CrawfordFor
- Gord PerksFor
- James PasternakFor
- Jaye RobinsonFor
- Jennifer McKelvieFor
- Joe CressyFor
- John FilionAgainst
- John ToryAbsent
- Josh MatlowAgainst
- Kristyn Wong-TamFor
- Mark GrimesAbsent
- Michael FordFor
- Michael ThompsonFor
- Mike ColleAgainst
- Mike LaytonFor
- Nick MantasFor
- Paul AinslieFor
- Paula FletcherAbsent
- Shelley CarrollFor
- Stephen HolydayAgainst
Every name opens that member’s record.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
This report recommends measures that the Provincial government should implement when utilizing Ministers Zoning Orders ("MZOs") powers to protect local public interest and ensure accountability. MZOs can be an effective tool when used judiciously, in consultation with the affected municipality and local communities. To that end, it is recommended that the Minister should consult with, engage and reach agreement with the affected municipality in advance of making a decision to issue a MZO.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 2,064 more characters as filed
This would essentially mimic a development review or due diligence process that provides due diligence against policy and standards that would otherwise apply to any other public or private development proposal. The goal would be to ensure that any proposed development can be implemented at the local level giving consideration to potential land-use planning issues related to site plans and ensure that the development is compatible with the surrounding area and contributes to the economic, social, cultural and environmental vitality of the City. In addition, the Province should consider some form of formal public engagement where appropriate in the use of the MZOs. Public engagement not only results in more informed residents, but also can generate more support for the final decisions reached by decision makers. Participation helps generate ownership. Involved residents who have helped to shape a proposed development will better understand the issue itself and the reasons for the decisions that are made. Good communications about the public's involvement in a local decision can increase the support of the broader community as well. This report also responds to two recently announced proposed legislative changes. The first and which staff have concerns with are the proposed enhancements to the Minister's Zoning Order Powers (section 47 of the Planning Act) introduced on March 4, 2021 through Bill 257, Supporting Broadband and Infrastructure Expansion Act, 2021. The Bill proposes to amend the Planning Act to provide that ministerial zoning orders made under section 47 are not required and are deemed to never have been required to be consistent with policy statements issued under subsection 3 (1) of the PPS. Secondly, this Report addresses the legislative changes introduced on February 16, 2021, in Bill 245, the Accelerating Access to Justice Act, 2021. Bill 245 is an omnibus Bill affecting multiple pieces of legislation and the merging of existing land tribunals into one administrative body to be known as the Ontario Land Tribunal.
Staff recommended
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning recommends that: 1. City Council advise the Province that the City of Toronto supports the Province's scoped use of Minister's Zoning Orders provided that its use: a. includes collaboration with City staff and officials in advance of the issuing of these Orders, including public consultation where feasible; b. is consistent with and/or in conformity with Provincial policies and legislation, including the Provincial Policy Statement and The Growth Plan and that it complies with the Ontario Heritage Act, as the case may be; c.
Show the rest of Staff recommended, 1,102 more characters as filed
continues to ensure that Site Plan matters remain within the City's jurisdiction; d. balances local planning policy, including the Official Plan and technical considerations in order to support complete communities and good planning; e. ensures that there is a mechanism for guaranteeing the City's revenue neutrality and the collection of appropriate community benefits in the event that Section 37 or Community Benefit Charges become inapplicable due to a Minister's Zoning Order; f. incorporates a provision for adequate affordable housing in the proposed development where appropriate. 2. City Council advise the Province that it does not support the proposed changes to the Planning Act, contained in Bill 257, Supporting Broadband and Infrastructure Expansion Act, 2021 which provide that ministerial zoning orders made under section 47 are not required and are deemed to never have been required to be consistent with policy statements issued under subsection 3 (1) of the Planning Act. 3. City Council direct the City Clerk to forward this Item to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing.
Considered
2021-04-22 · Planning and Housing Committee · adopted
Decision as filed
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that: 1. City Council advise the Province that the City of Toronto supports the Province's scoped use of Minister's Zoning Orders provided that its use: a. includes collaboration with City staff and officials in advance of the issuing of these Orders, including public consultation where feasible; b. is consistent with and/or in conformity with Provincial policies and legislation, including the Provincial Policy Statement and The Growth Plan and that it complies with the Ontario Heritage Act, as the case may be; c.
Show the rest of Decision as filed, 1,102 more characters as filed
continues to ensure that Site Plan matters remain within the City's jurisdiction; d. balances local planning policy, including the Official Plan and technical considerations in order to support complete communities and good planning; e. ensures that there is a mechanism for guaranteeing the City's revenue neutrality and the collection of appropriate community benefits in the event that Section 37 or Community Benefit Charges become inapplicable due to a Minister's Zoning Order; f. incorporates a provision for adequate affordable housing in the proposed development where appropriate. 2. City Council advise the Province that it does not support the proposed changes to the Planning Act, contained in Bill 257, Supporting Broadband and Infrastructure Expansion Act, 2021 which provide that ministerial zoning orders made under section 47 are not required and are deemed to never have been required to be consistent with policy statements issued under subsection 3 (1) of the Planning Act. 3. City Council direct the City Clerk to forward this Item to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing.
2021-05-05 · Toronto City Council · adopted
On the record
More from this meeting
- Christie's Planning Study - City-Initiated Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law and Urban Design and Streetscape Guidelines - Final ReportFiled record
- Technical Amendments to Zoning By-law 569-2013 and Scarborough West Hill Community By-law 10327Filed record
- 641-663 Danforth Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary ReportFiled record
- 72 Steeles Avenue West and 7040-7054 Yonge Street in the City of Vaughan - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications and Draft Plan of Subdivision - Request for Direction ReportFiled record
- 2021 Toronto Heritage Grant AwardsFiled record
- Draft Delineations for the Protected Major Transit Station Areas within the Downtown Secondary Plan and Draft Citywide Major Transit Station Areas (MTSA) Policy DirectionsFiled record