The filed record
Review of Mediation and Settlement on Planning Process
The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.
The decision
2021-11-25 · Planning and Housing Committee · adopted
As filed
The Planning and Housing Committee: 1. Directed the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Chief Planner and the City Clerk to report in the first quarter of 2022 on the negotiation process for development applications which have been appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal. The report should: describe the negotiation process; review any conflict between the negotiation process and public consultation, and Council's authority
Show the rest of As filed, 287 more characters as filed
to manage the development review process; offer advice on best practices; and recommend any policy, regulation or legislative changes which would improve the process in terms of Council's desire to consult with the public and Council's authority to manage the development review process.
On the agenda
As the city filed it
In recent years the process of negotiations between the City and developers on applications which have been appealed to the Ontario Land Use Tribunal has been questioned with respect to the degree of public transparency. Further, Council is often put in a position of having to consider a settlement offer with: very little time for review; limited ability to discuss it publicly; and, advice which can appear to the public as different from the advice provided in previous public reports.
Show the rest of As the city filed it, 582 more characters as filed
Ensuring that the planning process is both transparent and seen to be transparent is essential. Ensuring Council has proper oversight of the planning process is essential. At the same time the City Solicitor and Chief Planner have professional obligations and a duty to protect the interests of the City. The negotiation process on applications which are under appeal as it is currently constructed can put these three roles in conflict. It is therefore appropriate and timely for staff to give advice to Council on the negotiation process for applications which have been appealed.
Staff recommended
Councillor Perks recommends that the Planning and Housing Committee: 1. Direct the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Chief Planner and the City Clerk to report in the first quarter of 2022 on the negotiation process for development applications which have been appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal. The report should: describe the negotiation process; review any conflict between the negotiation process and public
Show the rest of Staff recommended, 325 more characters as filed
consultation, and Council's authority to manage the development review process; offer advice on best practices; and recommend any policy, regulation or legislative changes which would improve the process in terms of Council's desire to consult with the public and Council's authority to manage the development review process.
On the record
More from this meeting
- Technical Amendments to Zoning By-law 569-2013Filed record
- Changing Lanes: The City of Toronto's Review of Laneway Suites - Monitoring Program and Zoning By-law Amendments- Final ReportFiled record
- Recommended Parking Requirements for New DevelopmentFiled record
- Etobicoke Civic Centre - City-Initiated Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final ReportFiled record
- Implementing Tenants First: Authority to Enter Into a Municipal Capital Facilities Agreement for the Single-Family Homes being Transferred to the Non-Profit Housing SectorFiled record
- HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan - 2021 Annual Progress UpdateFiled record