The Public GalleryToronto

Infrastructure and Environment Committee · 2023-01-30 · 2023.IE1.9

The filed record

Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Effluent Disinfection System - Construction Delay Claims

The Public Gallery wrote no story on this item. What follows is the city’s own record of what happened to it, as filed: nothing on this page is summarised or scored by us.

The decision

2023-02-07 · Toronto City Council · adopted

As filed

City Council on February 7 and 8, 2023, adopted the following: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (January 16, 2023) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council direct that the confidential instructions in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (January 16, 2023) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor and that the balance of confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential in its entirety, as it pertains to potential litigation and contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Show the rest of As filed, 476 more characters as filed

Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (January 16, 2023) from the City Solicitor remains confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it pertains to potential litigation and contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (January 16, 2023) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

On the agenda

As the city filed it

The City awarded Contract No. 17ECS-MI-03AB to Graham Construction and Engineering LP ("Graham") on January 19, 2018 to upgrade the effluent disinfection system at the Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant ("ABTP") and to refurbish the water pumping station and seawall substation. The total value of the contract is $209,363,500 excluding HST. During excavation work, Graham discovered existing buried sheet piles which interfered with the proposed construction.

Show the rest of As the city filed it, 1,314 more characters as filed

The City was not aware of the sheet piles prior to excavation and issued a change directive to Graham dated August 20, 2018 for their removal. The City issued a second change directive to Graham dated August 21, 2018 to remove a portion of the seawall which extended approximately 90 metres further west than shown in the contract drawings and was directly interfering with the location of influent channels and service tunnels that would support the disinfection building. Due to the delays related to the work associated with the change directives, the City issued change order 097 ("CO97") dated November 25, 2020 to grant Graham an extension of time. Graham subsequently submitted a claim for costs arising from the modified scope of work and a dispute has arisen between the City and Graham with respect to the resulting time and cost impacts. Graham's Additional Delay Claims: In addition to the extension of time the City granted to Graham in CO97, Graham seeks additional extensions of time due to alleged delay events from January 31, 2019 to November 2020. The City disputes Graham's assessment of the causes and calculation of these delays. Confidential Attachment 1 contains legal advice from the City Solicitor with respect to the assessment of these claims and recommendations for dispute resolution.

Staff recommended

The City Solicitor recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1. 2. City Council direct that the confidential instructions in Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor and that the balance of confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential in its entirety, as it pertains to potential litigation and contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Considered

  • 2023-01-30 · Infrastructure and Environment Committee · adopted

    Decision as filed

    The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that: 1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (January 16, 2023) from the City Solicitor. 2. City Council direct that the confidential instructions in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (January 16, 2023) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor and that

    Show the rest of Decision as filed, 183 more characters as filed

    the balance of confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential in its entirety, as it pertains to potential litigation and contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

  • 2023-02-07 · Toronto City Council · adopted

On the record

The item as the City filed it

More from this meeting

The whole meeting